Boston Explosions

brad131987 said:
They could have just waited for him to give up
Yeah I know its hard but now they have made him incapable of talking
So they might as well of killed him
Click to expand...

We'll send you in next time Brad, clearly you know better than Boston PD's SWAT units!

Apparently he's talking now, albeit via pen and paper, so they did a pretty good job. Put one in the ground, and saved one for questioning.
 
Last edited:
Triple post...
 
..
 
odd jim said:
We'll send you in next time Brad, clearly you know better than Boston PD's SWAT units!

Apparently he's talking now, albeit via pen and paper, so they did a pretty good job. Put one in the ground, and saved one for questioning.
Click to expand...


Yes I do :-)


Who said it was them two any way
They moaned at people doing there own detective work (some were quiet convincing)
But now they caught someone they have someone to blame and make people belive they caught the right people
Just for the next man to step up and blow something else up
Like a never ending cycle
 
brad131987 said:
Yes I do :-)

Who said it was them two any way
They moaned at people doing there own detective work (some were quiet convincing)
But now they caught someone they have someone to blame and make people belive they caught the right people
Just for the next man to step up and blow something else up
Like a never ending cycle
Click to expand...

Lets just leave them to it then eh??

Of course innocent people prove their innocence by having raging gun battles with police don't they?!

Jeez, the conspiracy theorists are coming g out in droves...
 
Last edited:
brad131987 said:
Yes I do :-)


Who said it was them two any way
They moaned at people doing there own detective work (some were quiet convincing)
But now they caught someone they have someone to blame and make people belive they caught the right people
Just for the next man to step up and blow something else up
Like a never ending cycle
Click to expand...

Who do you think dunnit, Brad?
 
Last edited:
odd jim said:
Lets just leave them to it then eh??

Of course innocent people prove their innocence by having raging gun battles with police don't they?!

Jeez, the conspiracy theorists are coming g out in droves...
Click to expand...

:thumbs:
Obviously in the UK, our idea of fun is to have a BBQ or go down the pub, but over in Boston, the young lads arm themselves with assault rifles and bombs and go out to start a small war - boys will be boys;)
 
odd jim said:
Of course innocent people prove their innocence by having raging gun battles with police don't they?!

Jeez, the conspiracy theorists are coming g out in droves...
Click to expand...

I think you'll find that in conspiracyweirdoworld the gun battles didnt actually happen (one website has the bombings not happening either) but were entirely staged by 'the world government' for sinister puposes - naturally all the eye witnesses are actually also stooges for the world government/CIA etc

someone should explain occams razor to these nutters
 
big soft moose said:
I think you'll find that in conspiracyweirdoworld the gun battles didnt actually happen (one website has the bombings not happening either) but were entirely staged by 'the world government' for sinister puposes - naturally all the eye witnesses are actually also stooges for the world government/CIA etc

someone should explain occams razor to these nutters
Click to expand...

Unfortunately Pete, there are quite a few "misguided" people who believe that none of this was for real, and that actors were used instead of real victims:cuckoo:
 
andy700 said:
Unfortunately Pete, there are quite a few "misguided" people who believe that none of this was for real, and that actors were used instead of real victims:cuckoo:
Click to expand...

yeah these are the same halfwits who reckon the holocaust didnt happen , that the moon landings were fake, and the CIA blew up the twin towers :shrug:
 
big soft moose said:
I think you'll find that in conspiracyweirdoworld the gun battles didnt actually happen (one website has the bombings not happening either) but were entirely staged by 'the world government' for sinister puposes - naturally all the eye witnesses are actually also stooges for the world government/CIA etc

someone should explain occams razor to these nutters
Click to expand...

After the London bombings I read something so mind numbingly stupid, I thought I was a joke.. Sadly it wasnt.

The nut jobs were convinced the bus had its roof cut off, off site and then craned in to Russell square during the night, where they set about creating the effect of an explosion. All the people involved were in on it, no-one actually died, all the people "missing" we're sent away to an island to live out their lives in luxury.

I kid you not, these people actually thought this was perfectly viable. They even went to the trouble of pointing out the "tell tale" signs in the photos... Apparently one of the "dead corpses" in one grim picture was an actor that was also in the twin towers photos.. They "proved" he was an actor, because underneath his blooded shirt, was a clean white t shirt, and they reckoned in a real explosion, that wouldn't happen.

Using other photos, they pointed out that the bus moved during the duration the pictures were taken, as in one photo it appeared to be outside the medical building, and on another angle picture it was further down the street..


I don't even know where to begin on it... I guess they have never been to London.. Because there are very few places you could crane a bus into without someone noticing.
I guess they have never heard of perspective in pictures, and I guess they all are explosive experts who know how a human body behaves in an explosion.

Maybe we can test their theories on them to find out.
 
TCR4x4 said:
After the London bombings I read something so mind numbingly stupid, I thought I was a joke.. Sadly it wasnt.

The nut jobs were convinced the bus had its roof cut off, off site and then craned in to Russell square during the night, where they set about creating the effect of an explosion. All the people involved were in on it, no-one actually died, all the people "missing" we're sent away to an island to live out their lives in luxury.

I kid you not, these people actually thought this was perfectly viable. They even went to the trouble of pointing out the "tell tale" signs in the photos... Apparently one of the "dead corpses" in one grim picture was an actor that was also in the twin towers photos.. They "proved" he was an actor, because underneath his blooded shirt, was a clean white t shirt, and they reckoned in a real explosion, that wouldn't happen.

Using other photos, they pointed out that the bus moved during the duration the pictures were taken, as in one photo it appeared to be outside the medical building, and on another angle picture it was further down the street..

I don't even know where to begin on it... I guess they have never been to London.. Because there are very few places you could crane a bus into without someone noticing.
I guess they have never heard of perspective in pictures, and I guess they all are explosive experts who know how a human body behaves in an explosion.

Maybe we can test their theories on them to find out.
Click to expand...

It's exactly this I absolutely detest about conspiracy "theorists" (nutters). It's damn right disrespectful to the victims, let alone the people who work tirelessly to bring the offenders to justice.
 
The David Icke forums are good for a conspiracy and the Flat Earth Society think NASA are trying to fool us all for some reason.
 
Laudrup said:
The David Icke forums are good for a conspiracy and the Flat Earth Society think NASA are trying to fool us all for some reason.
Click to expand...

I thought the Flat Earth Society web page was just a leg pulling exercise?

Now if only David Icke was doing the same thing. Have vague memories of him on Wogan, was a sad site.
 
I don't think many of the higher profile conspiracy theorists actually believe the stuff they spout. It's just a way of attracting publicity and visitors to their websites & youtube videos. The more outrageous they are, the more people they attract (outraged people and nutters alike) and traffic = money.
 
Last edited:
I see that two car bombs have killed more than 40 people and injured 100 others today in the Turkish town of Reyhanli. Certainly won't get as much press coverage as what happened in Boston. Why is that?
 
that is a very good question, however ponder this.
I spent 3 yes in Northern Ireland, Londonderry to be precise. We were attacked quite regularl by various groups who opposed us being there, when phoning home to ask if it was on the news, we were told they knew nothing of it.
Who decides what is worth reporting?
 
Ricardodaforce said:
I see that two car bombs have killed more than 40 people and injured 100 others today in the Turkish town of Reyhanli. Certainly won't get as much press coverage as what happened in Boston. Why is that?
Click to expand...

I'm sure the turkish media are all over this like flys on ****, but none of the major international networks are based in turkey - London 7/7 didnt get the same ammount of coverage outside of the UK as the various american attacks either

Like it or not America is one of the two or three major players on the world power stage - so stuff that happens there gets more coverage than stuff happening elswhere.
 
Last edited:
Gr8Shot said:
that is a very good question, however ponder this.
I spent 3 yes in Northern Ireland, Londonderry to be precise. We were attacked quite regularl by various groups who opposed us being there, when phoning home to ask if it was on the news, we were told they knew nothing of it.
Who decides what is worth reporting?
Click to expand...

It's the top story on Al Jazeera.
 
Top story on BBC news too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top