Dealer cockup

photon

Suspended / Banned
Messages
5,123
Edit My Images
Yes
I bought an item by Buy It Now from the fleabay outlet of a well-known emporium. It was 60 per cent below the usual price elsewhere, but not listed on their website so, although described as new, I thought maybe it was a sample of something they weren't going to stock. Plenty of others had looked at the page over the three weeks the item had been listed.

When I paid I added a note that I was expecting the as-described and as-pictured item to be sent, and not the cheaper older version with a similar name.

When it arrived it was the older version, which is available over 20 per cent cheaper elsewhere in a sale, but is usually 30 to 40 per cent more than I'd paid. I wouldn't really be interested in this version, even if it had the further 20 per cent knocked off.

The seller was apologetic and has arranged a courier to collect the item and asks if there's anything else they can help me with to make up for it.

Well, forgetting about postage, if I asked for a roughly equivalent product from another manufacturer, their usual price is 5 per cent higher than the cheapest well-known sellers and if they supplied it for the price I've paid it would be a discount of 47 per cent.

It would be less of a loss to them than if I could hold them to supplying the advertised item, but they'd still be losing over £150 off their published price.

I can but ask; the alternative item isn't immediately available from them which gives them some time to think about it. But I had assumed there was a major cockup in their fleabay listing so I'm ambivalent about baying for my pound of flesh.

Sorry for waffling on and talking in percentages instead of brass farthings, and for not revealing to y'all the name of who was at fault, but what would you do and how much of a discount would you press for? Or would you forgive the mistake and let the matter drop? I have bought from them in the past, but not regularly and nothing of much value.
 
hold out for the correct item???
 
Predictably, they won't supply the alternative (out of stock cos it's so popular, and it's more expensive than the as-supplied item).

It sounds as though they will be stocking the as-advertised item and will refund in full on receipt of the return and find out what discount can be offered when they have stock.

I'll stick with the refund and be quite thankful I didn't get saddled with a product with design compromises despite the new feature. The alternative manufacturer's product had a similar feature but with less of a compromise in other areas.

I don't think I'll bother with feedback, and will only buy from them in future if their price is the best. Recently they refused my fleabay Best Offer and then later sold at a lower price to someone else.

A couple of years ago, Jessop's fleabay store had one of those crappy 28-300mm superzooms which I wanted for a papping opportunity. Sigma had just updated it and reduced the lens-cap diameter, and I got assurance that the advertised lens had the new 62mm (IIRC) size. Lens arrived and it was the old stock with 67mm. Credit to Jessop's that they arranged for collection of the lens and supplied the correct one, at a loss to them of over £100. Nevertheless, Jessop's have tried to palm me off with old stock on several occasions.
 
eBay won't support you if you try to hold the seller to the original deal, they'll expect you to take the refund offered and will just play dumb if you try to get anything else.
 
Yup, and if I'd gone thru the PayPauper Significantly-Not-As-Described process, it would've been me who had to pay for return postage!

Not having much luck with fleabay transactions at the mo: I've just returned a lens which wouldn't AF over part of its range. I suppose the buyer having to pay the return postage helps discourage frivolous claims, but it's damned annoying when the seller has tried to pull a fast one.
 
Update on this:

The contact at the very well-known company was making lots of nice noises which didn't add up to much. I got them to arrange for collection of the item and its delivery was confirmed yesterday a.m. and I was told the refund would be processed later that day.

I didn't reply but thought it was spivvy of them not to do the refund there and then.

No refund had arrived this morning so I launched a PayPal complaint which resulted in immediate attention and hopefully a rap over someone's knuckles.

At least it didn't cost me a tenner to return the item due to their mistakes, because I negotiated with the seller before making the formal complaint thru Paypal.
 
Good on you Photon, the more people raise complaints, the sooner these traders will leanr. I#ve never had that sort of issue, but I placed a rather large order (£200+) through a big importer and distributor of OMP racing car parts. 4 weeks later after no parts and no conatc (nor replies) I finally got a message saying that they'd had trouble getitng the part from Italy. They were forced by paypal to refund all costs as their listing had said the part was in stock and ready for dispatch. These were also a very cheap outlet, sometimes half the price of other shops.

It seems that these dealers who offer insanely low prices think that the low price is an excse for poor service :shrug:
 
This is a company I don't deal with much cos their prices aren't usually competitive. They acknowledged their mistake, but maybe they sent the item hoping they could fob me off with it? I did alert them to their potential description error when I paid, and maybe I could be accused of trying it on, but they could've got major brownie points by sticking to the deal or supplying an alternative of roughly the same value.
 
I think it's bad they can't be forced to supply the item they advertised. Can trading standards do anything in a situation like this?
 
Back
Top