As I always say, if your gonna have one have a big one![]()
That is exactly what I thought when I saw that man at whipsnade whip it out by lynxes. I said to myself wow that is a big one.
Hmm I might actually have a photo of it, maybe I should post it here![]()
*takes a bow*That is exactly what I thought when I saw that man at whipsnade whip it out by lynxes. I said to myself wow that is a big one.
Nothing I can say or do will prevent that I guess?Hmm I might actually have a photo of it, maybe I should post it here![]()
Oi do you mind. I like the '500', especially as a 595. I might still get one and the 595 is an absolute blast to drive.
But Tata and Dacia don't have sporty models so you have completely missed the point. Just because the Fiesta ST costs less than the Fiat, it doesn't follow it is cheap or tinny. You'd get a lot more enjoyment out of the Fiesta ST than the Fiat Handbag. Even the mucho cheapo MG3 is a better handling car than the Fiat. I'm intrigued to know how you can enjoy a car knowing you could have bought better for less. The only thing stopping the Fiat being boy racerish is it's a girls car.Perhaps so, you can have several Tata or Dacia cars for even less. Doesn't make them anymore desirable. Being cheap is to me not a criteria to buy a vehicle, I must like it, I must enjoy it. To me a fiesta is like a corsa, too boy racerish, too tinny, just not a consideration at all. Then again I've never been a Ford fan, cant think of a single model in their range which I would consider.
The only thing stopping the Fiat being boy racerish is it's a girls car.![]()
Faster, better handling, more fun and rewarding to drive and doesn't have to be driven like a boy racer neither. I'd have had a Fiesta ST (I'm 52) but I need a bigger car so bought a Focus ST and that was cost less than the Fiat too. You obviously frequent the wrong areas if you only encounter boyracers in Ford ST's. They more likely to be found in VW's. Audi's or anything German for that matter and I'm in Essex. Taking advice from teenagers isn't cool neither.It all depends on your definition of better. To me the ford is hardly ever the better option. It just doesn't do anything for me. As such less != more for me.
Besides I get the ST brigade nearly every day trying to have a street "race". It is so funny as there isn't even a point in trying, I just let them 'win'.
Perhaps if I was late teens or early twenties I'd consider one, but listening to my teenagers even then it is not cool.
I guess I'm in touch with my feminine side. Don't agree on the height thing at all. My daughter is 12 and already 1.72m and easily fitted in the back. She complains in my golf and the mini works we test drove. But yes most definitely prefers the size of the GL to be a passenger.that is certainly the impression I get. They are intentionally designed to appeal specifically to those buyers. In fact they are so incredibly small I don't see how anyone taller than 1.65m (or maybe less) could fit in one. Fiesta on the other hand can sort of accommodate life size humans, however I'm with Steve here - E class or similar dimensions equivalent is a minimum sensible car.
You don't encounter them because you are driving one. It would be different if you were in an Golf RFaster, better handling, more fun and rewarding to drive and doesn't have to be driven like a boy racer neither. I'd have had a Fiesta ST (I'm 52) but I need a bigger car so bought a Focus ST and that was cost less than the Fiat too. You obviously frequent the wrong areas if you only encounter boyracers in Ford ST's. They more likely to be found in VW's. Audi's or anything German for that matter and I'm in Essex. Taking advice from teenagers isn't cool neither.
Wouldn't be seen dead in one,It would be different if you were in an Golf R![]()
They more likely to be found in VW's. Audi's or anything German for that matter and I'm in Essex. Taking advice from teenagers isn't cool neither.
For me, if it had to be small and front wheel drive I'd prefer a Renault sport megane or seat Ibiza. That is if I was going for all out drivers enjoyment and agility.
Scary thought is that the time will be there soon to get something fun and manual shifting for my girls.
And I've only got 8 more months in my R. Got to think what I will get next for myself.
Focus RS due at end of the year, 320PS plus, but expect it to be more in the region of 350PSAnd I've only got 8 more months in my R. Got to think what I will get next for myself.
But but but, to use your words, its much better, quicker, faster, better handling, better screwed together, and cheaper. It eats any ford currently on sale for breakfastWouldn't be seen dead in one,
Lol no electronic gadgets for ours. We are quite strict about that especially as a) the eldest broke our trust, and b) on a professional level I have a unique insight gathered now over many years as to how big the problem is. But that is a whole different conversation I can not have in public.Corsa yobs here in Scotland. Subaru was several years back, now you don't see many at all. Cars must vary from place to place.
FWD hot hatches... hmmm I'd go for Focus ST here myself if I was forced at a gunpoint to get one. Standard sized Golfs are very tight inside. Octavia VRS / Golf plus / Tiguan - more like it (more space). Honestly, there are much nicer Passats, Audi A6, 4-6 series BMW and they go even better. Maybe even B-class merc if buying new. They can be quite thuggish with 2.1 L diesel owing to nice seating positions with great visibility, low weight and low end diesel grunt. You just don't want to face the repair bills of these things.
As far as your daughters go I suspect they may too prefer to spend more time with handheld electronic gadgets. New generation seem to go this way; very few young people are truly enthusiastic about cars they way it used to be. They may be more than happy with your average auto eco box as long as it 'just goes' from A to B.
I recon they should get more power out of it. It will really be trailing behind the competition and it is rather late.Focus RS due at end of the year, 320PS plus, but expect it to be more in the region of 350PS
A mate at work has already driven a detuned (300PS) test vehicle on Ford's Lommel proving grounds and reckons it's mental. Took a lot of goes to get the back end to step out even just a little bit.
They are not though, they are more expensive and not better screwed together as you put it. I get to see them dismantled completely into component form at work and believe me they are nothing special. Oh and the currently on sale Ford Mustang GT will eat your Golf R for breakfast, and when the uprated version comes out it will likely eat it for lunch dinner and supper too.But but but, to use your words, its much better, quicker, faster, better handling, better screwed together, and cheaper. It eats any ford currently on sale for breakfast![]()
The new RS is 4wd, but with an intelligent 4wd system that instead of backing off power to a wheel that has lost grip will increase power up to 100%, to the opposite wheel instead to allow the car to continue to power through a bend safely rather than it applying the brakes and making it slower. It will also come with drift mode and track mode should you want to take it on a race track.I recon they should get more power out of it. It will really be trailing behind the competition and it is rather late.
Will it still be fwd? I have a few acquaintances with the old one and they just cant get the power down and forget it with a bit of rain.
Personally I would find the new Type R more interesting. A friend got the new Audi RS3 on order, again doesn't do it for me either. I hate the interior, truly dislike it.
I like the Mustang GT, the word is that finally for the first time they could go around a corner as well. Hmm we'll have to see about that. But ahem, it is not actually on sale just yet...it is not released yet in the UK as far as I am aware...They are not though, they are more expensive and not better screwed together as you put it. I get to see them dismantled completely into component form at work and believe me they are nothing special. Oh and the currently on sale Ford Mustang GT will eat your Golf R for breakfast, and when the uprated version comes out it will likely eat it for lunch dinner and supper too.![]()
The new RS is 4wd, but with an intelligent 4wd system that instead of backing off power to a wheel that has lost grip will increase power up to 100%, to the opposite wheel instead to allow the car to continue to power through a bend safely rather than it applying the brakes and making it slower. It will also come with drift mode and track mode should you want to take it on a race track.
I think it will all be about breaking the control of the computer and providing a manual override. In addition there will always be tinkering 'Kevin' who think they know better and will provide 'improvements' to the handling, suspension, distance of the car in-front etc...Just to try to get this thread vaguely back on track: I wonder what will happen to the hot car / boy racer culture when driverless cars become the norm? I wouldn't mind betting that a computer controlled car could hustle it along country lanes faster than most human drivers could; will that matter? Will there be a market for performance tuning in software rather than hardware? Will people still argue the toss over the Focus ST vs the Golf R or whatever?
I disagree with wuyanxu, a computer is much better and quicker at calculating the impacts and possible outcomes of variables at junctions and roundabouts...And unless someone tinkers with the computer programmes or the fail saves they will actually stick to the rules.....
Cities with the most dire congestion will be the first to introduce "driverless only" separated routes. Which, at twice the speed and half the gap, and no junction controls, will suck a whole load of traffic out of the congested roads. And encourage use of more driverless vehicles. And lower city air pollution.
I'll wave with both hands out the side window at the boy racers, sitting in stop-start traffic, as I whistle past.
Just to try to get this thread vaguely back on track: I wonder what will happen to the hot car / boy racer culture when driverless cars become the norm? I wouldn't mind betting that a computer controlled car could hustle it along country lanes faster than most human drivers could; will that matter? Will there be a market for performance tuning in software rather than hardware? Will people still argue the toss over the Focus ST vs the Golf R or whatever?
Although machines are excellent drivers, they are awful at seeing and recognising things like humans can. But perhaps they are getting good enough to drive.It's incredible arrogance of some to assume that humans are somehow better at driving that machines will be.
Personal a to b transport is different from current public transport. However if tube trains break (decouple) into pods and branch off, and join up to make new trains, we might be getting somewhere.Isn't that what the tube/metro/subway is? Lob in trams for the above ground option.
Reminds me of the Rush song Red Barchetta. In a dystopic future, he sneaks outside the wire to a hidden vintage sportscar to go for his regular illegal spin out in the bad-lands. But gets chased by the guards in huge modern air cars. But the superior handling and small size of his roadster lets him get away. Or something.This sort of means performance cars would only survive if / until human driving is not outlawed.
Ooh, nice one. Haven't listened to that for ages. Thanks.Reminds me of the Rush song Red Barchetta. In a dystopic future, he sneaks outside the wire to a hidden vintage sportscar to go for his regular illegal spin out in the bad-lands. But gets chased by the guards in huge modern air cars. But the superior handling and small size of his roadster lets him get away. Or something.
None of that makes sense. If driverless cars will be on separated routes and remove a lot of traffic from the congested roads, the congested roads will no longer be congested and you won't be waving at them with both hands as you'll be on a separate road.Cities with the most dire congestion will be the first to introduce "driverless only" separated routes. Which, at twice the speed and half the gap, and no junction controls, will suck a whole load of traffic out of the congested roads. And encourage use of more driverless vehicles. And lower city air pollution.
I'll wave with both hands out the side window at the boy racers, sitting in stop-start traffic, as I whistle past.
It's obviously an alien concept to you but some of us actually enjoy driving. Since passing my test over 34yrs ago I can honestly say I've been a passenger in a car no more than 10 times.It will take a while for some people to see the light.
That is besides the point. Many of is enjoy driving, but that is irrelevant.It's obviously an alien concept to you but some of us actually enjoy driving. Since passing my test over 34yrs ago I can honestly say I've been a passenger in a car no more than 10 times.
No argument from meIt's obviously an alien concept to you but some of us actually enjoy driving. .