acetone
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,327
- Edit My Images
- No
Any of these will be good for breaking your camera.
Tripod sockets are design to take take compressive load. Lugs are for attaching straps.
But not if you attach your Qstrap like I do.
Any of these will be good for breaking your camera.
Tripod sockets are design to take take compressive load. Lugs are for attaching straps.
And?
My guess is Op Tech have differentiated from BR for fear of being sued. BR have somehow managed to get a patent, even though the same basic method has been used DIY by photographers for decadesThey have put at least one US rival brand out of business and blocked others. The Chinese cloners don't care though!
Jonathan, it sounds like the problems you had were related to the BR carabiner and the lens bracket rather than the camera tripod mount. Am I reading that right?
Pretty much. Those are the bits that failed dramatically.
However, I still believe that hanging a heavy camera from a single point is flawed. It will allow it to swing more and that's bad in lots of ways. E.g. the flash socket if you use a flash and the possibility of impact or abrasion damage. That's more wear and tear failure and it's sometimes harder to point the finger of blame at the strap.
Also, if you habitually carry a heavy lens like a 70-200 on a camera over your shoulder then sooner or later you will need the bayonet on the camera replaced. They flex minutely and you don't really notice it drifting out of focus until you have it fixed. It's not particularly expensive (30 quid or so) but it's a week without a camera. My belief is that a single attachment point will make this sooner rather than later. Moment of inertia and all that.
Pretty much. Those are the bits that failed dramatically.
However, I still believe that hanging a heavy camera from a single point is flawed. It will allow it to swing more and that's bad in lots of ways. E.g. the flash socket if you use a flash and the possibility of impact or abrasion damage. That's more wear and tear failure and it's sometimes harder to point the finger of blame at the strap.
Also, if you habitually carry a heavy lens like a 70-200 on a camera over your shoulder then sooner or later you will need the bayonet on the camera replaced. They flex minutely and you don't really notice it drifting out of focus until you have it fixed. It's not particularly expensive (30 quid or so) but it's a week without a camera. My belief is that a single attachment point will make this sooner rather than later. Moment of inertia and all that.
Interesting, thanks Jonathan.
But TBH I'm not put off using a Black Rapid. I think a lot of the discomfort about attaching the camera upside-down like this is phychological (maybe not in your case) and you just have to be sensible. I'm also fairly certain that if there was a fundamental issue we would have heard all about it and BR would go swifty out of business. All the problems I've heard about all involve something coming undone/unhooked rather than breaking - mainly surrounding that M'frotto QR tripod plate.
My camera swings about far less with the BR, though it's not attached directly to the tripod bush, but to an L-bracket point closer to the hand grip. The camera nestles at a nice angle against the hip.
My 70-200 f4 attaches to a DIY metal loop bolted to the tripod collar, again positioned so the angle of the dangle is just right. I did have a scare with that though, as the (cheapo) collar was trying to unscrew itselfFixed that sharpish!
I think your right,the big thing is with me is how comforble the B/R are,the other day carrying around an D700 & 24-70mm F2.8,my shoulder felt ok,but my Billingham bag just carrying 85mm lens and a few bits & bobs was killing me.
![]()