APS film.

medwaygreen

Suspended / Banned
Messages
4,425
Name
Richard
Edit My Images
No
Can anyone point me in the right direction to buy some APS film, I would prefer 40 exposure, but 25 is OK, Date not that important, but a good price is.

Your help would be much appreciated, e-bay is not an option at the moment as I have a handle on that, but all my film suppliers have nothing at this moment in time.

Many thanks to you.

Richard.

PS, Sorry in the wrong place, I have asked a Mod to do the business for me. It was instant thank you.
 
Last edited:
Not sure how much luck you will have outside of eBay. 7 day shop did have some but they don't any more. My dad finally stopped using his APS camera recently as there is just no film about. Boots used to stock bags of it (5 rolls per bag if I remember rightly) but they don't seem to do that any more. Sorry!
 
Although they don't show up on the website, the last time I looked for APS film Boots seemed to be cheapest, they often do 5 packs at a pretty reasonable price or 3 for 2 deals.
 
Our Sainsbury's quite often has the Fuji Nexia stuff in - not sure what size though. It's my usual source for Kodak Gold 200 which I rather like in my various Olympus cameras.
 
Thanks for the help, I will check those out.
 
AGFA do APS film but I have yet to see anywhere actually selling it. Apart from AGFA Precisia 100 , the only place that I have seen selling any AGFA colour film is AG Photographic, so you could try emailing them to see if they can get hold of some for you.

Unfortunately Kodak announced a few months ago that their going to discontinue their APS film production, so it could end up like 110 is at the moment if Fuji stop as well: frozen stock of various ages and descriptions.

EDIT:

Checking on AGFA Photos site, APS film seems to no longer be listed which must be quite a recent change as I looked a couple of months ago and it was there. I've also heard in some sources that Fuji have discontinued it as well and shops are no longer being able to get new stocks of it.

I am sorry to say but it appears APS's sunset is in sight.....
 
Last edited:
I have bought some recently from ebay - batch of 40 films, all outdated by 5 years. Have used 3 rolls and they have come out perfectly. West End Cameras, sell on ebay, generally about 2-3 films. Have used those, and again outdated, but have come out perfectly.
 
I've also heard in some sources that Fuji have discontinued it as well and shops are no longer being able to get new stocks of it.

Yep, announced on 6th July.

http://fujifilm.jp/information/articlead_0120.html

[google translation from Japanese]

Fuji said:
Termination of APS film sales

July 06, 2011

FUJIFILM Corporation

FUJIFILM Corporation (President: Shigetaka Komori) is an APS film will be discontinued as soon as our inventory is gone.

Fujifilm is a company we have been struggling ever since to continue to provide the APS film substantial decrease in sales volume each year, and some raw materials are produced and finished in hard to find suppliers which is a situation which can not produce more. For this reason, we will terminate as follows: forced sale.

Sales of APS film, but this will end, Fujifilm will continue to build a system serving the photographic film while continuously reviewing and streamlining product lines produced in the future.

Fujifilm's continued support in future products, look forward to your patronage, thank you.


1. Discontinued Product Name

"Fujicolor nexia (Nekushia) 400"

  • IX240 NEXIA 400-S 25EX 1
  • IX240 NEXIA 400-S 25EX 1CD-C
  • IX240 NEXIA 400-S 25EX 3SB

2. Expected completion time of shipment

December 31, 2011​

※ Because of the expected completion time, may be around.
 
I think the sunset has been and gone personally. Even the Boots stuff my dad used to get has disappeared from our local stores and when my dad asked they said they were not going to stock any more.
 
Just think of all those expensive APS SLRs people bought which will soon become paper weights.
I think we should be entitled to our money back.
 
Popped into my local Boots yesterday and they had none, which they certainly did last time I looked in.

Still, I took advantage of a 3 for 2 on their own process-paid slide film and Kodak BW400CN :)
 
When i checked about 20 minutes ago, Bristol cameras website has some fuji nexia 200 for sale, about £6 a roll for a 25 exposure roll, not exactly cheap...
 
Just think of all those expensive APS SLRs people bought which will soon become paper weights.
I think we should be entitled to our money back.

And, ironically, more images are probably being produced at APS-C digital size at the moment than any other sort of camera! :eek:
 
tbh, aside from the obvious shenanigans about film being gradually eroded. APS was a doomed format from the start, same as 110. Too small to be any use really. 35mm is really as small as you want to go with film unless you are very fine grained film.

/ducks and hides.
 
tbh, aside from the obvious shenanigans about film being gradually eroded. APS was a doomed format from the start, same as 110. Too small to be any use really. 35mm is really as small as you want to go with film unless you are very fine grained film.

/ducks and hides.

I disagree about 110 film, when used with a high quality camera and lenses you can get some quite good results out of it. Admittedly the shots from the only cartridge I've put through my Pentax Auto 110 were not too great as they were overexposed 1 stop (why did anyone ever make ISO 200 film when only ISO 80/100 and ISO 320/400 settings were in the 110 specification???) and had somewhat wacky colours as the film was 5 years out of date; but they were not actually that grainy and were quite sharp.

With todays emulsions I'm sure that much better results could be got than when 110 was popular in the 70's and 80's. I mean imagine putting Ektar or Portra 400 through it, I'm sure they would be good. Plus most 110 shots then were through very basic cameras with quite poor lenses.
 
Richard

I've sent you a pm.

offline

offline...

If you have some information pertinent to this thread, please do us a favour and share it with everyone.

If you just want to pass a personal message to Richard, then feel free to do so but don't clutter the thread up with these kind of messages.

And I'm sure you're not attempting to do so, but please remember, we have a classified section for selling items, and all trading attempts need to be done within there. I'm well aware that some of the F&C denizens don't venture outside of the ghetto, so generally turn a blind eye to a reminder/notice post if people have got something up for sale, but any selling via PM or outwith the classifieds section is frowned upon, and has been known to earn people certain loss of priveliges...

You may be surprised to learn that your presumably innocent post has been reported a number of times already, and as such we have to look into it...



Mark
(with his MOD's hat on for once!)
 
Okay - for the sake of clarity - offline has been in contact with me, and explained that the PM was regarding his local Sainsburys store selling off the last of their stock along with an offer to get them for the OP if still there and still wanted...

This kind of thing is in a bit of a grey area within TP's rules on trading, but as it was a favour, and a no profit offer, I'm inclined to let things go this time.

If anyone is in a similar situation in future, please RTM the original post, and explain in your RTM what you are considering offering to do. We'll have a quick conflab, and get back to you with our recommended course of action.


Cheers


Now - can I please take the MOD hat off for a while :)
 
offline...

If you have some information pertinent to this thread, please do us a favour and share it with everyone.

If you just want to pass a personal message to Richard, then feel free to do so but don't clutter the thread up with these kind of messages.

And I'm sure you're not attempting to do so, but please remember, we have a classified section for selling items, and all trading attempts need to be done within there. I'm well aware that some of the F&C denizens don't venture outside of the ghetto, so generally turn a blind eye to a reminder/notice post if people have got something up for sale, but any selling via PM or outwith the classifieds section is frowned upon, and has been known to earn people certain loss of priveliges...

You may be surprised to learn that your presumably innocent post has been reported a number of times already, and as such we have to look into it...



Mark
(with his MOD's hat on for once!)

Okay - for the sake of clarity - offline has been in contact with me, and explained that the PM was regarding his local Sainsburys store selling off the last of their stock along with an offer to get them for the OP if still there and still wanted...

This kind of thing is in a bit of a grey area within TP's rules on trading, but as it was a favour, and a no profit offer, I'm inclined to let things go this time.

If anyone is in a similar situation in future, please RTM the original post, and explain in your RTM what you are considering offering to do. We'll have a quick conflab, and get back to you with our recommended course of action.


Cheers


Now - can I please take the MOD hat off for a while :)

I feel that I need to say something about these last two posts. First of all the whole essence of offline sending me a PM was to help me, a fellow TP member and for no other reason, with no gain for himself, in fact some inconvenience to himself.

I recognise that some members may have smelt a rat as they say and therefore reported the post, but following that there seems to have been some assumptions made together with posts before any looking into was carried out.

Should offline have had information relating to the thread topic, he does not, nor does any member have to share it should they wish not to.

If the report of this post was looked into, why was there details about trying to trade outside the classifieds, surely after looking into the detail of the post this would have been seen to be completely unnecessary.

The actual reason for the PM has been described as a grey area within the TP rules on trading can someone explain why and where this grey area is, I for one have seen many posts where member offer to acquire an item and send it on and looking again at the T&C,s cannot find anything.

Now offline may have made a Fax pas in posting that he had sent a PM without indicating why, but for that to now result in advise that we are to RTM and ask if we can PM a member information or an offer of help is I think ridiculous.

I must say that I have made this post has the post,s by TBY (mod) have brought the situation into the open forum and being in bright blue type seem to convey I different significance.

All points made with sincere concern only.

Richard.
 
I feel that I need to say something about these last two posts. First of all the whole essence of offline sending me a PM was to help me, a fellow TP member and for no other reason, with no gain for himself, in fact some inconvenience to himself.

I recognise that some members may have smelt a rat as they say and therefore reported the post, but following that there seems to have been some assumptions made together with posts before any looking into was carried out.

Should offline have had information relating to the thread topic, he does not, nor does any member have to share it should they wish not to.

If the report of this post was looked into, why was there details about trying to trade outside the classifieds, surely after looking into the detail of the post this would have been seen to be completely unnecessary.

The actual reason for the PM has been described as a grey area within the TP rules on trading can someone explain why and where this grey area is, I for one have seen many posts where member offer to acquire an item and send it on and looking again at the T&C,s cannot find anything.

Now offline may have made a Fax pas in posting that he had sent a PM without indicating why, but for that to now result in advise that we are to RTM and ask if we can PM a member information or an offer of help is I think ridiculous.

I must say that I have made this post has the post,s by TBY (mod) have brought the situation into the open forum and being in bright blue type seem to convey I different significance.

All points made with sincere concern only.

Richard.

Richard, I think that perhaps this needs to be put in the wider context of the forum. F&C is generally quite a friendly place with very little trouble but more widely there are rule breaking episodes quite frequently and we as a community should try to help police this. Also of note is the fact that PMs are just that and I believe that the mods cannot read them, so don't know what goes on. Therefore they have to make enquiries and it is best that they tell us what has gone on as it may otherwise look as if wrong-doing has either been ignored or gone unpunished. That would not be good for us as a community.

I can understand where you are coming from but I think that above may show some of the other side of this.
 
Richard

you're quite right to say that offline does not need to share his knowledge with the rest of the forum, but I would think that he might Want to do so - after all, it's part of what the forums supposed to be about.

my Initial post was to serve a couple of purposes...

1 - To prevent any more reports of potential off-classifieds trading. Simply seeing that a Mod had posted in the thread directly below offline's message saved anyone else reporting the message, ie to show we were "on the case" so to speak... This had to be done promptly, otherwise we may have had many more reports.

2 - to serve as a gentle reminder that we don't allow trading outside the classifieds. Despite what seems to be the popular belief - staff are unable to read other members PM's - they are just that PRIVATE MESSAGES. Hence, my message had to cover a number of options - it might have been that offline simply wanted to contact you re something in another thread, and he'd decided to flag it up in here. It MIGHT have been that he had a pallet of APS film tha he wanted to knock out at a fiver a roll. And thankfully, it turns out that he's a thoroughly nice guy, who wanted to do you a favour. My point is from a simple "you've got PM" message we can't tell - and neither can the people who reported the message.

The last thing I want is for people to stop doing favours of this nature. I think it's one of the best parts of being in a community like this, and indeed I'm not averse to doing the odd favour for my friends in F&C myself, as I'm sure some of you will remember.

When I say it's a grey area in the classifieds/trading rules, what I mean is that I would like to see a simple line in the rules stating that non-profit altruism of this nature is allowable, and I'll be mentioning this in the staff room once I finish this missive.

That way, we can be completely open about it - offline could have simply said "Our Sainsburies are selling some film off at £xx, how many rolls do you want me to pick up for you?" in open forum, nobody would have had to RTM him, I wouldn't have had to upset everyone in a forum I consider my "comfortable place" and we could all go back to taking photographs and lurking in darkrooms.

There have been quite a few threads that I remember where people have offered to "pick things up" for another member, in open forum, which have gone well for all parties concerned. Since I've been on the staff, when i've seen one of these, I've made a point of posting in the thread, stating what a good idea it was, or what a nice gesture it was - partly because I believe it IS a good thing to do, and partly to save RTM's appearing in the staff room's inbox.

I suggested that a quick RTM might be a good idea, just so staff are aware of any favours, purely because I'm not around all the time, and I do think that some form of staff "stamp of approval" on these kind of threads is a good idea - if nothing else it saves people getting the wrong idea about whats going on.

I'm sorry you didn't like the blue messages, Richard, but it was for a reason - I DID want people to sit up and take notice - primarily you and offline (I do so hate calling people by their forum name rather than a proper name - it seems so cold!) The first message was to elicit a response and to stop any further RTMs - the second was to explain everything was ok. To have typed the second normally, would, by your own admission given it a lesser impact, and therefore it also needed to be in "MOD MESSAGE BLUE" - it's a standard formatting used by the staff - bold blue for messages to be considered from the mods/admins as a whole, bold red for warnings.
Still - as this is my explaination of why things were dealt with this way, at least I can type this in normal spindly black ;)

I'd just like to add, on a personal note, that I never meant any offence to either of the parties involved, and I hope that it won't put people off from doing each other favours in the future - i'd just like to see it enshrined in the rules that it's okay to do so.
 
Richard, I think that perhaps this needs to be put in the wider context of the forum. F&C is generally quite a friendly place with very little trouble but more widely there are rule breaking episodes quite frequently and we as a community should try to help police this. Also of note is the fact that PMs are just that and I believe that the mods cannot read them, so don't know what goes on. Therefore they have to make enquiries and it is best that they tell us what has gone on as it may otherwise look as if wrong-doing has either been ignored or gone unpunished. That would not be good for us as a community.

I can understand where you are coming from but I think that above may show some of the other side of this.

Jim - you're quite right - we can't read PM's - nor would we want to - I'm a moderator on TP, not a member of the Stasi. Both my posts were done in the spirit of openness and clarity - I wanted people to know we were looking into things, and I wanted to make it clear that things were all hunky-dory afterwards. You're also spot on about it being in the wider context of the rest of the forum - until I went green I didn't realise just how much rule breaking.bending went on in and around classifieds and off-classified selling - over 90% of modding time seems to be spent slapping wrists, deleting posts and sending invalid threads to the naughty step, hence the much stronger rules for classifieds, and the much heavier "policing" of anything of that nature.
 
Hi Mark,

I've seen plenty of forums all over the net where the mods wouldn't have posted a clear, well worded explanation of why they did something in a case such as this. Fair play - it definitely helps keep the forum friendly :clap:.

+1 for me for adding an explicit altruism clause in the selling rules and no problem if (when?!) it also state these offers have to be made in the open.
 
Back on topic - I was in the Boots up on the triangle near the uni in Bristol yesterday and they definitely had some APS film still in stock. I'm afraid I won't get a chance to get in a pick any up for people until the week after next though.
 
Jim - you're quite right - we can't read PM's - nor would we want to - I'm a moderator on TP, not a member of the Stasi. Both my posts were done in the spirit of openness and clarity - I wanted people to know we were looking into things, and I wanted to make it clear that things were all hunky-dory afterwards. You're also spot on about it being in the wider context of the rest of the forum - until I went green I didn't realise just how much rule breaking.bending went on in and around classifieds and off-classified selling - over 90% of modding time seems to be spent slapping wrists, deleting posts and sending invalid threads to the naughty step, hence the much stronger rules for classifieds, and the much heavier "policing" of anything of that nature.

I think most of us non-greenies don't understand the responsibility at all. We often only see the high profile modding that goes on.

Hi Mark,

I've seen plenty of forums all over the net where the mods wouldn't have posted a clear, well worded explanation of why they did something in a case such as this. Fair play - it definitely helps keep the forum friendly :clap:.

+1 for me for adding an explicit altruism clause in the selling rules and no problem if (when?!) it also state these offers have to be made in the open.

Agreed, we have a great mod team here. I am lucky that the two internet forums I have frequented mostly have had great teams, the other being Hexus.
 
I'd just like to add, on a personal note, that I never meant any offence to either of the parties involved, and I hope that it won't put people off from doing each other favours in the future - i'd just like to see it enshrined in the rules that it's okay to do so.

No offence taken here, just a bit stunned at how it escalated! I'll RTM whenever I'm in doubt in future.

Apologies to all for any concern I've caused.

In an effort to get back on topic...

At the risk of causing Sainsbury's to sell out before I have chance to buy any, some branches seem to be selling off their last few stocks of APS at £1.50 for a twin pack of Fuji nexia 25xp.

If you love your APS camera and want to carry on using it, now *is* time to stock up on film.
 
Mark,

Thank you very much for your reply, which although not expected or required, was appreciated and I understand all of what you say, However after the post was RTM,d, maybe the "looking into" should have just been just that and then the problem as it was identified would have been put to bed with a, RTM investigated and the PM was legitimate and within rules?
However I do understand the complexities of what you have to do and respect that very much.
Your friend and TP member.

Richard.
 
walsh, re the APS film, what price is it, and what is the name of the camera shop.?
 
walsh, Thanks for that. I have used them in the past for cameras, and they are first class, so I will bear them in mind for APS film.
 
pityacka said:
walsh, Thanks for that. I have used them in the past for cameras, and they are first class, so I will bear them in mind for APS film.

No problem, glad I could help!
 
The big Boots in Bond Street had 3 rolls of 40exp. APS left in their photo department.
 
FWIW, Boots' branch at Purley Way in Croydon had a lot of APS film on the shelves when I popped in last Saturday, including some 5 x 24 exp. Fuji 'Holiday Pack' bags and Fuji and Boots own brand individual films. I think there was some Kodak stuff there too.
 
Rob, how much were they?
 
Back
Top