As donutagain I'm not very sure where the auto button is on my RB67 =D
When I'm using 35mm type cameras it's probably about 50% fully manual, 30% Aperture priority, 20% shutter priority.
For those that say they don't see any point in shooting fully manual, there's a big difference between using the in-camera meter & just going with whatever it suggests in the hope of getting what you're after. Exposure compensation can be useful, but still not as flexible as fully manual - in any automatic mode you're constantly metering and adjusting for the light (which yes, can be useful), but when you treat the in-camera meter as a seperate entity you're going "OK, I want a reading from this(these) part of the shot, I know how a reflective meter might skew what I'm after, and so I'll adjust accordingly".
I'm not trying to say there's anything wrong with using any automatic or semi-automatic metering modes, just that there can be a great deal right with going fully manual.
While we're at it, who focuses manually? Ever? I will use manual focus if the finder is large & bright enough (which generally means I'll focus manually if I'm shooting film) & if I have enough time to do as such (although in some conditions it can be considerably faster to track manually). Anyway, where I was going with that is that having 80-gazillion hyper accurate AF points is all very fine and well, but it's still not as versatile as just being able to go "I want to focus on the tip of that pencil o'er in the upper right of my image". Even if you have an AF point which covers exactly the tip of said pencil, you still have to naff about selecting it. By which point you've probably focussed manually.