Cecil The Lion...killed

Status
Not open for further replies.
I should have written "some" not "many" - my bad. Bonobos have also documented hunting behaviour. (I mean, their behaviour has been documented, not that they are documenting it. Which they might be, but it's n ot been documented. Clear?)

I've edited the post. Thanks for pointing out the embarrassing error (y)
 
Last edited:
1hf7Sgo.jpg
That is the best way to shoot endangered species. And when using a nice 35mm prime lens I'm sure the thrill will be there as well.

I like a hunt, but for endangered species it can only be a camera.
 
Post two. This thread.
That post was already presented to him as an example but he denied it was evidence of "liking human suffering". It's impossible to have an intelligent conversation with someone who refuses to accept what is placed in front of them.
 
Now, now. We've all been told about the name calling. Stick to the topic - there's plenty to criticize in his arguments without resorting to ad hominems.
 
Nah, still can't see how they meet the criterion set out by Ricardo and seeing as Ricardo didn't point that one comment out, then there is no reason to accept it. Carry on throwing names around girls.
 
I'm not allowed to have an opinion apparently because that will mean I'm a bandwagon jumper or something. It's a shame really.
 
Seriously, if I was a genuine troll I'd have started the thread myself like I said, knowing the same old shiite would spoil it.
 
Nah, still can't see how they meet the criterion set out by Ricardo and seeing as Ricardo didn't point that one comment out, then there is no reason to accept it. Carry on throwing names around girls.
Aah, so you are judging them by the standard of Ricardo's post #177, not the standard you claimed you were judging them by in your post of #179. Some kind of consistency in your argument would be welcome, otherwise you just look like a troll.

And calling anyone who actually calls you out on your own claims "girls" just because you've been made to look foolish just compounds the impression.
 
Aah, so you are judging them by the standard of Ricardo's post #177, not the standard you claimed you were judging them by in your post of #179. Some kind of consistency in your argument would be welcome, otherwise you just look like a troll.
And calling anyone who actually calls you out on your own claims "girls" just because you've been made to look foolish just compounds the impression.
Christ, you were wanting to PM last night so you could stir s*** about Ruth and because my conversations button wasn't ticked, you are turning on me? And of course, you didn't get the irony of me referring to you as girls either .............. so intelligent that you are.
 
Nah, still can't see how they meet the criterion set out by Ricardo and seeing as Ricardo didn't point that one comment out, then there is no reason to accept it. Carry on throwing names around girls.


Let's rewind. I gave you a quote. You reported me for quoting from another thread. Your amnesia kicked it.
 
Sigh. You have no idea what I was going to message you last night, so don't speculate and drag other people into it. I'm not "turning on you" - I'm arguing against the point you made on this thread. That's not the same as personal attack, and frankly if you can't tell the difference you shouldn't be posting. To further suggest that this has anything to do with not being able to PM you is just absurd.

I think it's quite clear that you are now actively trolling this thread so I won't respond to you any more.
 
Let's rewind. I gave you a quote. You reported me for quoting from another thread. Your amnesia kicked it.
You are in this thread accusing people of liking humans suffering .... no-one in this thread expressed a like of human suffering apart from ST4. Seems pretty simple to me

Awaits the "simple like you" taunts
 
You are in this thread accusing people of liking humans suffering .... no-one in this thread expressed a like of human suffering apart from ST4. Seems pretty simple to me

Awaits the "simple like you" taunts


I will try to make this simple.

I never claimed there were examples in this thread, I said IN THIS FORUM. Now I have already pointed this out to you, but you have chosen to ignore it.

I can quote you many examples that demonstrate my point.

You, by your own admission, will report me for doing so.
 
I will try to make this simple.

I never claimed there were examples in this thread, I said IN THIS FORUM. Now I have already pointed this out to you, but you have chosen to ignore it.

I can quote you many examples that demonstrate my point.

You, by your own admission, will report me for doing so.

Fair enough,

Back on topic, I recall something about a lion
 
Its like a bloody playground in here!
I'm not quite sure how many times we have to say, attack the post not the poster, before it sinks in?

I make this warning #3 ( could be more I've lost track TBH) take it as the last one eh?
 
Ahhh, the same old "if you actually read my posts" and lack of intelligence.
.
Well I got 5 minutes into re-posting it all in order - but you wouldn't read it or admit a failing because your clear lack of any open-mindedness is right there in post #179

So I'm afraid I'm no longer going to be a billy goat over your bridge:D
 
A warning has been issued for this post
.
 
Last edited:
One down 10 to go ;)
In my defence your honour - that really did take me the best part of half an hour to post and I started it before the warning. I really did start reposting it all in order before giving up. :oops: :$
 
What about me? Don't I count? I knew you never loved me! Sob! :(
I thought we were talking about billy goats, not Llama's
But if you insist, pick your own holiday duration and I'll happily oblige :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top