How do you do it ?
Does a longer exposure result in a sharper picture ?
Exposure times makes no difference. In fact there is much greater probability of camera movement or subject movement introducing blur.Daftest statement I have ever read.
The exposure time makes ALL the difference to blur - try taking a pic at 1/10 sec then at 1/1000 second and try to claim there's no difference.
.
Exposure times makes no difference. In fact there is much greater probability of camera movement or subject movement introducing blur.Daftest statement I have ever read.
The exposure time makes ALL the difference to blur - try taking a pic at 1/10 sec then at 1/1000 second and try to claim there's no difference.
.
Please read again.
When hand-holding, rule of thumb is your shutter speed should not be longer duration than the effective focal length, ie 50mm lens would be minimum 1/50sec x 1.6x crop factor = 1/80sec, but YMMV depending how steady you are. IS/VR can help with this a lot, but cannot prevent subject movement blurring.
MollyB said:Can I ask what is probably a very obvious question about this calculation? I'm using a 28-80mm lens. Am I correct in thinking that I would vary the shutter speed according to where I am on the lens, so when I'm at 28mm my shutter speed would be 1/28sec x 1.6x crop factor?
And if I'm at 80mm it would be 1/80sec x 1.6 crop factor. And if I'm anywhere in between I'd adjust accordingly?
I realise that its just a rule of thumb and a good starting point, but am I understanding it correctly?
thanks
Unless you have VR/IS or what about if you want to freeze the action?
Also, focal distance has a factor too as the close something is the bigger the parallax so the more it moves.
Unfortunately there is no one answer for these types of question but I would say understanding your cameras focussing modes and depth of field are equally important to understand as shutter speed.