CRB checks and child photography....

stan the man

Nutkicker
Suspended / Banned
Messages
7,299
Name
mark
Edit My Images
Yes
right,i was talking casually to my hairdresser(and coach to a childrens rugby team) today whilst having a trim,when the subject of childs rugby/football/photography came up.basically,what i want to know is do i,or should i need to get the CRB check to photograph children playing rugby or soccer?

he has said he will speak to the parents of the children with regards to photographing them,but also said i will need to get a CRB check,as has all of the people involved with the running of the club.

thanks in advance...
 
Okies ....

Firstly, you ONLY need a CRB check if you are to be left unattended with the children. If this is not the case, you do not need one. That said, the rugby club may prefer it if you did.

Also, definitely speak with the parents - just to let them know who you are and why you are taking shots .... it will keep everyone much happier and you never know, you may even be able to sell them some ;)

Anth
 
You do not need a crb check to photograph the kids

but


if the club wanted these pics and they are willing to do the crb check that can only be to your favour.

that would keep the parents happy and if the parents are happy the club is happy.
 
I've volunteered to be a tog at Quidenham Children's Hospices' events.

One of the things they require is that I need to be CRB checked, which I believe they're in the process of applying for..
 
The rugby club could get him a crb check

[as i said in my previous post]
 
markta ----you should know if your being crb checked because you have to fill out and send the forms off.
 
thanks guys...basically,i would like to get some experience of sports photography,including rugby and soccer.i know i can just go along to a senior game and photograph them(with permission of course),but it would be good to photograph youngsters playing too....

as said,the coach will speak to the parents first..then if they're happy for me to photograph them..i will go along and introduce myself and explain why i want to take the shots.

i'm not a pro,and would barely call myself amateur..hence needing some experience.i'm also not self employed..so i presume the club will have to run the CRB check.

i will not be left unattended with them,and will only probably be taking shots from pitchside,or perhaps group shots of the team..start of season etc....
 
i will not be left unattended with them,and will only probably be taking shots from pitchside,or perhaps group shots of the team..start of season etc....

In which case you do not need a CRB check.

Still be a good idea to get parental consent.

Anth
 
On CRB checks i had one about 2 years ago, do you need to do them regularly or do they last for x amount of time.
 
Technically, they don't last at all.

They are simply a record of the time that they were taken ... i.e. if you had one today and you got the all clear ... it does not mean you are clear tomorrow as in between now and then you could commit a crime.

Where i work (as a teacher in a primary school), we have them every 12months - that said, my boss always states that a CRB check does not mean you have not committed a crime - it just means you've never been caught!
Anth
 
My friend is a trainee Mental Health Nurse, and they had to have the CRB checks done before they went on placement.
Her tutor said that even cautions show up, to which my friend argued that its a lie, and they dont.
When my friend was challenged on how she knew she went "I got cautioned by the police, have all the relevant paperwork, and I think you'll find its not on my CRB" :D Lol
 
My friend is a trainee Mental Health Nurse, and they had to have the CRB checks done before they went on placement.
Her tutor said that even cautions show up, to which my friend argued that its a lie, and they dont.
When my friend was challenged on how she knew she went "I got cautioned by the police, have all the relevant paperwork, and I think you'll find its not on my CRB" :D Lol

That just goes to show how crap the Police are at paperwork then

First record box on a Standard Disclosure says...

Police records of Convictions, Cautions, Reprimands and Final Warnings

DD
 
As I'm an ice hockey coach I have my CRB checked every 12 months. However to any other organisation, sports group, etc this is irrelevant as each new organisation needs to apply for one. You shouldn't assume either that because you have one then you will be granted access to photograph childrens sporting events as they can still tell you it doesn't meet their criteria sufficiently.
 
Unfortunately CRB checks seem to be another example of common sense gone mad. As others have pointed out, they mean very little because they only give a snapshot of someone's past on the day that the check was carried out. If someone gives a false date of birth they can 'lose' their history anyway.

I don't have a CRB but I do have a class 1 Firearms certificate, which is only issued after very stringent checks and which would be withdrawn immediately if I commited any crime. That makes it far more meaningful than any CRB check BUT a local authority which wanted me to teach lighting to adult students (free) says that I can't teach them because I won't agree to be CRB checked. I pointed out that there is no need for me to be checked because (a) their students are neither children nor vulnerable adults and (b) because I won't be left unsupervised with them but they were adamant, so I told them what to do with their unpaid job...

I have a daughter who is a midwife. As such she needs an enhanced CRB. When she changed jobs the checks had to be done by the new employer and due to an admin c*up it took 9 months to come through - and during that time she wasn't allowed to be on her own with any patients!
 
CRB checks are not a cheap option for employers, and in my view are used far to often and needleslly. The media has created a nation of paranoid parents, when your kids are adults and ask why they have no photos of there school play or there sporting achievements, you can tell them its the over zelous beaurocrats. People who are intent on creating mountains of paperwork and regulations to justify there posts. Todays news an extra 13000 local council jobs created this year.:eek:
 
i have worked with children with special needs since i was 14. and have subsequently had a crb check done every year. you cant give a fake date of birth as your driving licence or passport have to be seen when you send off your paperwork. i also know of people who have not been allowed to work with children when they wanted to because they had done some disgusting things in their pasts. so to say its common sense gone mad is a bit of an ignorant comment in my opinion.

you do not need a crb check if you will not be in direct cotact with the children, but as said above parentl consent would be good. get the club to write up a disclaimer form for partens to sign so you can cover our back.
 
Anything that tries to keep kids safe can only be a good thing.

My sons school have never stopped us taking photos or videos at school sports days and plays ect.

If one parent objects then MAYBE that child should be removed from the activity as not to spoil it for 450 others.
 
i agree, i personally think that taking 20minutes to fill ou a form is nothing when it can protect a child. to me it makes no difference if it makes jobs that people think are "needless", if 1 child i spared the horror of abuse its worth it
 
I certainly don't have a problem with anything that actually does help to keep kids safe. My problem is with the jobsworth attitude that everyone who has any contact with anyone in their charge MUST have a CRB check, even when there is no risk and no need for it
 
but then you can look a it like this threadstarter did....its better safe than sorry, and it also gives an imployer an idea on your past...which maybe they have no right to know but ca help them keep a "clean reliable staff"
 
My Crb is valid for 3yrs as a bus driver if that helps.
 
i agree, i personally think that taking 20minutes to fill ou a form is nothing when it can protect a child. to me it makes no difference if it makes jobs that people think are "needless", if 1 child i spared the horror of abuse its worth it

If you really want to stop child abuse then get all parents and family members checked as they commit most offences.

Victoria Climbie
Baby P
Shannon Mathews





I do agree with jolsterj , exclude children from events whose parents object to photos of school sports days or plays and so-on.
 
The only really stupid thing with CRB and Enhanced Disclosure SCotland is that you have to have a separate check done for each organisation you work with.

That is nothing less than stealth tax raising yet again.
 
It is bureaucracy gone mad, I went for a job and had a brand spanking new enhanced CRB which had dropped through my letterbox that same morning.

I was told by my prospective employer that I had to have a standard CRB to work for them and would have to apply again and I would have to pay for it !!

Needless to say I did not take their job offer up,,

I wonder how much protection they actually give anyway ?
 
>>I wonder how much protection they actually give anyway ?

About as much protection as an MoT... however it does give the organisation a defence (of some sort) against a claim of negligence "We didn't know he was a P****, cos we did a crb check and it came up clean"

B.
 
On CRB checks i had one about 2 years ago, do you need to do them regularly or do they last for x amount of time.


CRB checks are valid for three years.


My friend is a trainee Mental Health Nurse, and they had to have the CRB checks done before they went on placement.
Her tutor said that even cautions show up, to which my friend argued that its a lie, and they dont.
When my friend was challenged on how she knew she went "I got cautioned by the police, have all the relevant paperwork, and I think you'll find its not on my CRB" :D Lol


Cautions should show up but it depends on when and where the offence happened. I have CRB checks regularly because of the work I do. I also have a caution from 1983 that never comes back on the paperwork. I always put it down because (a) I know had a caution (b) because prior to the CRB system being introduced it showed up on the Police Checks I used to have and I had to be interviewed every time about the offence (c) The minute I don't put it down it will come back on a CRB and I will have to explain.


i have worked with children with special needs since i was 14. and have subsequently had a crb check done every year. you cant give a fake date of birth as your driving licence or passport have to be seen when you send off your paperwork. i also know of people who have not been allowed to work with children when they wanted to because they had done some disgusting things in their pasts. so to say its common sense gone mad is a bit of an ignorant comment in my opinion.

you do not need a crb check if you will not be in direct cotact with the children, but as said above parentl consent would be good. get the club to write up a disclaimer form for partens to sign so you can cover our back.


I also have to undertake CRB checks on people as well as a variety of other checks / investigations. I agree with you. Some of the offences that I come across where people have attempted to access children / young people would surprise 'Joe Public' who generally get most of their information in relation to child protection from certain sections of the media. People also have very short memories. Remember the reason the CRB / checking system was tightened up. Ian Huntley had slipped through and was working as a caretaker at a school! Ask the people involved in that case or any of the victims families whether they think checks are a waste of time!


If you really want to stop child abuse then get all parents and family members checked as they commit most offences.

Victoria Climbie
Baby P
Shannon Mathews


I do agree with jolsterj , exclude children from events whose parents object to photos of school sports days or plays and so-on.


Unfortunately it is a sad fact of life that most abuse towards children happens within the home and by family members. It is also a fact that the minute any professional tries to 'meddle' in family lives they are castigated for being over zealous. When something goes wrong they are castigated for not doing enough.

It is interesting that the three cases mentioned above are deemed to be newsworthy. There are hundreds of children that lose their lives every year in this country at the hands of abusive adults that do not make the headlines for a variety of reasons. They are anonymous to most, but not to the people that are involved in these cases.

CRB checks are one form of trying to make a safer society for our children. But until everyone accepts that as a society in the UK today we fail children regularly and we all begin to take collective responsibility we will always have debates like these about something as low level as a CRB check.

The debate about Baby P will go on because it is topical and everyone has a view on it. Eventually a full report will be published and recommendations made as there always are and most of these will not be put into place because the Government will not provide the monies. I often hear 'Joe Public' talk about the Victoria Climbie case. How many people have actually read the full report and understand what happened?

If anyone is that interested I will post it out to them at my own expense. I have lots of full reports from lots of tragic cases if anyone is interested in getting to the facts.

For now I would just be happy to have people accept that there are occasions when people working with children need to have a CRB in place. For those that think this is beaurocracy gone mad, have a look at the level of beaurocracy that people working within the child protection services have to deal with on a daily basis, scared of making a mistake, and also having to deal with attitudes that are contradictory in nature from Joe Public.

Chris :)
 
CRB checks are valid for three years.

It is interesting that the three cases mentioned above are deemed to be newsworthy. There are hundreds of children that lose their lives every year in this country at the hands of abusive adults that do not make the headlines for a variety of reasons. They are anonymous to most, but not to the people that are involved in these cases.

Chris :)

I'm a bit puzzled by this statement about 'hundreds of children' lose their lives every year in the UK due to abusive adults? What do you mean?
 
markta ----you should know if your being crb checked because you have to fill out and send the forms off.

Yep, am awaiting the authority form etc. which I will complete, the hospice have said that they will then send it off for me once returned
 
I'm a bit puzzled by this statement about 'hundreds of children' lose their lives every year in the UK due to abusive adults? What do you mean?

up to 4 children die per WEEK as a result of abuse or niglect
 
I'm a bit puzzled by this statement about 'hundreds of children' lose their lives every year in the UK due to abusive adults? What do you mean?

up to 4 children die per WEEK as a result of abuse or niglect


s-leeson got it in his comments above. Have a look at the stats in relation to child deaths in the UK.

As I alluded to in my earlier post sometimes we have to take a more detailed look at the issue of child protection and our attitudes toward children in general. Everyone quite rightly gets upset and outraged at cases such as the Baby P situation. Unfortunately there are many more.

I gave up a very long time ago trying to dispell some of the myths about the complexities and legalities of the CP system. About the time that I worked on my first case where a child was murdered (6 months old)! That wasn't my last by the way.

I still think about one of the comments from a neighbour at the time about when asked why she didn't pick a phone up and call someone. She said "I don't like the police all they do is stitch you up and why would I call the Social........they just take your kids away"

Think about that statement for a while it may raise a few uncomfortable questions about responsibility and attitudes.


Chris
 
You do not need a crb check to photograph the kids

but


if the club wanted these pics and they are willing to do the crb check that can only be to your favour.

that would keep the parents happy and if the parents are happy the club is happy.

You only need a CRB check if you are working ie as a volunteer with children, when i photograph groups, I ask the parents to all sign a book saying if they are okay for me to have them included in the photograph or not. then i have written proof should anything go wrong.

Hope this helps.
 
Remember the reason the CRB / checking system was tightened up. Ian Huntley had slipped through and was working as a caretaker at a school! Ask the people involved in that case or any of the victims families whether they think checks are a waste of time!

The Huntley case is often quoted on child protection issues, but how much difference would it have made if he had been checked. The two girls did not go to his house to see the caretaker, they went to see Maxine Carr their teaching assistant who had no past issues with children.
 
The Huntley case is often quoted on child protection issues, but how much difference would it have made if he had been checked. The two girls did not go to his house to see the caretaker, they went to see Maxine Carr their teaching assistant who had no past issues with children.

I suppose if his previous 'actions' were made available to the CRB check, then maybe he wouldn't have been employed as the caretaker :)
 
I suppose if his previous 'actions' were made available to the CRB check, then maybe he wouldn't have been employed as the caretaker :)

The point is they would have gone to that house even if he had worked elsewhere and never had any previous contact with them.
 
I thought it was a specific caretakers house?
 
>>CRB checks are valid for three years.

Which makes them, IMHO, worthless. Someone could get a CRB and then, the next day, go out and commit any sort of offence, which if undetected, wouldn't appear on their CRB. In fact naive people may say "S/He has a clean CRB, it can't possibly be them" which, in the worst case, could be a fatal assumption.

Perhaps they are better than nothing - mostly by a sort of deterrent effect I guess but they are definitely not the holy grail of vetting which is how some people appear to treat them.

B.
 
>>CRB checks are valid for three years.

Which makes them, IMHO, worthless. Someone could get a CRB and then, the next day, go out and commit any sort of offence, which if undetected, wouldn't appear on their CRB. In fact naive people may say "S/He has a clean CRB, it can't possibly be them" which, in the worst case, could be a fatal assumption.

Perhaps they are better than nothing - mostly by a sort of deterrent effect I guess but they are definitely not the holy grail of vetting which is how some people appear to treat them.

B.
That's the point I was trying to make. It means nothing, except that the person concerned hadn't been caught at the time that the computer was checked. And it is just a computerised check, no talking to neighbours, workmates or anything else, unlike a Firearms Certificate check, which really does mean something.

As for statements that people can't change their identity by changing their personal details e.g. date of birth, I know of someone who is working as a cab driver (enhanced CRB needed) despite the fact that he was sentenced to 10 years for robbing a bank.

As I remember it, Soham murderer Huntley got a clear CRB check because the police didn't see fit to mention that he had been questioned about a number of rapes but not prosecuted, and then gave the excuse that the data protection act prevented them from providing that information.

In theory, CRB checks are a good thing because, to some extent, they help keep unsuitable people away from the vulnerable - but IMO they should only be required when actually necessary (unsupervised access) and they should only form part of the vetting process.
 
The Huntley case is often quoted on child protection issues, but how much difference would it have made if he had been checked. The two girls did not go to his house to see the caretaker, they went to see Maxine Carr their teaching assistant who had no past issues with children.


Thats a strange take on that particular situation. Huntley had a number of issues in relation to his past conduct that should have flagged him up as a risk to people in general not just children. He should never have had the job in the first place. As Marcel says the children were in his house which was a house provided along with his post as caretaker. If he wasn't in the house because he hadn't got the job I doubt whether the children would have been there to see either Carr or Huntley :thinking:

I have to say I rarely see the Huntley case quoted in child protection discussions / texts / papers, other than in relation to the failing within the checking systems which is why I raised it.


I suppose if his previous 'actions' were made available to the CRB check, then maybe he wouldn't have been employed as the caretaker :)


Got it in one Marcel. It's not to say he wouldn't have offended elsewhere but it was a gap he managed to breeze through at that time that put him in a position he may have been denied with the appropriate checks.


The point is they would have gone to that house even if he had worked elsewhere and never had any previous contact with them.


It was his house. He wouldn't have had the house or the access to the children.


>>CRB checks are valid for three years.

Which makes them, IMHO, worthless. Someone could get a CRB and then, the next day, go out and commit any sort of offence, which if undetected, wouldn't appear on their CRB. In fact naive people may say "S/He has a clean CRB, it can't possibly be them" which, in the worst case, could be a fatal assumption.

Perhaps they are better than nothing - mostly by a sort of deterrent effect I guess but they are definitely not the holy grail of vetting which is how some people appear to treat them.

B.


I agree with most of what you say. I have yet to come across any child care professional that thinks that CRB checks are "the holy grail". Many are worried about the fact that there are people who may slip through the net by only being checked every three years. The problem is that CRB's are what is in place and they have to work with what is in place now. They are one small part of a system that is there to try and protect children and vulnerable people in general.

I think any debate about systems that protect children is healthy so long as it is balanced and people are fully aware of it's strengths and weaknesses.

I often ask Students (who are CRB'd throughout their course and placements) the question "so what would you change and put in place?" I would ask this question to people who think the CRB system is flawed. Given that people think it is not very good and most object to being CRB'd every three years, what is a better system for ensuring that children are protected? I mean at a basic level which is what CRB checks are. How would you do it?

Chris :)
 
Crb checks are only any good if the offender being checked has
previously been caught!
 
Back
Top