I would take your first option any day
(Wife would probably say no)
It may be slightly less Dangerous than living with my ex-wife.
It may be a very worthy pursuit; showing the true nature of conflict to the uneffected masses.
It may be a perversely 'attractive' thing to do.
But it is not glamorous.
War is not romantic.
It is not something that we ought to see in those dreamy kind of terms.
Did you see his pictures?
People running from mortars open armed towards the tanks, old men, women children, carrying what few possessions they could carry.... and then having a rifle shoved in their face, and made to kneel down in front of a sub-machine gun pit....
He went, he did his bit, bringing it home to the people.... he, has recounted some of the more humorous incidents, conter-pointing, and playing down, where he was in mortal danger and in the middle of people being blown to chunks of gore..... but I think, if you think its in some-way 'glamorous' you got the wrong message. Its anything but.
That's glamour.....
This just isn't.
In any way-shape-or-form.
I can applaud him having been. And I can appreciate his pictures. But I really don't think that what he wanted to envoke in the viewer was any sense of glamour, and that going to war was something we OUGHT to find appealing!