Are you as brave as this guy?

Cocksure type obviously........................
 
Some years ago a guy in the Huddersfield area was convicted of having sex with a goat after being observed by passengers on a passing train.
 
I've had a few right old dogs in my time.
 
Man nails dog, and brave is the word chosen to describe him? Really?
 
It's being put on the sex offenders list for 7 years that's just about as daft!
 
The list is meant to protect people though rather than Staffys.
 
neil_g said:
why? isnt sex with an animal classed as a sex crime..?
Click to expand...

animals can't consent , so you've got someone who's pretty much used to gaining sexual gratification by force... why wouldn't you put him on the sex offenders register... would you really want someone with that record being able to work with kids or vulnerable people
 
Mikesphotaes said:
The list is meant to protect people though rather than Staffys.
Click to expand...

Incorrect. It's supposed to list people who have committed sexual offences. The clue's in the name.
You don't consider beastiality a sexual offence?
 
big soft moose said:
animals can't consent , so you've got someone who's pretty much used to gaining sexual gratification by force... why wouldn't you put him on the sex offenders register... would you really want someone with that record being able to work with kids or vulnerable people
Click to expand...


...or as a dog walker! :D
 
Indeed

A friend of mine who's a casualty nurse told me about a bloke who came into A&E with a dead cat... shall we say attached... to his person

it seems that he had penetrated said animal by way of gaining sexual gratification, and cats not being designed to accept the sexual attentions of an adult male human had promptly died, and gone into spasm leaving him unable to detatch it from his equipment ... so he came in to A&E and asked them to perform a catectomy :puke:
 
I reckon a cockectomy would have been more appropriate! :D
 
big soft moose said:
animals can't consent , so you've got someone who's pretty much used to gaining sexual gratification by force... ......
Click to expand...

You must have more information about this than I read, if not you have a few assumptions going on there.
 
Tigger.ufo said:
I reckon a cockectomy would have been more appropriate! :D
Click to expand...

Gets my vote

although that reminds me of another A&E story about a bloke who tried to stimulate himself with a power sander and gave himself an impromtu circumcision ... there are some odd people out there
 
Last edited:
Mikesphotaes said:
You must have more information about this than I read, if not you have a few assumptions going on there.
Click to expand...

Really - you think a staffy can give consent ?

What are you saying he's innocent " because the bitch was asking for it " :lol:
 
viv1969 said:
Incorrect. It's supposed to list people who have committed sexual offences. The clue's in the name.
You don't consider beastiality a sexual offence?
Click to expand...

....and the reason behind the list existing is to?

As to beastiality, of course it is.
 
Mikesphotaes said:
....and the reason behind the list existing is to?
.
Click to expand...

keep a record of people convicted of sexual offence and prevent them being employed in positions where they have access to children and vulnerable people

Like i said earlier are you really saying you'd be happy leaving your kids in the care of someone who gets his jollies by raping dogs ?
 
big soft moose said:
Really - you think a staffy can give consent ?

What are you saying he's innocent " because the bitch was asking for it " :LOL:
Click to expand...

:D

It was more the pretty much used to sex by force bit, I was referring to.
 
big soft moose said:
keep a record of people convicted of sexual offence and prevent them being employed in positions where they have access to children and vulnerable people

Like i said earlier are you really saying you'd be happy leaving your kids in the care of someone who gets his jollies by raping dogs ?
Click to expand...

Agreed, to protect people not dogs.

However, I do take your second point.
 
big soft moose said:
Gets my vote

although that reminds me of another A&E story about a bloke who tried to stimulate himself with a power sander and gave himself an impromtu circumcision ... there are some odd people out there
Click to expand...

It's always "a friend" "someone else"... Sure this isn't personal experience lol.
 
big soft moose said:
keep a record of people convicted of sexual offence and prevent them being employed in positions where they have access to children and vulnerable people

Like i said earlier are you really saying you'd be happy leaving your kids in the care of someone who gets his jollies by raping dogs ?
Click to expand...

Most definitely I would. At least the kids would be safe!!
 
Why the hell would anyone do this? Taking aside the "stress" to the dog how must his gf (I'm assuming ex-girlfriend now) feel?

It's bad enough when your other half has it away with another person but for someone to <private time> an animal ........... I just can't comprehend it.
 
Do what? f*** a dog or film himself doing it? (Not that either is acceptable!) (Apologies to mod team for the norty word - I'm pretty sure the sweary filter will catch it!)
 
cambsno said:
Most definitely I would. At least the kids would be safe!!
Click to expand...

really - you don't think that someone who gets off on forcing himself on things smaller than himself , or for that matter on sticking his tool anywhere that's warm and wet might think "oh well I've had a dog, I wonder what a child is like" - personally I wouldn't let the perverted scrote anywhere near anyone or thing he might decide to tinker with next
 
big soft moose said:
really - you don't think that someone who gets off on forcing himself on things smaller than himself , or for that matter on sticking his tool anywhere that's warm and wet might think "oh well I've had a dog, I wonder what a child is like" - personally I wouldn't let the perverted scrote anywhere near anyone or thing he might decide to tinker with next
Click to expand...

It was tongue in cheek!
 
Really.....I fail to see anything remotely tongue in cheek about it. Perhaps that's just me.
 
I thought you were are all liberal enough to accept this fellows desire to hump a hound or two......my o my we have found the level at which you can get your stones out then.
 
cambsno said:
It's always "a friend" "someone else"... Sure this isn't personal experience lol.
Click to expand...

yeah I'm sure I'm not a nurse called Theresa who works in A&E
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top