Depth of Field, what difference does it make ?

Jelster

Suspended / Banned
Messages
9,986
Name
Steve
Edit My Images
Yes
There have been a few threads lately discussing DoF (Depth of Field) so I thought I'd put up a thread showing the effect that DoF can have on an image.

Depth of Field is dependant on a number of criteria but mainly the lens aperture ("F Stop") and the distance of the subject. Other elements can also come into play for a given image, such as the focal length of the lens and the distance of the subject and it's background.

Also, a contentious issue is sensor size, but I don't want to enter into that here as there have been a couple of threads in this section recently, so you can read them and make up your own mind :thinking:

So, as this is "Talk Basics" I am going to assume that we are working with a single sensor size (in this case the Canon APS-C of my 7D, which is often referred to as a "1.6 Crop").

So, Part 1, we are going to use a focal length of 85mm, a fixed subject to distance (in this case just over 2 Metres) and change the aperture of the lens to see what happens.

Let's start at a nice small aperture of f22.


85mm f22 by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

As you can see, although the front bullrush is the focal point, the other two are also in focus, and you get a very good idea of the background.

Now, we open up the aperture a couple of stops to f11.


85mm f11 by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

At First glance not a lot seems to have changed, but if you look closely, the foreground does seem to separate from the background more obviously.

Open up a couple of stops more to f5.6


85mm f5.6 by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

Now we are starting to see the background being thrown completely out of focus, the the rear bullrush is no longer in focus at all.

Finally, we'll open the lens right up to f1.8


85mm f1.8 by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

Now we have that wonderful blurred background, the other bulrushes are no longer in focus and the subject leaps out of the image. Your eyes are drawn to the subject because that's all that is in focus.

It's a good exercise for anyone who's fairly new to the hobby to do, and the ability to throw unwanted backgrounds out of focus is a really useful tool. It does however have it's pitfalls.

The closer you get to the subject the smaller the DoF becomes and it can sometimes be difficult to keep all of your subject in focus. Quite often portraits taken at f1.8-1.2 will only get one eye fully in focus, so be careful how you use it.

Likewise, it's not very likely that you'll want to shoot landscapes wide open, but you can to get a different effect, like this shot:


Clifton Suspension Bridge by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

Next we'll look at what happens when you change focal length.

Steve
 
Last edited:
Part Deux....

Here I have a range of shots taken on my 70-200 f2.8, all wide open, this time all I have changed is the focal length to see what happens.

So, we'll start at 70mm, the widest the lens will go:


f2.8 - 70mm by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

So, as you would expect, similar to the previous post using the 85mm at f1.8, the other bullrushes are out of focus and the subject is quite obvious.

Let's zoom in to 135mm


f2.8 - 135mm by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

By extending the focal length we get the effect of smoothing out the background blur (also known as Bokeh) and by bringing the subject further into the frame we isolate it from the background.

Finally, we zoom right in to 200mm


f2.8 - 200mm by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

Now the subject has all of our attention. By zooming in and having a wide aperture, the subject is totally isolated from it's background.

This is a key method used by wildlife photographers, particularly with birds, when trying to fill the frame with a small subject at distance (have a look at the Birding section). However it can be used for any type of photograph when your trying to isolate your subject as much as possible.

Obviously, the reverse of this is to provide a wide depth of field when you are looking to take images of landscapes, or perhaps wildlife in their environment.

Steve
 
that is an excellent example and idea for a novice to photography to understand
 
One more thing, selecting f2.8 doesn't get you out of trouble all of the time.

Look at the following image of my local marina on the Grand Union Canal:


DoF Tests by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

I was hoping that by selecting f2.8 I would throw the factories in the background out of focus. However, I obviously needed to be closer to the subject to make that happen, which would have needed a boat :lol:

In any case, I would of reduced the focal length by moving forward, so it may have not of had as muchas an effect as I wanted anyway. It's not a cure for all ills !

Steve
 
Thanks for this... don't think my camera f stops goes down to 1.5, I think the lowest is 4 something... I am struggling with how to select the focus point on my D5000. I played around with water shots last night I got some good first pics (well I thought so) :)
 
What is the reason behind selecting F2.8? is there aything special about this

Cheers
 
My experience of Depth of Field was completely different. I did some test shots at the same distance with the same f no (f3.5) and the same lens and the 3 shots all came out differently. The exif is intact and proves that what I am saying is correct.

I just don't understand it ;)

See here!
 
My experience of Depth of Field was completely different. I did some test shots at the same distance with the same f no (f3.5) and the same lens and the 3 shots all came out differently. The exif is intact and proves that what I am saying is correct.

I just don't understand it ;)

See here!

But you had to bend the lens to do that :D

Bearing in mind this is in Talk Basics, and this would only serve to confuse the beginners I should point out that Ed was using a Tilt Shift lens
 
What is the reason behind selecting F2.8? is there aything special about this

Cheers

I selected f2.8 on the image of the narrow boats because I wanted to decrease the depth of field, in an attempt to throw the factories in the background out of focus. My efforts were in vain because I needed to get closer to the subject for this to have a greater effect. f2.8 is the largest aperture on that particular lens, and my longest lens with a larger aperture wasn't long enough.

Remember, reducing distance between camera & subject will reduce the depth of field. Unfortunately to get closer to the boats I would have needed to get into the water, and I didn't need the photo that much :D

Edit: I've just read that again and it sounds confusing....
 
Last edited:
Thanks for this... don't think my camera f stops goes down to 1.5, I think the lowest is 4 something... I am struggling with how to select the focus point on my D5000. I played around with water shots last night I got some good first pics (well I thought so) :)

Sorry, can't help you with selecting the AF points on your camera, I'm a Canonite and know very little about the cameras from the "dark side" ;)

Steve
 
My experience of Depth of Field was completely different. I did some test shots at the same distance with the same f no (f3.5) and the same lens and the 3 shots all came out differently. The exif is intact and proves that what I am saying is correct.

I just don't understand it ;)

See here!

I appreciate your wit Ed, but I don't want to confuse people even more, I seem to be doing a great job of that all on my own :bonk:

Steve
 
Very helpful and easier to understand than some of my books thanks :thumbs:
 
Steve thank you for you post definitely helps a novice like me.

Sent from my HTC Hero using TP Forums
 
Back
Top