Current kit getting to heavy

Rocket

CTID
Suspended / Banned
Messages
2,946
Name
Tony
Edit My Images
Yes
Needing some help.
My Nikon kit is getting some what heavy to carry around, so am tempted to change to a lighter decent quality kit.
My main interest is landscapes but do some portraits and find myself some times shooting the odd wildlife shot as well.

The Fuji looks like a good but not quite sure.

All the reading has not helped. Can you guys and gals offer any advise or help in a possible change, to move or to stay. Thanks in advance.

Current Kit,
Nikon D700.
Tamron 24-70.
Nikon 70-200.
Cosina 19-35.
Nikon 50mm
190XPROB
 
Do you really need a change , Body with lens around your neck , Ruck sack type bag with tripod holder , Sorted , Maybe leave one lens at home

Or do you WANT a change more than NEED a change :D
 
I bought a Fuji X-E1 and 18-55mm about four years ago, delighted with the quality from such a light outfit.
Realised how weighty my Canon FF gear was and how often it was getting left at home with the Fuji in my rucksack.

Wasn't long before I sold the Canon gear and bought the then new X-T1 and a few lenses, no regrets at all
 
I don't think tat I can help as that lot is lighter than my most used lens!

Perhaps a better carrying solution?
 
I think I have got to the age, lighter is going to be better, carrying this gear in my Lowepro Flipside 450 around Derbyshire a few days ago was quite a task, even when I left the 70-200 out.
Having recently been diagnosed with tremors, its getting hard to hold D700 + Tamron 24-70 for any length of time. So I feel this might have to be a must rather than want to, or perhaps go back to a crop camera with lighter lenses maybe, Just very unsure at the moment..
 
Keep the DSLR and zoom for portraits and your occasional wildlife foray, look to something lighter for the landscapes and everyday carry. Fuji is a good option, as would be a premium large sensor zoom compact, or as an alternative/oddball choice something from Sigma with a Foveon sensor.
 
I think I have got to the age, lighter is going to be better, carrying this gear in my Lowepro Flipside 450 around Derbyshire a few days ago was quite a task, even when I left the 70-200 out.
Having recently been diagnosed with tremors, its getting hard to hold D700 + Tamron 24-70 for any length of time. So I feel this might have to be a must rather than want to, or perhaps go back to a crop camera with lighter lenses maybe, Just very unsure at the moment..

I think you need to think about how you view your pictures and the quality you want to see. For example do you print and if so how big or do you view mostly on screen? Do you crop and if so are your crops relatively minor just to straighten the horizon etc or do you carry out heavy crops? Can you resist pixel peeping? If you can assess your needs realistically and honestly you may find you'll be happy with anything newer than your D700 with a 1" or larger sensor or you may decide to restrict your choices to the more compact APS-C and FF options.

Personally and for several reasons I'd avoid Fuji and look at compact system cameras with either in body stabilisation or stabilised lenses from either Micro Four Thirds, the Sony A6xxx series or even a Sony A7 but the bulk of the lenses creeps up with the A7 if you're looking at longer lenses. I bought into MFT when the system first came out and when I first went out with a Panasonic G1 instead of my Canon 5D I honestly had to keep checking the bag to make sure it was still in there such was the drop in weight.

If you're tempted to look at MFT you get the choice of mini SLR or mini RF style cameras, I can recommend the Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8 and the Olympus 25mm f1.8 and 9-18mm and that just leaves a longer lens.
 
There are lighter options within Nikon.

Nikon D610
Nikon 18-35mm
Nikon 70-300mm VR
Nikon 85mm F1.8

Done.

You wouldn't need to carry the 85mm when shooting landscapes and you wouldn't really need to carry either of the others when you're shooting portraits. If you did need a wider portrait lens then the 35/2 could be an option.
 
I think I have got to the age, lighter is going to be better, carrying this gear in my Lowepro Flipside 450 around Derbyshire a few days ago was quite a task, even when I left the 70-200 out.
Having recently been diagnosed with tremors, its getting hard to hold D700 + Tamron 24-70 for any length of time. So I feel this might have to be a must rather than want to, or perhaps go back to a crop camera with lighter lenses maybe, Just very unsure at the moment..

Fifteen years ago my doctor warned me that the best I could expect from exercise at my age was to slow down the rate at which I was losing strength, rather than increasing it. Well, it certainly has proven to be very much more difficult than it used to be to get any stronger. On the other hand as I aged I'd been very gradually getting fatter for decades. Everyone except me thought that was a good thing, because everyone except me had always thought I'd been too skinny.

I discovered that losing a stone of fat (6.4 Kgs for you youngsters) wasn't too hard, using the old traditional method of walking more and eating less while boosting protein intake and doing a bit of weight lifting so as not to lose muscle at the same time. That meant that when I was carrying 6kgs of camera gear in a backpack I was in fact carrying less total weight than when I was overweight and carrying nothing. Plus despite my doctor's warning I had also got a bit stronger.

On the other hand several years ago I badly damaged my right hand and ankle when falling down stairs. Nothing broken despite horrid crack from the ankle. The ankle took about six months to recover to normal slightly limping walking duties and about two years to return to apparently as good as new. The hand alas took about two years to recover maybe half its previous grip strength, and hasn't improved any more than that. As a result I simply can't hand hold my crop sensor DSLR at all with a big lens on it, and not for very long with a small lens on it. Supporting a lot of the weight with the left hand doesn't take enough of the right hand grip strain away.

I tried special hand braces in combination with camera hand straps, but they didn't work well enough and were too clumsy. I discovered to my surprise that screwing my camera onto my folded up big monopod, while it made the total hand holding weight a lot bigger, offered such a nice big fat cylindrical foam cushioned grip on the upper part of the monopod that I was able to take all of the weight of the camera when held up to the eye with the left hand, leaving the right just to stabilise and control. It was also oddly much easier to carry the whole weight of camera. monopod, and big lens, hanging down comfortably in either hand, using that big fat cylindrical grip. I found I could walk around for hours hand carrying camera, monopod, and big lens, just by regularly swopping from hand to hand to stop muscle fatigue. By adding a longer quick release bracket to the camera with two tripod holes in it I could also attach both the 'pod and a cross shoulder tripod hole mounted sling strap for easy hands free quickly accessible carry.

Note that I'm not talking about extending the monopod to rest its foot on the ground, although that's a convenient option to have. I'm simply talking about using the monopod as a big fat comfy carrying handle which lets me take all the hold-up-to-the-eye weight off my damaged right hand. In fact I'll often extend the monopod just a tiny bit so that the foot tucks nicely into my trouser belt for longer hand holding sessions with a big lens on the camera.

As a bonus to this use of a folded up monopod just as a weight-bearing handle, the extra weight and even greater added rotational inertia of the added hand held monopod gives quite a useful bit of extra camera stability to my hand held shots, especially with longer lenses.

In sum by losing the same weight of fat as my usual reasonably loaded camera gear bag, and adding a monopod as an easy weight bearing carry handle to take the weight away from my damaged right hand, I'm managing to comfortably carry around a lot more camera for much longer distances than fifteen years ago, when overwork behind a desk had turned me into a panting easily fatigued chubby slob who couldn't walk for more than half an hour without needed a snack break.

I'm now 75, by the way. Overworking at a desk job I'd not only got weak and fat, I'd developed diabetes and had a heart attack. Trying to hang on behind the desk to maximise my pension had started to seem like it might be rather risky project. Retiring early to lose the desk, walk more, and lose weight quite possibly saved my life.
 
I swapped to Fuji to lighten the weight and still get good results.

I wasn't happy with the results so have gone back to a full frame system and love it again.

You wouldn't believe the weight of my backpack.

But the results are back to what I think are acceptable.

Try before you switch - a lot.
 
I swapped to Fuji to lighten the weight and still get good results.

I wasn't happy with the results so have gone back to a full frame system and love it again.

You wouldn't believe the weight of my backpack.

But the results are back to what I think are acceptable.

Try before you switch - a lot.

But how much of your unhappiness was due to the Fuji look and processing issues and how much was due to switching from FF to APS-C?

I like the look of the Fuji's and the manual dials look good but potential issues with "the look" and processing put me off and if going for a compact and lighter APS-C system I'd rather go for the Sony Axxxx series despite some holes in the lens line up. Other than that IMO MFT is good and the body and lens line up give a lot of choices.
 
This might not help you but i bougth a XT1 with 35mm f2 as a taste in the water first. I like this fuji combo and end up selling my nikon system, this consist of d700, d3 and 2.8 zooms and 1.4 prime.

I now shoot with 2 fuji with lens attach and it is still lighter then a d3 with 24-70.
 
You are talking about the weight of your kit. What is the weight of your Lowepro bag? I have the Pro Trekker 650 AW at home which I store all my kit in. Empty the bag weighs over 4KG!!! In my humble opinion you have 4 lenses when you could use just an 18-300 zoom. Some of your focal lengths overlap, if you want to keep to 2 lenses why not review the lenses you have and go for 2 zooms that offer the focal ranges you require? Like you I have DX format bodies and find that the 18-300 F5.6 does for an awful lot of situations. NOTE: If you do go for an 18-300 Nikon zoom buy the faster lens as it is much sharper. Nikon do 2 and the slower lens is a lot softer.
 
Thanks Chris for the detailed issues.
My self, I have had valve replacement, and various other conditions which have left me with disabilities. I am not over weight, but my main issue is holding camera and lens. There have been some helpful ideas here, so will be looking more in-depth of what I am going to carry.

Fifteen years ago my doctor warned me that the best I could expect from exercise at my age was to slow down the rate at which I was losing strength, rather than increasing it. Well, it certainly has proven to be very much more difficult than it used to be to get any stronger. On the other hand as I aged I'd been very gradually getting fatter for decades. Everyone except me thought that was a good thing, because everyone except me had always thought I'd been too skinny.

I discovered that losing a stone of fat (6.4 Kgs for you youngsters) wasn't too hard, using the old traditional method of walking more and eating less while boosting protein intake and doing a bit of weight lifting so as not to lose muscle at the same time. That meant that when I was carrying 6kgs of camera gear in a backpack I was in fact carrying less total weight than when I was overweight and carrying nothing. Plus despite my doctor's warning I had also got a bit stronger.

On the other hand several years ago I badly damaged my right hand and ankle when falling down stairs. Nothing broken despite horrid crack from the ankle. The ankle took about six months to recover to normal slightly limping walking duties and about two years to return to apparently as good as new. The hand alas took about two years to recover maybe half its previous grip strength, and hasn't improved any more than that. As a result I simply can't hand hold my crop sensor DSLR at all with a big lens on it, and not for very long with a small lens on it. Supporting a lot of the weight with the left hand doesn't take enough of the right hand grip strain away.

I tried special hand braces in combination with camera hand straps, but they didn't work well enough and were too clumsy. I discovered to my surprise that screwing my camera onto my folded up big monopod, while it made the total hand holding weight a lot bigger, offered such a nice big fat cylindrical foam cushioned grip on the upper part of the monopod that I was able to take all of the weight of the camera when held up to the eye with the left hand, leaving the right just to stabilise and control. It was also oddly much easier to carry the whole weight of camera. monopod, and big lens, hanging down comfortably in either hand, using that big fat cylindrical grip. I found I could walk around for hours hand carrying camera, monopod, and big lens, just by regularly swopping from hand to hand to stop muscle fatigue. By adding a longer quick release bracket to the camera with two tripod holes in it I could also attach both the 'pod and a cross shoulder tripod hole mounted sling strap for easy hands free quickly accessible carry.

Note that I'm not talking about extending the monopod to rest its foot on the ground, although that's a convenient option to have. I'm simply talking about using the monopod as a big fat comfy carrying handle which lets me take all the hold-up-to-the-eye weight off my damaged right hand. In fact I'll often extend the monopod just a tiny bit so that the foot tucks nicely into my trouser belt for longer hand holding sessions with a big lens on the camera.

As a bonus to this use of a folded up monopod just as a weight-bearing handle, the extra weight and even greater added rotational inertia of the added hand held monopod gives quite a useful bit of extra camera stability to my hand held shots, especially with longer lenses.

In sum by losing the same weight of fat as my usual reasonably loaded camera gear bag, and adding a monopod as an easy weight bearing carry handle to take the weight away from my damaged right hand, I'm managing to comfortably carry around a lot more camera for much longer distances than fifteen years ago, when overwork behind a desk had turned me into a panting easily fatigued chubby slob who couldn't walk for more than half an hour without needed a snack break.

I'm now 75, by the way. Overworking at a desk job I'd not only got weak and fat, I'd developed diabetes and had a heart attack. Trying to hang on behind the desk to maximise my pension had started to seem like it might be rather risky project. Retiring early to lose the desk, walk more, and lose weight quite possibly saved my life.
 
Thanks all for the replies, some sound advise.
Personally after reading the above,s, I think I have a few options .

1 Stop carrying so much stuff. Take only what I need for one particular shoot.
2 Make more use of my monopod also get a lighter tripod and head.
3 Change over to a lighter system completely.
4 Keep my gear and purchase something like suggested, XT-1 and lens, Try and see how I get along.
 
You are damn right about that mate. Changing to a mirrorless system is a pretty big step in my opinion. Specially you invest quite alot on FF body and lens etc. Buy use is a good option to test the mirrorless system, if it didn't work out, you won't lose alot of money. When I change system I had the option to buy XT2 or Xpro2 with 1-2 lens, but I end up buying the XT1 and XE2s with 4 lens. I rather have more quality lens then a newer body because body comes and go but not your lens.
 
Back
Top