bsmotorsport
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 918
- Name
- Stephen
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Bit of a long shot but has anyone any experience of the above combo? Im coming from a D200 with my 70-200VR and noticing the lack of length
going FX from DX. Thinking a TC will help me out and gain me a bit in the process. I understand theres a drop in f number with the 2x but at that length i.e. 140-400 I doubt I'll really need f2.8? What are peoples thoughts, should I sell up and go sigma 120-300? Is there a noticable drop in quality using the TC? Is this new III version any better than the II. Sorry for all the questions, its not something I anticipated so didnt read too much in to.
thanks
Steve
going FX from DX. Thinking a TC will help me out and gain me a bit in the process. I understand theres a drop in f number with the 2x but at that length i.e. 140-400 I doubt I'll really need f2.8? What are peoples thoughts, should I sell up and go sigma 120-300? Is there a noticable drop in quality using the TC? Is this new III version any better than the II. Sorry for all the questions, its not something I anticipated so didnt read too much in to.thanks
Steve