I'm not sure 300mm 2.8 and lightweight go togetherI'd love to try one, but I think my ideal lens would be a lightweight RF300mm f2.8 with a build in 1.4x convertor.
I've been using the EF300 2.8 IS II for over 10 years now, always handheld. I'm sure they could make the RF version significantly lighter (probably sub 2Kg) as they did with the 400mm f2.8 versions over the years.I'm not sure 300mm 2.8 and lightweight go together
I agree about the 1.4x though, having it built in with the ability to turn it on and off would be incredible
I can hand hold the 100-300, and I have handheld my 400mm 2.8 as well, but I just prefer to have them on a monopod as much as possibleI've been using the EF300 2.8 IS II for over 10 years now, always handheld. I'm sure they could make the RF version significantly lighter (probably sub 2Kg) as they did with the 400mm f2.8 versions over the years.
I loved the convenience of the built in 1.4x on the 200-400 when I owned it.
This isn't a 300 2.8, it's a 100-300 2.8Sony do a 300 f2.8 weighs 1.4 kilo or thereBouts i have held one light a feather
Yeah I get it, it's all subjectiveIt's hard to judge.
The bokeh looks a tad harsh in a couple of them.
Well, I say harsh, moreover, not creamy if that makes any sense?
Aside that, wow, what a lens.
You are a lucky guy.