It started quite a while ago, but I doubt if there will be a 'huge migration'. Most people don't really seem to care, or accept the state's assurances that some erosion of personal privacy is the price they have to pay for safety and security. Of course, you have nothing to worry about if you're not doing anything wrong...
yeah i downloaded Tor on the back on the program last night and gave it a go. Didnt notice any speed drops at all. You have to wonder how secure it is though, since the US developed it youd think they would realise how secure it would naturally be and build in some backdoors. Anyway, i went back to Chrome as that has all my bookmarks in it![]()
They lack the computing power to crack public key encryption with a reasonable key length in a timely fashion. The whole world combined lacks the computing power.trouble with using tor and encryptors etc is it just signals that you have something to hide this attracting attention - if anyone seriously believes that the NSA/GCHQ can't crack anything that's available commercially they've been believing too much hype
I use TOR on a daily basis as my ISP blocks certain sites I want to go to.
I'm now really curious what website is being blocked by your isp that you visit on a daily basis.
Maybe I've not lived, however I've never come across a blocked website.
Has little to do with the government, other than they "advise" on some sites (usually the well known ones in the news). And legal cases from media outlets. But afaik they aren't obliged to block anything?Yes, I can imagine that. Chasg was suggesting he needs to use something legally on a daily basis and can't unless he goes underground. I'm just curious what that actually is and why the government blocks it.
Sorry contrary to popular belief I don't live 24/7 on here. Im on holiday and the cats needed feeding.So choose a different ISP then? Still interested in actual specific examples which nobody seems to be able to give.
EG talktalk blocked order-order.comIt isn't just you who have to answer NeilI just find it fascinating that people can very quickly say about all these sites are are blocked and drive them to go underground. Yet nobody can actually name one.
This is not specifically directed to you, just a general observation that I find fascinating.
Further more it is coming out to light that actually it may be an individual decision by a an individual ISP. So if that is the case why not just talk with your money and switch. It really is easy to switch ISP. Whether it is overkill all depends. For me if I had to go daily about bypassing normal routing for nothing illegal I would change. However that is a personal decision.
I'm just curious about what the legal unwanted sites are and what I'm missing out on.
A Porsche car dealership, two feminist websites, a blog on the Syrian War and the Guido Fawkes political site are among the domains that have fallen foul of the recently installed filters.
The only use ive found for proxies is some american TV channels online offerings are limited to servers based in america - so a NY based proxyserver allows you to watch them ( I've also heard that some previously banned members use them for troling forums after the green team block their isp )
It isn't just you who have to answer NeilI just find it fascinating that people can very quickly say about all these sites are are blocked and drive them to go underground. Yet nobody can actually name one.
etc.
I doubt the green team would block a whole isp due to a banned member!
I know, I looked and appreciated it.There is a list in the link I put in my post #13
E.g. one is The Pirate Bay. Google that name then go to the site.
When I try to connect I get "Virgin Media has received an order from the Courts requiring us to prevent access to this site in order to help protect against copyright infringement."
Fair enough regarding the speed issues. I wonder what the privacy need is to use that on a daily basis on the dark net for a genuine legal basis.As I am using the TOR for privacy do you really think I am going to say which sites I use on an open forum?
My comment was primarily to state that I have had no speed issues
I've done it before mod'ing another forum.I doubt the green team would block a whole isp due to a banned member!
I wonder what the privacy need is to use that on a daily basis on the dark net for a genuine legal basis.

If I remember rightly it was that the traffic for a few ISP went through a couple of servers almost like a proxy (and they didn't pass through the client ip) so that multiple users appeared to have the same originating ip.it depends whether they have a fixed isp address or not - if they do they can block the adress without blocking the whole isp
I guess he has certain specaialised needs![]()
If I remember rightly it was that the traffic for a few ISP went through a couple of servers almost like a proxy (and they didn't pass through the client ip) so that multiple users appeared to have the same originating ip.
I remember those 0800 dialersWe ran into that behaviour many years ago, our /var/log/apache/access.log (long time ago, hence not apache2) occasionally showed incongruous duplicate IP addresses which traced back to ISP proxies. Back when BT Internet were doing the 0800 dialup number between 6am and midnight, before surftime or ADSL, this could happen to people using their service (this was in late 1999 / early 2000 as I recall).
Cleanfeed does something similar.