Cluster
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 770
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
My last film to be developed had a few unexpected "features".
Aside from the faults that I introduced in my home processing (dust & water marks), I noticed that those shots that were made using a red or yellow filter tended to be underexposed, even using an auto exposure matrix metering system.
Those taken via a red filter are a little more underexposed than those via the yellow filter which are around 1 stop under. The shots that show this up well are those that have a large part of the frame covering a blue sky.
I recall reading some time ago that the auto exposure systems on most film cameras don't cope well with filters...
The camera I used for these shots is a Pentax MZ-5 set to matrix metering. It seems to work well on other scenes that are non-filtered.
Should I give a little more exposure than auto when using filters?
Aside from the faults that I introduced in my home processing (dust & water marks), I noticed that those shots that were made using a red or yellow filter tended to be underexposed, even using an auto exposure matrix metering system.
Those taken via a red filter are a little more underexposed than those via the yellow filter which are around 1 stop under. The shots that show this up well are those that have a large part of the frame covering a blue sky.
I recall reading some time ago that the auto exposure systems on most film cameras don't cope well with filters...
The camera I used for these shots is a Pentax MZ-5 set to matrix metering. It seems to work well on other scenes that are non-filtered.
Should I give a little more exposure than auto when using filters?
Last edited: