Car Tyres - Question

A lot of budget tyres perform badly in the wet. .

It really isn't worth the risk!
I don't know of these makes personally but I would be tempted to stay with something reputable after all there is only several square inches of rubber between you ( and your family) and the tarmac!
 
Kumho and maxxis are big brands. Although maxxis still aren't that big in the uk in terms of car tyres but 4x4 and bikes they are.

I swear by my bridgestone RE050A's so much grip even in the wet. But quite expensive and being a softer compound you get about 15,000miles out of them.
 
Ordered 2 new ones for the Focus. They are the round, black type - Kumho's I think but not sure. Should do the job on the wonderfully potholed N Wales "roads".
 
Last edited:
Kumho and maxxis are big brands. Although maxxis still aren't that big in the uk in terms of car tyres but 4x4 and bikes they are.

I swear by my bridgestone RE050A's so much grip even in the wet. But quite expensive and being a softer compound you get about 15,000miles out of them.

They taken the commuter market on well, but performance and grip wise construction is king and I go for the thorough-bread brands like Pirelli, Dunlop or any expensive construction type.

We used to ride around on what seemed to be hard nylon rubber, I can tell you, soft sticky tyres changed my life... yehaaa!
 
Premium tyres e.g. Michelin, Pirelli, Goodyear, other name brands will generally be the latest technology tyres and often OE fitment for car manufacturers. On the whole, they will be very well tested and perform well. However, all tyres are a trade off of wear, grip, dry and wet performance, performance under braking, noise etc and none will be the best at everything but all will be competent or better in all of them. They are naturally the most expensive.

These manufacturers produce second line brands e.g. Firestone (by Bridgestone), Uniroyal (by Continental) etc. These will generally be the prior level of technology handed down from the premium brand and have become cheaper to produce as the development and tolling costs are amortised. They won't be massively cheaper, but they will generally still be very good tyres.

They also produce third line brands which are another level or more of technology removed and are even cheaper. However, they will be generally competent and well made tyres, but more compromises in performance.

Anything else will generally be cheap and nasty or will be products from less tried and tested manufacturers. You very much pay your money and take your chance with these.
 
I have falken ze912's all round on my car and find them very good in all conditions. Got them from a website called camskill and had a local tyre shop fit, balance, etc.
 
Not true - Uniroyal are a Continental Group brand but should be regarded as a 'premium' brand. Not budget.

Depend on where you are in the world. Michelin in North America. Bridgestone group in Australia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tire_companies

I tried Mohawks several years back on a Mazda 323 only went with them as they are owned by Yokohama. They were cheap but a great tyre much more grip than the bridgestones they replaced in wet and dry.
 
Back
Top