Couple sue 20 year old photographer

[BruceMo]

Phil, you didn't know it was for "expenses" only until just a few minutes ago. Come on man. :| :thumbsdown:

Every job you do has " expenses ", by the time she edited the shots as intended, the waiting staff would have been on more per hour. Speaking of which, you wouldn't hire a young lassie looking for experience as a waitress, then expect her to rustle up the dinner, or provide silver service class standards, and if she was making 3 quid an hour on a Saturday, its not reasonable to call her a professional waitress
You would normally expect a lesser standard for a lesser price, in this case, the couple got just about what anyone could reasonably expect imo

 

[Thedodo]

Every job you do has " expenses ", by the time she edited the shots as intended, the waiting staff would have been on more per hour. Speaking of which, you wouldn't hire a young lassie looking for experience as a waitress, then expect her to rustle up the dinner, or provide silver service class standards, and if she was making 3 quid an hour on a Saturday, its not reasonable to call her a professional waitress
You would normally expect a lesser standard for a lesser price, in this case, the couple got just about what anyone could reasonably expect imo

Think you have hit the nail on the head there, it would be a completly different kettle of fish if sge had been portraying herself as a pro

 

[ZoneV]

Come on guys, give it a rest ,agree to disagree and move on.

As a wise shepherd once said, "let's get the flock out of here."



No hard feelings, it's been an interesting discussion - quite an eye-opener.

 

[Marc]

and I think that's the best place to leave it.

Nothing more to see here folks, move along now