Canon 70-210 USM - Worth paying £160?

A lovely lens but certainly not worth paying £160 for, especially 2nd hand. £100 max.

If you are looking for a zoom that covers that range why not look at the 55-250mm which has the added benefit of IS.
 
A lovely lens but certainly not worth paying £160 for, especially 2nd hand. £100 max.

If you are looking for a zoom that covers that range why not look at the 55-250mm which has the added benefit of IS.


Because the 70-210 is better from the brief test I did with the 55-250.

Matt
 
Can you let me know what you think of it as i am also interested in buy the lens
 
Can you let me know what you think of it as i am also interested in buy the lens

if you're planning to use it with your 5d - don't bother. it's awful on FF. I was using it frequently with my 350d and 450d with great results but when I put it on my 5d mkII, it's just awful. soft and even when i close the aperture to f/8 or more, there is not much difference. on crop it will be great. I've it tried on my friend 20d and all the photos were much sharper than on my 5d.
 
The 55-250 IS is far better on a crop.
 
if you're planning to use it with your 5d - don't bother. it's awful on FF. I was using it frequently with my 350d and 450d with great results but when I put it on my 5d mkII, it's just awful. soft and even when i close the aperture to f/8 or more, there is not much difference. on crop it will be great. I've it tried on my friend 20d and all the photos were much sharper than on my 5d.

Even if its a 5D mark one?

Just bought one off ebay this second :( If it really is as bad as you say it can just go on my 30D crop sensor.
 
Back
Top