I have been wondering which traditional artists are considered most important to photography?
I have been looking at some of Vermeer's work and it appears to me that there is lots we can take from his attitude to painting and apply to our photography today, I like his negative space and approach to the depth of his paintings.
Vermeer is meant to have used a camera obscura for his painting, so he was possibly using a "camera" before photographers were.
The result of this practice is that his, and others from that style of painting, have a "photographic" perspective which, as photographers, we can identify with.
I don't think there is definitive documentation on this, but there is lot of information around on the use of camera obscuras for painting.
You could start with this:
An illustrated study of Vermeer and the camera obscura.
www.essentialvermeer.com
David Hockney’s
Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters (2001) looks a really useful read on this. I haven't read it, but I watched the TV series it's based on.
Hockney's and Gayford's
A history of pictures is a great read (I've read it twice) where he discusses the entire spectrum of picture-making, including photography and the use of camera obscuras.
What is equally interesting is the influence of photography on Impressionist painters. It's worth googling. There are many books and studies on this, but I can't easily suggest one at the moment.
I can't have an answer to your question actual question, but...
I find "Vermeer" type paintings to be very skilled, but not very inspirational. I'm not saying there aren't lessons we can learn from these paintings, but I am far more "visually" inspired by Impressionist and Japanese ink paintings such as Sumi-e
https://japanobjects.com/features/sumie .