Including the roads. The more fuel you use, the more goes to the pot, and the more that goes to the roads...unless you can prove catagorically that no revenue at all from road fuel goes to the roads?
I don't think you are getting this or you might be trying to be obtuse. When the cyclist is cycling, they are not using the car they may or may not own. They are therefore not paying into this big pot you are referring to when using their bike, but if they were driving for that journey, they would be.
Swindon![]()
In fact I get reduced motor insurance by agreeing a cap on the number of miles I drive annually but no reduction on VED even if I am (well not quite yet) a pensioner who only drives 10 - 15 miles a week) As usual those with the least amount of income pay the most tax
On the subject of cycling events on the New Forest, unless they are officially races, no there is no need to inform anyone. No they are not publicised, if so where. Had no need to go onto the Wiggle/Gridiron route, only a few mils from home at Setley encountered the inevitable signs of yet another cycling event, only to say that participants were encountered in small groups so this event in itself did not cause any problems for me
going back to the OP suggestion has been made that all motor vehicles should be chipped. Next year this will be compulsory for dogs
Instead of plates why not bikes be chipped likewise
Err I pay plenty of vehicle based tax ta.I pay for the fuel used and that all goes into the pot as I said already. Car drivers pay a fortune in tax, through fuel duty, VED and are a cash cow. Cyclists, well, they don't yet the roads and infrastucture is getting put more and more towards them, not the need of the modern British motorist.