No age was mentioned. Talk about jumping to conclusionsWas it a young assistant? I see jumping to conclusions already from someoneMaybe it was an old assistant, who really does have trouble with basic calculations. Either way, you should write to the company involved, expressing concern instead of mocking
![]()
lol yes they were under the counter plasters!We're you buying under the counter plasters? Wondering why they weren't going through the till, which would have calculated the total and provided the required record of the transaction.
I didn't realise there was such demand for medical supplies in the black economy...
Should they really be working in a shop at the tills? I would have thought there are plenty better suited jobs in that case.Some people struggle with numbers.
Dyscalculia - the numerical version of dyslexia.
Such as?Should they really be working in a shop at the tills? I would have thought there are plenty better suited jobs in that case.
Beat me to it, I was about to post, 13 posts and I'm still waiting for the answerIs it only me?
So how much is it?![]()
1 pound and 16 shillings.Beat me to it, I was about to post, 13 posts and I'm still waiting for the answer![]()
Ah Gotta ya, that makes more sense1 pound and 16 shillings.
Street sweeper to name one. I mean seriously?Such as?
There aren't many jobs that don't depend on numbers. There's certainly no business that doesn't need a degree of numeracy or a coping strategy (e.g.a calculator).
They need to be able to work out his / her wages to make sure they have not been ripped offStreet sweeper to name one. I mean seriously?
They need to be able to work out his / her wages to make sure they have not been ripped off![]()
They have to calculate the average number of brush strokes per mile you know.Street sweeper to name one. I mean seriously?
They have to calculate the average number of brush strokes per mile you know.
Should they really be working in a shop at the tills?
What do a driving school have to do with the price of chips?have a below average BSM
Because from the OP it is rather clear they aren't suited to the jobWhy not?
Because from the OP it is rather clear they aren't suited to the jobIf I had a shop I wouldn't entertain that.
If they need a calculator for that sum, then I have no faith that they would notice it if they hit the wrong key and get the wrong answer.Why aren't they suited to the job? The tools provided (till & calculator) enable them to do the job so if, as Neil suggests, they have genuine difficulties with numbers but they have those tools, then denying them the opportunity is surely discrimination.
If they need a calculator for that sum, then I have no faith that they would notice it if they hit the wrong key and get the wrong answer.
Absolutely, and proven many a time that people using a calculator with no ability to mentally verify whether the answer is correct, then hell yes they are in the wrong job. No discrimination involved at all. In fact I would have given them that test during the interview, just like I do with developers, technical architects, project managers.Really? So, if they have a problem with mental arithmetic, you assume that they're too incompetent to operate a calculator? Discrimination based on assumption then.
Absolutely, and proven many a time that people using a calculator with no ability to mentally verify whether the answer is correct, then hell yes they are in the wrong job. No discrimination involved at all. In fact I would have given them that test during the interview, just like I do with developers, technical architects, project managers.
No, that's not what he's saying at all.As I said, there's an assumption that difficulty with mental arithmetic implies that they are not competent enough to use a calculator.
No, that's not what he's saying at all.
The issue is that it's always easy, for any of us, to make mistakes using a calculator. Key sticks a bit, key registers twice, accidentally hit the wrong key, accidentally press two keys at the same time, that sort of thing. So how do you know whether you might have made a mistake? Most of the time, because the answer feels wrong. For example I just quickly tried to calculate 123 x 456 on my phone, and I got 557,688, and that just feels wrong. It's got too many digits.
So the assumption is that, if you need a calculator to work out 10 x 18, you very likely don't have enough of a feel for numbers to spot when you might have made a mistake. I think that's a very reasonable assumption.
Thank you, absolutely 100% how I meant my comments.No, that's not what he's saying at all.
The issue is that it's always easy, for any of us, to make mistakes using a calculator. Key sticks a bit, key registers twice, accidentally hit the wrong key, accidentally press two keys at the same time, that sort of thing. So how do you know whether you might have made a mistake? Most of the time, because the answer feels wrong. For example I just quickly tried to calculate 123 x 456 on my phone, and I got 557,688, and that just feels wrong. It's got too many digits.
So the assumption is that, if you need a calculator to work out 10 x 18, you very likely don't have enough of a feel for numbers to spot when you might have made a mistake. I think that's a very reasonable assumption.
Thank you, absolutely 100% how I meant my comments.
I really didn't think it had to be that hard to understand or be so argumentative.
Oh come on, again taken a bit of a dramatic extrapolation to what I said. But hey if you are happy to employ people who take money for you who can't calculate be my guest, I'll employ those who can.So disagreeing with you is argumentative? ok then.