Well first off you can turn touch screen off, and dont have to fold out the screen. Same goes for WiFi and anything else you dont want to use.
That's why I said
or at the very least are the majority of people are paying for additions, that they would never use?
Im sure a lot of us only shoot raw,and by doing that we arent using a huge part of the camera anyway
Without started the old ageing war

I started off with Jpeg, then moved onto raw, as it happens cs5 can't read 7DII raw files so I reverted to Jpeg,
Jpegs can be manipulated in ACR just the same as raw.
So I see no difference TBH, if the detail is not there, at either end of the scale, then no amount of manipulation will recover it.
Thats probably more use if you are doing video though,
And I guess that is the way a lot "photography" is going these days.
and touted these features as not wanted and were just gimmicks.
Ultimately its horses for courses I guess.
I've had a couple of cameras with fold-out screens now and I find them very useful. If you don’t want fold out you just fold it back face-out and then it is just like an ordinary rear screen.
As above Chris, it seems pointless to me at least, but then again horses for courses.
7Dii is quite old and high ISO and dynamic range is generally better on newer sensors.
One would hope so certainly, as I've not tried an 80D then I can't comment, but have in the past, used older camera's with fold screens and found them to be a pita, aka a gimmick.
Although I would add, I now tend to shoot auto iso, as I trust the 7DII much more than the 7DI.
and have found surprisingly when checking the exif, what I would class as very high, no noise, iso readings.
So this Dinosaur is happy with the 7DII at least
