Relatively new to the world of DSLR, so advice would be welcome.
At the moment I have a Nikon 50D with a 55-200 Nikkor lens. I am considering whether to swop my D50 for the D3100.
What do you think ?.
What can't you do with, or don't like about the 'D50'?
IIRC the D50 has the LCD on the top and a internal auto-focus motor.
The D3100 has niether and whilst this might not be a problem it will take some getting use to the new menu layout. I guess you might not.be concerned about the lack of auto-focus motor. At work I went from a D70 to a D5000 and felt in some.ways it was a backwards step.
However, I suggest a S/H S80 or D90 might feel like more of an upgrade.
swiftflo said:Looking at the specs of the D3100 I believe it would have AF with my present lens (AF-S).
It would indeed, but you'd lose the ability to use older, non AFS lenses, something you might want to do at a later date... The D3100 is an entry level model therefore most settings are changed via menus instead of buttons/top LCD, the D50 is a midrange model with proper buttons and top LCD if i recall correctly. As has been suggested, the D80 or better still D90 would be more familiar to you in terms of control layout.swiftflo said:Looking at the specs of the D3100 I believe it would have AF with my present lens (AF-S).
ronnus said:I the D50 is a midrange model with proper buttons and top LCD if i recall correctly. As has been suggested, the D80 or better still D90 would be more familiar to you in terms of control layout.
)
Learn something new every day... it was years ago I had a brief go with a D50, I assumed the (sort of) current formula of proper buttons plus top LCD plus AF screw equals midrangeTCR4x4 said:The D50 at the time actually was the base model, with the D70 being the midrange and the D200 being the semi pro, but it was considerably more "midrange" in features and build than the current base models.
It was my first DSLR and was an excellent and well build camera.
ronnus said:Learn something new every day... it was years ago I had a brief go with a D50, I assumed the (sort of) current formula of proper buttons plus top LCD plus AF screw equals midrangeIt certainly felt easier to use than my D40, albeit with a tiny rear LCD... Oh, and it was silver if I remember right. Not nice!
![]()
Go on, tell us how much!? I can sense a new thread coming from this hehehTCR4x4 said:Yeah you could get silver ones as well as black which looked vile. I remember buying mine from Jessops, not quite believing how much I just spent on a camera!
ronnus said:Go on, tell us how much!? I can sense a new thread coming from this heheh![]()
I think I paid £250 and my girlfriend paid £250 as it was a birthday present.
That was with a load of "jessops extra specials" added on as well. A load of crap I never used but was told was a necessity.
Must have been 2005/2006 ish I guess, the camera had only just been released.
Have been thinking a lot about this swop now for a while. My thoughts at the moment are that I may go for the d7000. I see there are a couple on fleabay.
Anyone with an idea as to how many actuations these cameras will carry out ?.
They might last for 100,000, they might die after 3000 there's no real way of telling, just like any other consumer electronic product......
If I could get deals like that at my local branch, I'd spend more money there, but they're not interested. Last time I enquired about a D700 I was told that they hadn't seen one in a while therefore they were "probably discontinued", and asked if I'd like to look at a D300s instead. I declined politely without pointing out the obvious...whacko77uk said:Lol! I must be the only one to get good deals out of Jessops, try the New Oxford Street flagship store they have a couple of pros working there full time.
I recently paid £740 for a D7000 body only and got an additional £50 toward anything, I chose a black rapid strap. That's a deal in my books...![]()