You can attach a monitor to the USB-c port. but unlike the air and pro, you can only attach one external monitor, and only to the faster port.
Unike the air and pro, only one the ports is a "fast" port. the other is a usb-2 speed.
I don't know :-(Is it a built in limitation or could you run a second monitor through a hub? I run a couple of 27" screens from my 3 year old Lenovo and that's only got a lowish spec Ryzen chip set.
It looks like a hardware limitation of the GPU onboard the A18 SOC, like the 1st gen Apple Silicon MacBook AirPretty sure no.
usb 2 in 2026!, classic appleusb-2 speed
To be fair to Apple, this is a good looking, fairly capable laptop for a fair price. There are always going to be limitations and I presume there is nothing stopping you putting a dock onto the faster port and sharing that bandwidth whilst charging using the slower port. Apple are not suggesting that this is the answer for every user and if you want more then pay more and get an Air and if that is insufficient then get a Pro.usb 2 in 2026!, classic apple
To be fair to Apple, this is a good looking, fairly capable laptop for a fair price. There are always going to be limitations and I presume there is nothing stopping you putting a dock onto the faster port and sharing that bandwidth whilst charging using the slower port. Apple are not suggesting that this is the answer for every user and if you want more then pay more and get an Air and if that is insufficient then get a Pro.
I think it's being seen as the "charger" port, leaving you a faster port for a docking station. If you plug an external drive or something similar into the slow port, you get a warning message telling you to use the other port for better speed.usb 2 in 2026!, classic apple
I love apple more than most people but I think it was to keep ppl buying the more expensive models, if the Neo could drive two displays it would cannibalize the entry level airs etc, I cant see there being a significant cost difference when usb 3 has been round 10+ years ( in my humble usually very wrong opinion)To be fair to Apple, this is a good looking, fairly capable laptop for a fair price. There are always going to be limitations and I presume there is nothing stopping you putting a dock onto the faster port and sharing that bandwidth whilst charging using the slower port. Apple are not suggesting that this is the answer for every user and if you want more then pay more and get an Air and if that is insufficient then get a Pro.
Yes but it does look niceThis is one of the things that put me off Apple. I don't want to spend the time and effort to have dangly things hanging from my laptop to overcome limitations. I know Apple have their fans and probably rightly so but for people who can't be bothered, like me, there seem to be too many niggles to overcome with cables and adapters and dangling things.
Yes but it does look nice
I think it's being seen as the "charger" port, leaving you a faster port for a docking station. If you plug an external drive or something similar into the slow port, you get a warning message telling you to use the other port for better speed.
I suppose they need to save their money somewhere, and it needs to be looked at in terms of how little it costs.
Here is a (long) comparison between a Neo and an M4 Macbook Pro with 48gb Ram, specifically for LR/PS and come 4k video editing.
With some exceptions, the Neo does pretty well.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBFi-JTQZhk
Shock horror, Apples £600 laptop isn't as good as their £2800 laptop.
You simply can't truly compare a machine at £599 with one over 4.5 time the cost at £2799. I do think many are missing the point the Neo is a £600 machine it should not be expected to compete with a near £3000 one.
It depends on the premise of the comparison. I'm not sure I've noticed anyone expecting it to "compete" with a £3000 machine?You simply can't truly compare a machine at £599 with one over 4.5 time the cost at £2799. I do think many are missing the point the Neo is a £600 machine it should not be expected to compete with a near £3000 one.
Do we expect a Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 to be as good as a Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM, they are both from Canon and both 300mm, but of course we don't expect the same performance, and no full-time pro sports tog will buy one, it's horse for courses.
Sort of an aside, as I'm in a position of needing to replace my 2012 MacBook Pro, but also have an M1 Mac Studio (I prefer desktops) as my main machine, I have been sufficiently interested to study several of the reviews that are available.TBH I don't know if it's good or not, and I'm not interested *enough* to watch reviews. I would probably compare it to a non-Apple laptop at £600, and my expectation is that in some areas is would be significantly better, while in others it might well be well good. £500-£600 is about the sweetspot for a tradeoff between low cost and acceptable performance, and it's essential to know what sacrifices you're will to make. Personally I think it's great to have an option at this level provided we're going to be realistic about what to expect.
I only really need the laptop for travel, where I use it for checking and backing up the day's photographs,
If you look much earlier in this thread, this was pretty much my use case also - I was in the Apple Store to collect my pre order and was kind of talked out of collecting as we agreed that it probably would not be good value for me, it was claimed that it¡d be much happier editing iphone photos and video rather than raw filesI only really need the laptop for travel, where I use it for checking and backing up the day's photographs, along with basic writing/browsing/emails both away and at home watching TV. The reviews suggest that is also perfectly fine for basic photo/video editing.
I'm not overly concerned about this for my purposes.10 Gbps USB might throttle the speed that backups can run at with two devices on the same bus. If it’s not a thousands of photos, that may not be a problem,, though.
You may well wait a long time for me to make up my mindIf you look much earlier in this thread, this was pretty much my use case also - I was in the Apple Store to collect my pre order and was kind of talked out of collecting as we agreed that it probably would not be good value for me, it was claimed that it¡d be much happier editing iphone photos and video rather than raw files
Had I pre ordered the Indigo rather than Citrus I would probably have found out for sure one way or the other by now.
If you buy one I'll be very interested in hearing how you get on. It isn’t that I cannot afford a MacBook Air, it is that I cannot justify spending that much more on a tool that'll have a limited use for me. £600 for the larger ssd (I qualify for Education discount) seemed a great deal.
You will be able to let me know how you get on with it thenI have watched it. I have a Mac Mini M4 Pro that does all the editing and not yet broken into a sweat doing it. I have a feeling that the Neo would be fine for us and it wouldn’t surprise me if I went back and bought one over the weekend. You have two weeks to return it if not what you want.
It's kind of an ipad that runs MacOS programs, with a keyboardI think @ancient_mariner has nailed it.
This is a device for those that are hovering between an iPad and an actual computer. For many, to make an iPad useful, you have to add a keyboard case. Which ups the price significantly. This has it all, proper computer applications, no greasy fingerprints on the screen, a built-in case.
I think @ancient_mariner has nailed it.
This is a device for those that are hovering between an iPad and an actual computer. For many, to make an iPad useful, you have to add a keyboard case. Which ups the price significantly. This has it all, proper computer applications, no greasy fingerprints on the screen, a built-in case.
Useful video, but not unexpectedly, the Air has much better benchmarks (and some features), but it still doesn't detract from how good the Neo is for the price.Another video showing the differences between M5 air and neo
View: https://youtu.be/2yXyvQSUSYY?si=pA9Ti9suspNqufvo
Yes fully appreciate that but it was just to highlight the differences between them. No doubt the Neo is great for basic stuff but I still don’t believe it leaves much scope to grow as things change, but that is my opinion obviously.Useful video, but not unexpectedly, the Air has much better benchmarks (and some features), but it still doesn't detract from how good the Neo is for the price.
For many people, the extra money for the Air, may well bring advantages they simply won't notice, and for many people the extra money for the Air is a "lot" of money to find.
I think that's right; "growing" would mean a new laptop, but it's back to it being "fit for purpose"Yes fully appreciate that but it was just to highlight the differences between them. No doubt the Neo is great for basic stuff but I still don’t believe it leaves much scope to grow as things change, but that is my opinion obviously.
Most of the reviews I've seen are by Mac users, but the reviews from people who review Windows and Mac machines are universally suggesting there is nothing from the Windows world (or Chrome) that can compete with the Neo at this price (at the moment).
I defer to your greater knowledge as I have not been looking for a Windows laptop for a good number of years. We use Dell laptops at work and both the construction of the case and quality of screen, to my eyes, looks far superior on the Neo. I suspect the Dell laptops cost much more.I think it depends on what you're locking for. Some of the reviewers don't look very hard.
For Neo money in the Windows world I'd expect an OLED touch screen and pen plus a decent Ryzen or Core Ultra,
It wouldn't have the Neo's battery life. It would have a decent case and keyboard - but not necessarily better or worse. And more connectivity.
So ....... to me the Neo is a £459 laptop. To me the Air is a £699 laptop that really needs a touch screen and an optional pen.
I have no opinion on the matter, but agree it will depend on what you are looking for. Certainly, there is not much point in looking for a touch screen on a Mac.I think it depends on what you're looking for. Some of the reviewers don't look very hard.
For Neo money in the Windows world I'd expect an OLED touch screen and pen plus a decent Ryzen or Core Ultra, ... and more RAM and storage
It wouldn't have the Neo's battery life. It would have a decent case and keyboard - but not necessarily better or worse. And more connectivity.
So ....... to me the Neo is a £459 laptop. To me the Air is a £699 laptop that really needs a touch screen and an optional pen.
Certainly, there is not much point in looking for a touch screen on a Mac.