Budget lens for cars

For doing what sort of shots? "Cars" doesn't really give an indication of what sort of setting you'll be shooting them in, or how much you want to spend....
 
What sort of shots?

The 18-55mm at F8 would do cars in built up areas just fine unless you had a specific type of shot on mind.
 
Secondhand Sigma 10-20mm? Probably slightly over your budget, but you might find one if you hunt.....
 
Why is the kit lens not "fit for purpose"? The only downside I can see is that the front element rotates, which would make using a CPL filter a bit tricky.

When the kit lens is stopped down a bit it is actually pretty sharp. Are you using a tripod for your shots?
 
In that case you will need something wider, such as the 10-20 Sigma, but expect distortion at the edge of the frame if you're going much wider than the kit lens.
 
I'll second the vote for a Sigma 10-20mm ( although I shoot with Sony Camera's)

I use one its a cracking lens

Les :thumbs:
 
I can predict that the answer is walk back a bit.

I mainly use my 50mm (on full frame, so equivalent of 80mm on your camera) as I find that a good length for car shots.
 
If you want to buy an over rated bag filler, then yes...............:)

Hahaha :plusone:

I'd go with the Sigma 10-20.... good lens, should give you some of the whacky style much loved by the chav^H^H^H^H car magazines.
 
I might give up on that then as I what the image as sharp as possible.

Just to point out, he didn't say it wouldn't be sharp (although that is another argument), he said there would be distortion at the edge of the frame. That is a different matter, and something any ultra wide angle lens is going to give. Talking extremes, look at a fish eye lens, its highly distorted, but the image will be sharp.

Quite simply, use what you have got, and stand further back - you'll get the same field of view as standing closer with a wide angle lens, but without the distortion.
 
Back
Top