Can anything be done.......?

I'm still very much a newbie here and at photography, so not really sure if i am qualified sufficiently to comment, but as much as I love some of the alternatives I personally still prefer the OP's original slant on this.
 
c4rv3r said:
It seems very crowded if you ask me, maybe try it with a shallower depth of field?
Click to expand...

░
:shrug:


Taztastic said:
isn't that putting a religious slant on it?
Click to expand...

You take from art what you will, I see a set of angles you see religion. My art is for all and no ones heart felt opinion is wrong to me because I live for the art darling :love:
 
I

Tried a HDR one, kinda works
 
I just had a thought and had to check.....thankfully, Dave has his edit box ticked, or we'd have all been in BIG trouble....;)
 
Sorry, wrong thread... can one of the mods move this to nudes and glamour please....

bg7l3r.jpg
 
I hope when the 2010 comes to an end this is voted the best thread EVER. So much learnt in such a short time :)

My personal opinion - I reckon the OP went for a slash and that's the result.
 
I think the crop is too tight.. how about opening up a bit

~~~~~~~~____| |__~~
~~~\o/~~~\________|~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I used the Zappa-filter to fill in the blanks, works a treat.
 
nice post...I luv landscapes with fences

/ ..it is a post? right?
 
I saw an identical one yesterday but the light was fading and it suffered from terrible camera shake from the long exposure time needed, and I didn't have a tripod handy.

Here is the result.

&
 
ChrisH said:
Andy was that a forward slash or a backslash

:D
Click to expand...

A backslash is what happens when you are out on a very windy day and face the wrong way :lol:
 
This will remain the longest thread about nothing until a mod comes along and closes it :)
 
matt2martin said:
✓

Is clearly the correct way to do it.
Click to expand...


Not sure but I reckon you have over processed that one, clear signs of fringing and halo's on the edges:geek:
 
It might be better if it was on a 1/3.
 
Opened it in Photoshop and clicked something, not sure what I've done...

〃
 
scottcampbell said:
Opened it in Photoshop and clicked something, not sure what I've done...

〃
Click to expand...

Now you've gone and broken it... just click undo :thumbs:

─▀██▀─▄███▄─▀██─██▀██▀▀▀♥─
──██─███─███─██─██─██▄█───
──██─▀██▄██▀─▀█▄█▀─██▀█───
─▄██▄▄█▀▀▀─────▀──▄██▄▄▄█
THIS THREAD!
 
Still waiting for Dave to make an appearence.....:shrug: The very least he can do is thank us for all the effort we've put in to our edits.....the man hours spent in photoshop must be in the hundreds!!! :eek:
 
LMFAO

you know you come here for genuine help and this THIS is what you get not one of you mentioned rule of thirds here dammit no wonder he has yet to return!
 
Last edited:
Best thread in a long time, you're all either drunk, mad or just plain mean. Brilliant.

Anyway, I'm no expert on this type of photography but I feel it my duty to try and help the op with his dilemma. I felt that the original, although it had merit, lacked a focal point in the foreground and so the eye wandered through the image with nowhere to settle, so here's my take on it.....

/...
...\

This, I think you will agree, adds depth to the image whilst allowing the main theme to shine through.

Cheers

Andy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top