- Messages
- 7,018
- Name
- Keith
- Edit My Images
- Yes

Oh dear

Then I'm sorry to say it, but your uncle is/was an idiot.
Pete, you misunderstand my sentiment
I believe that shooting the dog was perfectly justified by the livestock owner.
I was just answering Neil's apparent wondering on how the dog could be missing for a week when it went missing.
Other articles I've read give more detaila on that, plus unless I've missed it, the owner doesn't seem to be saying the shooting was malicious.
I don't
"Farmers are allowed to shoot a dog under Section 9 of the Animals Act if they believe it is the only reasonable way of stopping it worrying livestock"
the farmer couldn't have stopped a one year old Cocker Spaniel by any other means first?
I don't
"Farmers are allowed to shoot a dog under Section 9 of the Animals Act if they believe it is the only reasonable way of stopping it worrying livestock"
the farmer couldn't have stopped a one year old Cocker Spaniel by any other means first?
Would have been better just to get the cost of replacement hens from the owner. They're only hens. Killing two dogs for the sake of a few birds seems excessive. If they're that easy to get at what does the farmer do about foxes?
They were only spaniels not enormous killing machines. Farmer sounds inept.
Tragic story but does this mean that if a farmer loses control of his sheep/cow and it strays onto the road potentially causing an accident, can you kill it?
I'll have you know I don't choose to wear tweedWell I can't think of a single sighting of a farmer with a gun in a tractor cab (sounds risky).
Let alone "carrying one around while working".
The estate gamekeepers have them though, and some would mistake them for farmers due to silly hats and tendency to wear tweedy archaic garments.
You may be thinking of a different sort of farmer to me (and I am one)