There are at least two other factors worth considering.
1 - Better handling of noise at high ISO's
2 - Micro focus adjustment
hi Guys, just seen a 650d + kit lens for £400 is this a good price and how does it compare to 40d/50d
There are at least two other factors worth considering.
1 - Better handling of noise at high ISO's
2 - Micro focus adjustment
... whether the 50d is worth that bit extra.
There are at least two other factors worth considering.
1 - Better handling of noise at high ISO's
2 - Micro focus adjustment
40D doesn't have micro focus adjusment![]()

I've never looked into the detail but i'm sure when the 50d was released most saw it as a step backwards ISO wise.
It wasn't
I tried both, the 50D was, when viewed at the same image size, an improvement.
If the image was viewed at 100% on each camera then the 50D noise was slightly more pronounced. However this was more than negated by the 50% increase in resolution.
And the more aggressive NR - 40D has less noise than any current canon APS-C camera
Are you talking from experience of owning both cameras?
If you've been offered the two then I think I'd take the 50 over the 40 for the reasons outlined above and also because it will be worth more when you sell it on.
If you had a 40 and were thinking of upgrading to a 50 I'd say don't bother.
I did just that and tbh, it wasn't really worth the extra money for the slight benefits I gained.![]()
