Those shots really prove that in war no-one wins
Words can't say how I feel great photos. Photo no 37 says it all.
Where there are men there is money. Where there is money there is greed. Where there is greed there is war. This world we share will never be free of war in one place or another - this is the world POLITICIANS created.
Sorry Splog - we are all politicians whether we like it or not - we don't all get paid for it though.
Sorry Splog - we are all politicians whether we like it or not - However, those in the political arena do seem to have a remarkable ability to make massive profits for their own personal gain
Wonderful collection of shots, But so wish I hadn't looked at them as my son flew out there for his second tour yesterday so the constant worrying begins again.
22
Afghan miners work in a coal mine 100 km east of the western city of Herat on June 26, 2010 in Afghanistan. A US survey has uncovered at least one trillion dollars worth of mineral deposits in Afghanistan, however with barely any mining industry or infrastructure in place in the war torn country, there are doubts as to how Afghanistan will be able to manage this windfall. (Majid Saeedi/Getty Images) #
mmmmmmm i doubt any afghan's will manage any of the windfall after the americans put there flag on it and claim it's there's when they show them how to mine it
Sorry Andy! not true ... Please allow me another edit ...
Quite right too - what's the point of fighting for a country if you don't see any benefit afterwards?
Speaking as one who's been to both Afghanistan and Iraq and had friends and colleagues killed in both places, I for one am sick of fighting for places that don't appreciate the sacrifice we make for their freedoms as well as seeing all the material benefits of reconstruction go to greedy politicians and industrialists in countries not involved in the peace-keeping efforts.
It used to be that you got to keep what you fought for - not any longer...
Those mineral deposits have been there since the dawn of time - they 'belong' to whoever has the money and expertise to get them out of the ground.
From what I've seen, the average Afghan is more than content to sit in his own s*** picking his nose. If he wasn't, then he'd have done something about it about the same time as we in Europe did 500 years ago...
I have nothing but the greatest respect and gratitude for anybody killed and injured over there
but the attitude that you get to keep what you fight for is the one sure way to ensure those countries never leave the third world and that we have to keep on fighting for it.
Quite right too - what's the point of fighting for a country if you don't see any benefit afterwards?
Speaking as one who's been to both Afghanistan and Iraq and had friends and colleagues killed in both places, I for one am sick of fighting for places that don't appreciate the sacrifice we make for their freedoms as well as seeing all the material benefits of reconstruction go to greedy politicians and industrialists in countries not involved in the peace-keeping efforts.
It used to be that you got to keep what you fought for - not any longer...
Those mineral deposits have been there since the dawn of time - they 'belong' to whoever has the money and expertise to get them out of the ground.
From what I've seen, the average Afghan is more than content to sit in his own s*** picking his nose. If he wasn't, then he'd have done something about it about the same time as we in Europe did 500 years ago...
some people win by wars, the arms dealers!!! buy one missile get one free
You obviously don't have much experience of the arms (defence) industry to make such a ludicrous statement.
If you believe the government who sent our troops too Afghanistan and is still keeping them there then we are not fighting for their country we are fighting to defend our own from the terrorist attacks.
If we are fighting for the right to exploit the mineral resources of the country then we are not a liberating force bringing freedom but a conquering force comming to take over.
I no longer have any concept of why our troops are fighting and dieing in Afghanistan but I hope that your opinions are not representetive of those held by our troops on the ground.
Actually it is - very few of my colleagues were under any illusions about the war in Iraq being anything other than about oil and money.
If anything, my views lean on the 'bleeding-heart liberal' side of things compared to many who've actually been there... their opinions tend to be of the "Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out' variety...
Afghanistan is another matter - initially it went well, but due to the US effoert being side-tracked by Iraq, not enough progress was made in the early days when it could have made a difference.
Too much time has now elapsed for any concrete gains to me made without significant investments of manpower and resources...now begs the question: who pays for it all?
If mineral resources have been found in Afghanistan then fine - they will pay us for the privelige of freeing them from the shackles of stone-age demagogues and tyrants and dragging them screaming and kicking into the 19th century (it's too much of a strech to bring them all right up to date).
Just as Iraqi oil is now paying the West for the past 8 years of 'involvement', then Afghan mineral wealth can pay for what we're doing there now - or would you rather foot the bill?
Personally I'd rather we didn't send our troops to invade backwards third world countries at massive expense and needless loss of life.
Sadly the UK as always will do badly out of the repair, rebuild and restructure contracts as the likes of France and Germany come in to hoover up the pieces that they didn't pay for in blood and bullets.
If it was upto me I'd leave Afghanistan to fall back into the stoneage where it was rotting before our invasion, I don't buy into the theory that we are preventing terrorist attacks in the UK. If that was really the aim then we would have invaded Pakistan as well but of course they have a nuclear capability which is currently guarenteed imunity from agression by America and her obedient lap dog.
Personally I'd rather we didn't send our troops to invade backwards third world countries at massive expense and needless loss of life.
Sadly the UK as always will do badly out of the repair, rebuild and restructure contracts as the likes of France and Germany come in to hoover up the pieces that they didn't pay for in blood and bullets.
If it was upto me I'd leave Afghanistan to fall back into the stoneage where it was rotting before our invasion, I don't buy into the theory that we are preventing terrorist attacks in the UK. If that was really the aim then we would have invaded Pakistan as well but of course they have a nuclear capability which is currently guarenteed imunity from agression by America and her obedient lap dog.
Are you seriously saying war is not good for the defence industry?
I don't think there is much doubt that it will fall back and rapidly too as soon as the allies leave.
Our presence in Afghanistan is doing nothing to stop the growth of Al Q. in Yemen, Somalia and other such hellholes.
.