Binoculars ...

chewyuk

Suspended / Banned
Messages
5,025
Name
Neil
Edit My Images
Yes
I haven't the faintest idea about these, so need some expert advice please.
Was going to put this is out of focus, but hopefully I will be allowed to leave it in here.

Looking at spending about 80 quid, with a zoom function, as for distance, well not really sure, but a good eyefull :lol:

Suggestions anyone?

Cheers,
Neil
 
Same suggestion as for cameras - try them on! What feels balanced in my paws might not in yours.

A couple of tips - if you're going to use them at dusk and dawn, try to keep the ratio between the magnification and the objective size to about 1:5 or more, ie 10 x 50 or 8 x 40, this should keep them reasonably light. Make sure they can be re-collimated if they get shifted out of allignment. It's often easy to do but may need the covering to be removed to access the adjustment screws.
 
Cheers Nod - I have seen some pricey items, would £80 be restritive ?
Yes Neil, it would...!

For bins, it's the same as cameras... you pays you rmoney and you takes your choice...:)

Paying a little more for decent glass most certainly does yield better viewing.

What are you wanting them for Neil...?
 
Hi,

First up, good quality binos are worth buying as the optics can help a great deal and not cause eye strain/fatigue which can in turn cause head aches and long term eye damage. Nitrogen filled glass will allow you to use them in humidity without the glass clouding over and make excellent travel glasses.

Anyway, to start, to measure binos, you divide the length by the aperture which gives you your brightness factor. As such, a set of 8 x 40 = 5. As a standard thats a nice bright, good length set of bino's. Naturally, 10 x offer a slightly futher view at the cost of light so you would have a brightness factor of 4. Like a camera lens, bino's rely on light transmitting down the barrel.

Also, 10,12 and above are prone to movement, even if you have the steadiest hand in the world and in low light you will feel like you have one too many cokes. That said, the length is super to use. Anything above 10 could be tripod mounted or consider Canon IS glasses which are battery driven and use and electronic giro system to counter shake. There are two types, porro and roof prism of which roof are now pretty much the norm, leading to smaller, well performing, cost effective tools.

It is suggested that 8.5 x 32 are the ideal bino's to use as this perfectly matches the exit pupil of the human eye and is also has a very wide field of view as well as long.

I hope this helps - as mentioned earlier, Nikon Monarchs are excellent 'budget' glasses and well worth a look. Most binos work wonderfully on a nice summers day, but the acid test is low light costal work where they really come into their own.

One last thing, totally avoid some of the stuff you see in the back of the Sunday papers and on market stalls, especially the stuff with red coatings.
 
Thanks for the expert advice all. That is one serious explantion Pete, looks like I need to complete some research of my own, rather than a ''general'' question.

The why is actually quite exciting, my folks are buying a Kayak and are keen to get out where they live in Pembrokeshire and do some coastal exploring. They are keen on bird spotting etc, so this is my task, otherwise, I don't get to play in it :)
 
I have a pair of Bresser 10x50's (made be Meade) and a pair of Celestron 15x70's. The 10x50 are quite lightweight and work well, with nice clear views, and for the money are excellent. The 15x70's are enormous and damned heavy. They can be handheld for short stints, but really need supporting in some way.

There are also 2 types of binos readily available. Roof Prism, tend to be smaller, lighter, easier to hold, but tend to have smaller apertures, and appear like you look straight down the barrel. Porro prism are the typical seperated eyepiece from objective looking system.

this is the pair of 10x50's I have, and they get regular astronomical use.

The other place to take a look at is [url=http://www.firstlightoptics.com/products.php?cat=49]here
, Celestron are selling some of their older models at discounted prices.
 
I have a pair of Bresser 10x50's (made be Meade) and a pair of Celestron 15x70's. The 10x50 are quite lightweight and work well, with nice clear views, and for the money are excellent. The 15x70's are enormous and damned heavy. They can be handheld for short stints, but really need supporting in some way.

There are also 2 types of binos readily available. Roof Prism, tend to be smaller, lighter, easier to hold, but tend to have smaller apertures, and appear like you look straight down the barrel. Porro prism are the typical seperated eyepiece from objective looking system.

this is the pair of 10x50's I have, and they get regular astronomical use.

The other place to take a look at is [url=http://www.firstlightoptics.com/products.php?cat=49]here
, Celestron are selling some of their older models at discounted prices.

^^^^^^^
This is the man to listen to!!!!

I've also got a pair of the Bresser 10X50's and they are PUKKA!!!!!!
Cost me £20, and worth double that.
Crystal clear view. I was gobsmacked at just how clear the view is.
 
I got some new Bushnell 8 X 40s on ebay last year for about 33 pounds...usual retail price for the model was over 100 pounds. I think that the model is the `Powerview`, but I can`t be sure. Plenty of deals around if you have a look. I think that 8 X 40 is a good ratio in terms of brightness and magnification. I`m more than happy with the quality too.
 
Back
Top