He said that ??

or should that be

? In which case he's gone down in my estimation. That was 1940...81 years ago ! If you mentioned the Blitz to the young members of the team they'd probably ask what it was.
I see he also said
" “People tried to invade us, and we had the courage to hold it back and you can't hide that energy in the stadium against Germany .It was because of that. I never mentioned that to the players, but I know that's part of what the story was." How does he know that that ? I'd have thought Germany knocking us out of the Euro final in 1996 was more of a reason. No, he wouldn't mention it to the players because none of them were born when WW2 took place and at least the youngest wouldn't know what the Blitz was anyway.The average age of the England squad is 25. For Italy it's 27.
How utterly pathetic..Anyway, by appealing to
that wartime spirit..which he did..he is, regarding tomorrow's final, in effect, saying the England team are going into this final with their backs to the wall. Playing the victim, in essence but obviously unaware that of 200 countries there are only 22 that we haven't invaded ourselves.
How about saying that we have the youngest squad in the tournament with ages ranging from Jude Bellingham, 18 years old to the old man,Kyle Walker at 31.

. An excellent combination of youth and experience all with a very high level of competence and skill and a strong desire to be successful this time round. We don't need the ghost of WW2 hanging over the stadium.
On the news at 6.30pm I saw a clip of an interview with Geoff Hurst who related some of his top career games. The only player to score a hatrick in a World Cup Final in that 4-2 win over Germany back in 1966.. Listening to it was Mason Mount and when asked what was motivating him Mason said ,having listened to Geoff Hurst that will motivate him. ie. Hurst's success. So..not the atmosphere inside Wembly motivated by the Blitz.our resistance to the Blitz.
By all accounts Southgate himself has motivated them well, moulded a cohesive team..club divisions (as was the case of old) gone, ensuring that those not in the starting line-up or subs feel part of it and non-selection for a game is not a reflection of his opinion of their competence and skill..it's tactical. At club level I expect Grealish would have thrown his teddy on the floor if he'd come on as a sub and then subbed as happened against Denmark but Southgate ensured that he knew what it was ..a tactical move to retain the 2-1 goal advantage after Kane scored the penalty . Grealish is anything but a defender...an attacking mid-fielder,I suppose. It worked and Grealish,by all accounts, understood that and accepted it with good grace. So, why did Southgate feel he had to invoke WW2 is beyond me. Sometimes ,when being interviewed people say things that, with hindsight, they wished they hadn't. Hopefully, that's the case with him.