When I was young, Barry Sheen and Ron Haslam were household names, strange that the sport has seemingly dropped off the medias radar.Here is a prime example, never in the running for SPOTY, hardly ever mentioned.
![]()
Jonathan Rea - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
When I was young, Barry Sheen and Ron Haslam were household names, strange that the sport has seemingly dropped off the medias radar.
Me too, but its worse here, the ( local) social media is absolutely full of it, as Leah Cathrine Williamson is a local lass,I’m already fed up of hearing about it.
I think I also read that the first womens cricket teams were the ground breakers when they, not the men, stated bowling overarm.......up til then bowling (by both sexes) was underarm!As you probably all know, female football was so popular during and after WW1 that the FA banned it.
Personally I find that a little insulting, implying that being in an age group team is just like going the through motions like passing out of kindergarten.Some people have graduation ceremonies from kindergartens as well.
Age groups are just age groups, it means very little when the move up as adults, some do well but many do not.
Premiership teams contain players from many age groups, even those do not compare with winning national teams.

Hopefully, the ladies will be receiving the same sort of rewards (?BEs etc.) that the men would if they ever reached the same level...
Good for final goal scorer Chloe Kelly for spontaneously following a historic men's tradition by removing a shirt! Discussion here :
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leoDJypMM0Q
.... IMO I think it's the act of a spoilsport to show any player, men or women or whatever, a yellow card for such enthusiastic and exuberant behaviour. What on earth is the justification for disapproving so strongly about it?Looks better when the girls do it, but it still draws a yellow card.
.... IMO I think it's the act of a spoilsport to show any player, men or women or whatever, a yellow card for such enthusiastic and exuberant behaviour. What on earth is the justification for disapproving so strongly about it?
Scoring a goal is emotional, scoring an international match winning goal is emotional. The fans watching the match are emotional. It's all good and healthy.
It was a great game. No alcohol was allowed to be on sale in local shops nor Wembley Way. That decision was a matter of lessons learnt from the men's Euro final in 2020. With the profile of the spectators I wouldn't have thought there would have been any problems anyway. Local shop-keepers/off-licences, complained to Brent Council who made the decision.
What struck me was that all but one player (she came on in the last minutes of extra time) was white. The full squad was 23 players of which only three were non-white. In the 8-0 win over Norway the whole team was white.That's 11 in the starting line-up and five subs. Compare that to the men's England team and the Premiere league clubs. Having said that there's a real lack of British South Asian players in the men's game.
Re the women's team, Serena Wiegman can only work with what she's offered so the problem,it would seem, is down to the scouts but maybe they're limited in choice because of societal barriers re women,in general. Most non-whites live in city centres and often in deprived areas so if a training ground was out of town they may not be able to afford to get there several times a week. I assume they'd have their kit paid for ? Anyway, I thought it was worth mentioning.
Germany has taken the defeat badly.The headline in Bild ( like our Mirror) was "Another Wembley Fraud" They are comparing the lack of a penalty being awarded to them after Leah Williamson appeared to handle the ball in a goalmouth scrum to one of Geoff Hurst's three goals in the 1966 World Cup win. The Germans claimed it didn't go over the line but today's technology shows it did.
I forget which England player, after the final whistle, went to Oberdorf who was sitting on the ground clearly upset and put a hand on her shoulder but Oberdorf pushed it away.
The alcohol issue is a funny one, that has been more of a problem at football than most other sports. I'm a rugby league fan and the local football fans could never understand why we could drink in the stand at Old Trafford and they could not, this may have changed for football now I'm not sure.
Until recently, women have had to pay to play football We've heard the hardship players had to go through in the recent past. This may be a reason why girls or women from more deprived areas have not been playing. Hopefully this will change with the success at the Euros and the more professionalism of women's football.
As for the German player pushing away and England player trying to console her. Maybe she was so upset she just wanted to be left alone 5. 10 minutes later. Probably would not have done the same thing.
Yes., have watched a number of RL games at football stadiums where fans have been allowed to watch with pints in their hands despite signs which say otherwise. The only problem is when a try is scored, said pint is too often shared with everyone else!The alcohol issue is a funny one, that has been more of a problem at football than most other sports. I'm a rugby league fan and the local football fans could never understand why we could drink in the stand at Old Trafford and they could not, this may have changed for football now I'm not sure.
Beer at cricket makes the crowd noisier as the match goes on. If you are in the lower rows of a busy stand you may have to watch out for rivers of spilt beer running down the tiers.
.... Thanks for educating me about that, John - Much appreciated. I only follow the women's football unless it's World Cup and so I'm not familiar with the men's football scene.FIFA banned it,Robin.
1. Time wasting running to the supporters (they do that anyway) and putting it back on.
2. Sometimes players (I'm thinking the men's game here) have a 'vest' on underneath on which is written something either close to their heart..(literally..lol) maybe a message to their wife or a political slogan in support of a particular person or group or related to a particular religion.The latter can lead, in some instances, to problems between teams.
3. When a player scores the cameras zoom in on them and consequently the sponsor's name gets good exposure.They don't want that to be missed as they pay a lot of money for sponsorship.
4.Cultural differences between teams. To a muslim taking off a shirt is an insult to the one who sees it.. Yes..Go figureCulture though, rather than religion...I think.I'm not sure.If it's muslims then it must be religion otherwise it would be ok in some Islamic countries. But what about muslim players here. Mo Saleh (Liverpoo)l for instance. Riyad Mahrez..? (Manchester City)
What struck me was that all but one player (she came on in the last minutes of extra time) was white. The full squad was 23 players of which only three were non-white. In the 8-0 win over Norway the whole team was white.That's 11 in the starting line-up and five subs. Compare that to the men's England team and the Premiere league clubs. Having said that there's a real lack of British South Asian players in the men's game.
Re the women's team, Serena Wiegman can only work with what she's offered so the problem,it would seem, is down to the scouts but maybe they're limited in choice because of societal barriers re women,in general. Most non-whites live in city centres and often in deprived areas so if a training ground was out of town they may not be able to afford to get there several times a week. I assume they'd have their kit paid for ? Anyway, I thought it was worth mentioning.
.... Yes, Germany were far from being sporting throughout the game and weren't shy about fouling English players < Oberdorf in particular. I don't remember either who made a gracious gesture of consolation towards Oberdorf but her reaction just shows she was acting like a spoilt brat.Germany has taken the defeat badly.The headline in Bild ( like our Mirror) was "Another Wembley Fraud" They are comparing the lack of a penalty being awarded to them after Leah Williamson appeared to handle the ball in a goalmouth scrum to one of Geoff Hurst's three goals in the 1966 World Cup win. The Germans claimed it didn't go over the line but today's technology shows it did.
I forget which England player, after the final whistle, went to Oberdorf who was sitting on the ground clearly upset and put a hand on her shoulder but Oberdorf pushed it away.
This is good sentiment, but unfortunatley sentiment doesn’t bring equality of opportunity.I believe strongly that all players in all team sports should be selected on merit and that their ethnicity/colour is entirely irrelevant.
.... Sure, but everything evolves and changes over time as it has done throughout human history and continues to do so. There's no point in dwelling on the inequalities of the past IMO.This is good sentiment, but unfortunatley sentiment doesn’t bring equality of opportunity.
Those of us that have had the privilege of growing up in nurturing environments, surrounded by people like us, don’t really know what it is like to have equality of opportunity for all.
We shouldn’t forget that Women were banned from playing football by the FA for 50 years, until 1971. That’s hardly equality.
Someone might, but many more will not..... Sure, but everything evolves and changes over time as it has done throughout human history and continues to do so. There's no point in dwelling on the inequalities of the past IMO.
Equality of opportunity is also a good sentiment and worthy of striving for but skill is fundamental and essential. The fickle Lady Luck also plays a huge part which should never be underestimated.
If someone wants something badly enough they will probably achieve it regardless of their background - The world of success is littered with such examples.
.... Some will always rise to the top, so what if many more will not - Human beings are competitive by nature. We are all equal but some of us are more equal than others.Someone might, but many more will not.
Looking at the inequalities of the past helps inform changes for the now and the future.
Well, in some circles, many more rise to the top than in others. That is the point of equality of opportunity..... Some will always rise to the top, so what if many more will not - Human beings are competitive by nature. We are all equal but some of us are more equal than others.
A look is all that is necessary. Those who marinate in the past may find their mental health or sense of well being suffers.
We will know when equality is universal.Someone might, but many more will not.
Looking at the inequalities of the past helps inform changes for the now and the future.
Terry, I couldn't agree more! Women's football and especially this milestone Euro 2022 win by the Lionesses will do so much to help the whole structure of opportunities and also beyond football.I find woman's foot ball far more watchable than the men.@TerrywoodenpicTerry, I couldn't agree more! Women's football and especially this milestone Euro 2022 win by the Lionesses will do so much to help the whole structure of opportunities and also beyond football.
Alex Scott's dreams are coming true - Also those of Ian Wright < Major Respect and Hat's Off to them!
The positivity is contagious and feels beautiful! Positivity breeds Positivity and we all know what Negativity breeds.
Some of my friends ask me why I love women's football and are surprised that I do - I love it because of the positive energy and team spirit and the games are entertaining. I get emotional when I see Mead's fancy footwork and she scores and when Russo scored from that cheeky back heel kick I cried with joy.
I find woman's foot ball far more watchable than the men.
The men seem to have all heart and inventiveness trained out of them, for long periods they triangulate the ball to retain it, with out doing anything positive at all. You can only move up the field by passing, and moving into space. This will always involve some risk, but timing and skill moves the balance of risk in the attackers favour. The men's game has become risk averse.
The Ladies seem to have learned this lesson very well. And have proved that they can do it, even against a doubled up rushed defence. As the Germans tried after half time, but gave up that ploy soon after. During the entire competition the English long passing was exceptional.
Someone might, but many more will not.
Looking at the inequalities of the past helps inform changes for the now and the future.
We then have to think about the stadium size if the women's game is going to take off. At the moment, Arsenal Women play at Borehamwood FC, which has a capacity of 4,500 compared to the 82,000 at Wembley on Sunday. Chelsea Women play at Kingsmeadow which has a capacity of 4,800, can anyone see a pattern emerging here?
.... The Black player who came on late is Nikita Parris who is a very fast winger, a great player. I'm sure that coach Serena had good reasons for who she sent on the field and when and her decisions are never based on colour but only on strategy to win the game and that's how it should be (not that you are suggesting otherwise).
I believe strongly that all players in all team sports should be selected on merit and that their ethnicity/colour is entirely irrelevant. The worst thing that can happen is that some sort of diversity obligations are brought into play, rather like they are in the corporate world. I know of one company which actually has a Diversity Officer to ensure that quotas of LGBTQ employees are met! I believe in meritocracy.
But in fact there are quite a few women of colour who play football at high level and furthermore some are very successful beyond - Alex Scott is the prime example.
.... Yes, Germany were far from being sporting throughout the game and weren't shy about fouling English players < Oberdorf in particular. I don't remember either who made a gracious gesture of consolation towards Oberdorf but her reaction just shows she was acting like a spoilt brat.
Although I much preferred England to win I also wanted the best team to win - Germany played strongly but didn't deserve to win.
You mentioned Nikita Parris without knowing her name but you referred to her colour. So all I was doing was informing you of her name and additionally in the context of you, not me, bringing up the subject of her colour. You were using her as an example to make your point and I was just helping you identify her.My bold,Robin, so you know what I'm responding to.
I can't quite grasp why you've written what you have which, in one breath (so to speak), you're telling me that the reason Nikita Parris came on very late was a tactical decision by Serena Wiegman and nothing to do with Nikita Parris being black and then tell me that you know I wasn't suggesting it which is correct..I just said ...."she came on in the last minutes of the game" only to remind those reading this when she came on. So I'm left wondering why you said it. No manager would leave bringing on a player in the last minute of a game because of their ethnicity.
Could you please explain to me why you said that ?
.... Was it a conscious decision on your part not to mention or name Alex Scott? Why not? She deserves so much credit for all her contribution to Women's football. As does Ian Wright, IMO.To respond to your other points. I almost mentioned Alex Scott but, obviously didn't.
.... I never said that anyone of any colour etc including white players weren't "good enough" and neither did I even infer it.You said..."I believe strongly that all players in all team sports should be selected on merit and that their ethnicity/colour is entirely irrelevant "
You'd have to believe that that was the case. In which case those black, mixed race and British Asian female players you've mentioned who, to quote you, "play at a very high level" ..can't be good enough which begs another question. Why not ?
.... I think that some people are overthinking this whole subject of 'diversity' and 'sexism' etc etc etc etc.I just thought I'd mention this aspect of the England team and should really have anticipated there would be an interest but the fact is, when looking at sport overall, it's quite a complex situation involving colour (racism if you like) class and sexism. What this win will hopefully do is to concentrate minds and bring awareness to these shortcomings and move forward and it's what those involved at senior management level..are planning on doing...ie to keep the momentum going. It really has been a game-changer. It's been suggested that the FA hand over the commercial side..ie TV rights, sponsorship etc to a specialist private organisation. I can't see that happening.
.... Judging on Oberdorf's unsporting behaviour on the pitch, her reaction to a gracious and caring gesture from a winner speaks volumes and strongly indicates her unsporting character. Compare her behaviour with German Sabine Lisicki when she lost the Wimbledon final.Re Oberdorf. Whiteflyer suggests,not unreasonably,that maybe given another 5 minutes to cool down Oberdorff's reaction to whoever it was trying to conole her would have been better. I'm not so sure but who can say ? ..only her.
You mentioned Nikita Parris without knowing her name but you referred to her colour. So all I was doing was informing you of her name and additionally in the context of you, not me, bringing up the subject of her colour. You were using her as an example to make your point and I was just helping you identify her.
.... Was it a conscious decision on your part not to mention or name Alex Scott? Why not? She deserves so much credit for all her contribution to Women's football. As does Ian Wright, IMO.
.... I never said that anyone of any colour etc including white players weren't "good enough" and neither did I even infer it.
.... I think that some people are overthinking this whole subject of 'diversity' and 'sexism' etc etc etc etc.
The benefits and momentum of this milestone win will drive forward of its own accord and what will be will be.
.... Judging on Oberdorf's unsporting behaviour on the pitch, her reaction to a gracious and caring gesture from a winner speaks volumes and strongly indicates her unsporting character. Compare her behaviour with German Sabine Lisicki when she lost the Wimbledon final.
There's a big difference between being hugely disappointed and being a bad loser. Bad losers are not welcome in any game or sport IMO.
.... Difficult and challenging hurdles are faced by any aspiring young female player regardless of their colour. Check out the back stories of many of the current Lionesses.Some extracts from articles on this issue. I noted that he vast majority of the spectators were white.
2021 article:
[snip]....[/snip]
These extracts show some of the hurdles faced by aspiring young black /mixed race/British Asian females.
What about pink people? Can they succeed?You are sounding like Lewis Hamilton. Being coloured doesn't stop someone succeeding - Apartheid doesn't exist in the UK.
Not quite sure why RedRobin has done a ‘HaHa’ on this post.What about pink people? Can they succeed?