OK, anyone got an alternative??![]()
Does Canon have anything equivalent to the AF 180/2.8 nikkor? I find that a very acceptable alternative to the Nikon 70-200 VR, lots cheaper (mine is an early 90's job I got for 200-odd) has comparable image quality (some might argue purer and sharper) and so much lighter that you can take it with you on the off-chance that you may need it. I mostly use the 17-55 and a 105 VR, but it's very useful to be able to pull out the 180 if something is just a bit too far for the 105 to reach. Between the two of them I've never felt any pressing need for the big pro zoom.OK, anyone got an alternative??![]()
Depth of field depends on focus distance and focal length; a couple of examples :My findings on the sharpness of this lens after one day
DOF... is measured in mm at 2.8. I tried a hand held shot of the wifes face with focus on her eye. I loaded it in the PC and set it to actual pixels and the eye was blurred. HOWEVER, the eyelid was as sharp as a pin!
Depth of field depends on focus distance and focal length; a couple of examples :
200mm F2.8, Focus Distance : 10 metres, DOF : 26cm
200mm F2.8, Focus Distance : 5 metres, DOF : 6cm
70mm F2.8, Focus Distance : 10 metres, DOF : 212cm
70mm F2.8, Focus Distance : 5 metres, DOF : 53cm