tlr
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 222
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have done a lot of reading and searching on here and elsewhere and I still can't decide.
The F4 is sharp and cheap, but most of my photos will be hand held and I can't help thinking that I'll miss the IS thatI have on my 24-105. Or, if I'm spending the money for an F4 IS should I actually get the 2.8? I definitely can't justify the 2.8 IS....
Lots of F4s in the classifieds here, but not seen any F4 IS, so are the F4 users selling them because they are upgrading to IS or to 2.8?
Most of my photography is rock climbing, mountain biking and landscape, certainly no studio, and not much tripod really.
I have a 100-400 which was brilliant for safari, but I haven't used since 'cos I can't realistically hand hold it, and its pretty hefty. I'll probably try to sell or trade for whichever 70-200 I decide on.
Sorry for the slightly rambling and vague post, but any thoughts on these options gratefully received.
The F4 is sharp and cheap, but most of my photos will be hand held and I can't help thinking that I'll miss the IS thatI have on my 24-105. Or, if I'm spending the money for an F4 IS should I actually get the 2.8? I definitely can't justify the 2.8 IS....
Lots of F4s in the classifieds here, but not seen any F4 IS, so are the F4 users selling them because they are upgrading to IS or to 2.8?
Most of my photography is rock climbing, mountain biking and landscape, certainly no studio, and not much tripod really.
I have a 100-400 which was brilliant for safari, but I haven't used since 'cos I can't realistically hand hold it, and its pretty hefty. I'll probably try to sell or trade for whichever 70-200 I decide on.
Sorry for the slightly rambling and vague post, but any thoughts on these options gratefully received.
