Canon Lenses!!

I dont pat any lenses, pat dogs maybe, even pat the postman...... or is that postman pat. but never ever pat my lenses
 
garyrestall said:
I dont pat any lenses, pat dogs maybe, even pat the postman...... or is that postman pat. but never ever pat my lenses
Click to expand...

You don't?! Damn, I must be going a bit bonkers, I pat my lens and hug my camera every night :lol: :love:
 
I had a 70-300 DO several years back and loved the lens. I wanted something with good reach but as lightweight as possible as my wife was using the camera and couldn't hold heavier lenses. It was a perfect walkaround travel lens and it felt quite compact. But I soon wanted something a bit faster and to be honest a bit sharper. The DO behaved a bit differently to normal lenses and for me needed more processing to get the images to sing. Also it produced odd donut type bokeh, which drives some people bonkers but I didn't mind. The lens is actually quite unloved by many, and I was one of the few who enjoyed using it.

However for all the advantages I thought it gave me, it eventually went to fund more conventional lens purchases. That was my main gripe, it was just too expensive and I ended up with a 70-200 L F4 is plus 1.4x tele for less money than I originally paid for the DO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top