Richard Peters
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,323
- Edit My Images
- No
Sorry to hear that, not a nice situation. This is why I would never leave my camera unattended. If it's not in my hands it's at least in touching ditance.

Bummer mate. I don't know if you know but theres been cases in the past where thieves will target expensive wedding venues, often dressed smartly or as guests, not saying thats the case here but worth keeping in mind.
I know it's a long shot but I will list the items stolen and serial numbers just in case anyone sees or hears anything:
Nikon D300
Serial 6001880
Fitted with Lowepro neoprene strap
Nikon MB-D10
Serial 2001146
Fitted with Kirk QR plate
Nikon 85mm f/1.4
Serial 422617 (the lens is fitted with the metal hood but no lens cap)
Sometimes it's just better to buy new and put it out of your mind as quickly as possible.

Thanks for all the comments, it is appreciated. I have spoken to Stewart at Lenses For Hire and the claim process is starting for the lens, as always Stewart is a gent to deal with and I cannot recommend him highly enough. The matter has been reported to Sussex Police and I am speaking to the hotel on a regular basis re CCTV and potential witnesses etc.
I know it's a long shot but I will list the items stolen and serial numbers just in case anyone sees or hears anything:
Nikon D300
Serial 6001880
Fitted with Lowepro neoprene strap
Nikon MB-D10
Serial 2001146
Fitted with Kirk QR plate
Nikon 85mm f/1.4
Serial 422617 (the lens is fitted with the metal hood but no lens cap)
Sandisk Extreme III 8gb card
Contains 150-200 wedding images in RAW
The last item on the list is the real thing that makes your stomach churn. I hope there was nothing important on the card
On the bright side though, which isn't easy, that D300 can get an upgrade now to a 700![]()

kelack is onto a good idea here. I think if you can get the local press involved with the slant on local photographer loses equipment but also Brides day ruined by camera thieves stealing photos of the big day.