I've no particular brief for Poah , indeed he and I don't see eye to eye on numerous subjects and I once got a serious telling off for calling him a troll - but, I have to be honest I haven't seen him say that here at all - indeed he seems to have been saying something quite different
On this subject I pretty much agree with poah - breast feeding babies is normal and healthy - breast feeding toddlers is not (unless you live in a poverty stricken society where breast milk is the only suitable food available) , Breast feeding livestock (especially in tandem with children) is distinctly not.
You quoted him saying "a new born's immune system is not fully developed and the mothers antibodies disappear after about 2 weeks" That's misinformation. Googling "Antibodies in breastmilk after 6 months" brings over 300,000 results. At around 6 months, the maternal antibodies from the placenta deminish but antibodies, stem cells etc etc remain in breast milk.
IMO breastfeeding in public largely comes down to one issue: sexualisation of the breast. It is somehow acceptable for a woman to be on the front of a lads mag completely topless so long as her nipples are covered, even if it's just duct tape.
As long as breasts continue to be sexualised, there will be the stigma of breastfeeding. No one has issues when a child is bottlefed, so the act of feeding a child is fine.
As for age, IMO, when a child has weaned on to solids, there is no reason to continue breastfeeding. I've known of two adults who were (not exclusively) breastfed until around 6-7 years of age. I'd have thought that once a child starts teething, it would be uncomfortable for the mother to breast feed when there's teeth in the way but no idea how true this is.
The tongue tends to protect the nipple - when a child latches on, their tongue wraps around the nipple. Teething can be uncomfortable as the baby is getting used to the new shape of their mouth, but I admit, I've never heard of women getting bitten a lot - a few tines accidentally, but never more than. I agree, I think sexualisation in our culture is a massive part of acceptance.
I literally don't understand what you mean. As far as I am concerned, breastfeeding is perfectly normal and natural, and I am all in favour of people being confronted with it visually, and accepting that it can happen in public, and that's entirely fine.
It disturbs me greatly that mothers at our studio will ask if it is ok to breastfeed, because they shouldn't feel they have to ask.
How an image of a woman breastfeeding a different animal is going to in any way help is quite a long way beyond me. It would surely only offend, and from there make people question the nature of an exhibition and actually turn people off the entire subject?
As (I hope after this long, guys) you know, I'm pants with words, so please bear with me. Hopefully I'll be able to explain better than I have.
It's commonly accepted that many humans drink milk from cows and goats, throughout their lives in our culture. The milk that they're drinking is designed by nature for the offspring of the animal in question - ie cow for a calf. The reactions that seem most common about breastfeeding, is that it's fine to feed a tiny baby, but they should switch to milk intended for another mammal at some point. What I sincerely don't understand, is why. I don't understand the opinion of switching to another mammals milk. Human milk is designed for humans. Cows milk is designed for cows. Goats milk is designed for goats. Etc. I don't understand the desire to switch over to another milk, especially when everything that a child needs is in the human milk and a humans needs differ to that of a calf, - cows milk has everything in that a calf needs.
The reason that I considered posting the image is that people are so used to seeing others drink cows/goats milk, it's become normal. If the coin is flipped and another mammal is drinking human milk, people (see Marcels reaction, it's a perfect example!

) they recoil in disgust/fear etc. It's not seen. It's not spoken about. It's taboo! While looking at more controversial images in a similar vain, I stumbled across a womans mag article, with an image of a woman breastfeeding her pug and the headline "I bottle fed my children but I breastfeed my pug" or words to that effect. It's taboo. It's not commonplace. It's not "normal". (I hate that word!) People cringe at the concept of breast milk ice cream or breast milk yoghurt.
Which then brings me onto normalising "extended breastfeeding" - ie, breastfeeding beyond 2 years (
http://voices.yahoo.com/happy-healthy-baby-benefits-extended-breastfeeding-259621.html ), although I'm using the term very loosely and meaning anything beyond 6 months to be honest! People don't see it, formula was the norm locally for many generations and still is. Breastfeeding young babies is more accepted now, but in the 80's people were more taken aback if they knew a woman was breastfeeding their baby, in this area. In fact, I've had people express their displeasure before she was even born! :thumbsdown: As more women have breastfed locally, a few feeds, a few weeks, a few months, a year even, it's become more socially accepted. People will discuss it, some may see it (not meaning nursing in public - think visiting family or friends, especially near bedtime for older nursing children) people become aware that it actually happens. This then makes it less taboo over extended periods of time. 200 years ago, it would've been an alien concept to see a woman pushing her toddler down the street in a push chair, while the child was "having a bottle".