I tested all three at the same time. There was little or nothing to choose between the Canon and Kenko (Pro DG version). The Sigma IQ was fine but it gave a different colourcast to the others.
I use the Mk-I 1.4x TC the original model) on both my 70-200mm f/4L IS and 300mm f/4L IS lenses and it does a fine job. I once borrowed a Kenko and that also did a good job but, I was not able to do a side by side test.
I purchased my Canon TC on eBay and paid just a bit more than what a new Kenko cost.
I have been meaning to do a test contrasting the 70-200mm f/4L IS with 1.4x TC against my 300mm f/4L IS without an adapter. I will also test the 300mm f/4L IS with the 1.4x TC against the 400mm f/5.6L.
I realize that the focal lengths will not be the same (280mm vs. 300mm and 430mm vs. 400mm) however this should help in my decision whether to keep the 400mm f/5.6 or to sell it and rely on the 300mm with 1.4x TC added.
Thanks for the response , I recently aquirred a 300 f/4L ( non IS ) and wondered if it would be better partnered with the Canon TC rather than the Sigma 1.4 I already have , Dont mind selling it and buying the Canon if its worthwhile .
You're probably aware but there are two versions out there...original and MkII. Optically they're the same and the only differences are improved weather sealing and a darker internal barrel coating to reduce reflections when used with lenses having larger front elements.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.