Gary Kinghorn
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,505
- Edit My Images
- No
A little help please guys.
Currently I have a 5D Mk11 and a 50D. I shoot a few weddings and some portrait type stuff using pretty much solely L series lenses. As well as that I do a reasonable amount of motorsport type shots - on an amateur basis. Then add to that the normal family and holiday shots and you have what I use the camera for.
The 5d is used 90% of the time with the 50d kept as the back up, different lens for the odd shot here and there.
I have always had a hankering for a 1D, don't we all. I tried a Mk1 a while back and found it ok, but not great. That was when I bought the 5D. Now I have seen a Mk11 DS and the itch is starting again.
To buy it I would part ex the 50D in. Obviously I know the 1D is full frame as well as the 5D. The question is is the change worth paying for, or is the 50D as good a camera as the older 1D?
Currently I have a 5D Mk11 and a 50D. I shoot a few weddings and some portrait type stuff using pretty much solely L series lenses. As well as that I do a reasonable amount of motorsport type shots - on an amateur basis. Then add to that the normal family and holiday shots and you have what I use the camera for.
The 5d is used 90% of the time with the 50d kept as the back up, different lens for the odd shot here and there.
I have always had a hankering for a 1D, don't we all. I tried a Mk1 a while back and found it ok, but not great. That was when I bought the 5D. Now I have seen a Mk11 DS and the itch is starting again.
To buy it I would part ex the 50D in. Obviously I know the 1D is full frame as well as the 5D. The question is is the change worth paying for, or is the 50D as good a camera as the older 1D?