MindofMel
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,586
- Name
- Mel
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi all,
Just scanning in what was supposed to be an epic neg of shots - to utter dismay - on 3-4 frames 3 times within the roll (roll shot over 3 days) and then there is a double exposure.. wtf? How is that even possible. [/rant]
I get how its technically possible, but I advanced the film after every shot - also the camera doesn't fire unless you advance the film along? Does this mean the sprockets werent moving the film along? If so should I send it in for repair or something...?
fuming.
the ONE set of shots of this homeless guy reaching out and accepting money from this little kid JUST as a guy is falling over in the background and spilling change - all have *swearword* double exposures of trafalgar square over them. I mean COME ON - the chances. Maybe in my excitement I moved the lever to fast thus making the film jump? but then... what the hell did sports togs do?
Just scanning in what was supposed to be an epic neg of shots - to utter dismay - on 3-4 frames 3 times within the roll (roll shot over 3 days) and then there is a double exposure.. wtf? How is that even possible. [/rant]
I get how its technically possible, but I advanced the film after every shot - also the camera doesn't fire unless you advance the film along? Does this mean the sprockets werent moving the film along? If so should I send it in for repair or something...?
fuming.
the ONE set of shots of this homeless guy reaching out and accepting money from this little kid JUST as a guy is falling over in the background and spilling change - all have *swearword* double exposures of trafalgar square over them. I mean COME ON - the chances. Maybe in my excitement I moved the lever to fast thus making the film jump? but then... what the hell did sports togs do?
Last edited: