Evening all, I have been offered a Canon 350D as a starter DSLR with a couple of kit lenses. Is this suitable as a first DSLR? It will only be for general photography.
The 18-55 is kit lens and is regarded as being good, the 70-300 gets very mixed review, some say its briliant, some say its good upto 200 and then gets soft, if your only using it for general use i would say go for it, then save up some money and depending on which lens you use the most buy a better lens.
Evening all, I have been offered a Canon 350D as a starter DSLR with a couple of kit lenses. Is this suitable as a first DSLR? It will only be for general photography.
I expect it'll be the Tamron 70-300, Quite slow to auto focus and a little noisy (sound not image) but I've had some good results from it. Will be fine as a basic zoom lens.
You can get very resonable results with entry level/kit lenses as you can see here.
The Red Kite was taken on a 300d with an EF 75-300mm lens and the waterfall was taken on a 450d with the standard EFS 18-55mm lens.
I used a 350D for about 5 years until I felt the need to upgrade - it is an excellent camera for a beginner and though the 75-300mm lens has a bad reputation I used one for a short while and the only problem for me was my inability to hold it steady at speeds under 1/1000 sec at the longest focal length.
If you want a very good walkabout lens to go with it I'd personally recommend the 28-135mm IS USM lens which is a great and versatile lens at a very good price.
Like any camera the 350D is only as good as the person behind it so I would learn to use it to the limits of its capabilities - it really will amaze you what you can do with it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.