BlackCloud
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,795
- Edit My Images
- No
Thanks for the heads up re the petrols. Hadn't gotten around to doing my research yet as new car will be next year.
£800 for a tow bar sounds excessive. I bought one from ebay scrappy for the passat for just £50; another £50 to install.
I have a Yet 1.8 petrol. 2014 L&K model. Best new car I've ever owned - and I've worked in and around the motor trade in my past life. Didn't want a diesel 'cos my day-to-day motoring consists of short runs along unmade tracks.Will be seriously considering a Yeti next year. A bit undecided presently but the 1.8 petrol looks interesting. (mostly short trips for me, a diesel/dpf would be a concern).
For the amount a Dacia loses in just a year, you can have much better cars on PCP plans. After 5 years a Dacia will be pretty much worthless.I think those Dacia Cars look pretty good, whats the warranty on them 3 years or 5 years?
I would get one to keep for say 5 years then you jave dealt with the depreciation and had a decent car for not a lot.
people on here are by the nature of the hobby "luxurists" its not like this site is full of people on low incomes or who need to be carefull and frugle.
Stepway looks very nice.
true but you cannot do 100,000 miles on a PCP plan.For the amount a Dacia loses in just a year, you can have much better cars on PCP plans. After 5 years a Dacia will be pretty much worthless.
Like I said, for the amount a Dacia will lose in a year you can get much better cars on PCP. The Sandero is a similar style vehicle to the Ford Ecosport, the latter in Titanium trim level costs over £18k but can be had for under £2,500 for a year, the Sandero will have lost about £3500 over the same period according to Parkers price guides.Horlicks nilagin, Dacias have the same depreciation as most other vehicles the difference is you start out with a much lower price point so the second hand value is lower.
When I traded mine last year I got top book price for it which in itself doesn't mean much but I was very happy with the figure.
Don't think I'll be wanting to be driving 20k a year in a Duster.Tr
true but you cannot do 100,000 miles on a PCP plan.
You can on a duster in 5 years and then yes its worthless.
Like I said, for the amount a Dacia will lose in a year you can get much better cars on PCP. The Sandero is a similar style vehicle to the Ford Ecosport, the latter in Titanium trim level costs over £18k but can be had for under £2,500 for a year, the Sandero will have lost about £3500 over the same period according to Parkers price guides.
According to Parkers, Sandero's start at over £8500 and go up to over £10k, after a year they are worth £5k and £7k respectively. Even Parkers only really recommends them as a second hand buy but only for a second car or a new driver, as they will be so cheap. You may as well buy a 2nd hand car for £10k than buy a Dacia, you'll lose a darn sight less in 5 years.If a new sandero is £5995 and you would hope to get 5 years motoring from it then that's only £1200 a year - less than half the cost of the ford! If the car lasts over 5 years then it's quids in.
dacia's own website says that a sandero is £5995 for the basic model http://www.dacia.co.uk/vehicles/sandero/According to Parkers, Sandero's start at over £8500 and go up to over £10k, after a year they are worth £5k and £7k respectively. Even Parkers only really recommends them as a second hand buy but only for a second car or a new driver, as they will be so cheap. You may as well buy a 2nd hand car for £10k than buy a Dacia, you'll lose a darn sight less in 5 years.
I have a Yet 1.8 petrol. 2014 L&K model. Best new car I've ever owned - and I've worked in and around the motor trade in my past life. Didn't want a diesel 'cos my day-to-day motoring consists of short runs along unmade tracks.
Knocking around the locality on short, low-gear journeys I get about 30mpg. A trip up the motorway at 70-80 gives about 38mpg. I use the quite quick acceleration to its best! But they're not the most aerodynamic of cars.Just wondered if these are thirsty on petrol. A review I read it suggests they are. I'm used to a 2 litre petrol anyway, but the Skoda was made out to be quite uneconomical?
I was talking about the Stepway variant which others had already mentioned. You could still buy a far better 2nd hand car for £6k and still not suffer the depreciation,dacia's own website says that a sandero is £5995 for the basic model http://www.dacia.co.uk/vehicles/sandero/
there is no way i'd ever spend £10k on a second hand motor when god knows what could go wrong and you have no idea how it was treated by the previous owner(s)
the idea of buying a cheap new sandero and "pimping it up" with lots of add ons and extras (fancy paint, aircon, alloys etc) to bring it up to £8500-£10000 to me seems very silly as you may a well just get a more expensive car to start with.
As the base Fiesta is only 59bhp, of course the Renault 0.9 Turbo engine would perform better. Next time try the Ford 1.0 turbo engine. about 10bhp and 30Nm of torque more, in the lower powered version or 50bhp and 60Nm of torque in the most powerful version of the same engine.The Sandero had the new Renault 0.9 turbo petrol engine and the performance was good much better than the (basic) Fiesta we hired this year - I preferred the Sandero to the Ford, which is maybe near twice the price and the Stepway was pretty good
all petrol engines
If you were in S Africa why weren't you driving a V8 anyway.
As the base Fiesta is only 59bhp,
.
In France the dealers will not give a discount on new Dacias - not even 2%
I never understood why people go for vehicles that look like a 4wd but isn't a 4wd. Seems like lipstick on a pig to me.Cost me £550 to rent the car for 7 weeks
In France they have just started supplying the Duster with the 1.2 TCE 125bhp Petrol engine - top spec - 2WD under £13k
I never understood why people go for vehicles that look like a 4wd but isn't a 4wd. Seems like lipstick on a pig to me.
4WD is Euros 2k more
the correct tyres on a 2WD are very effective
I never understood why people go for vehicles that look like a 4wd but isn't a 4wd. Seems like lipstick on a pig to me.
Same could be said for people who buy a 4wd but don't really need it. I'd imagine buying a pseudo 4wd would be down to driving position and the function of the vehicle and knowing 4wd won't be needed just wasting fuel etc. Better to have intelligent 4wd where it comes in when 2wd can't cope.
Get the logan then, still £3K cheaper and more spaceUK Dusters come with all season Mud&Snow tyres which do well in most conditions. The Sandero doesn't have anything like the same space in the rear or the same engine or the same wheels or the same tyres...
Absolutely. The driving position is a farcical as it really isn't a high up vehicle. And we are making it worse with all the late arrivals to the '4wd' market since there are now so many, the driving position for normal driving barely provides any advantage anymore. Driving and handling are all compromises. Each to their own choice, I find it pointless...And hilarious to see them drive around puddles and all sorts...Same could be said for people who buy a 4wd but don't really need it. I'd imagine buying a pseudo 4wd would be down to driving position and the function of the vehicle and knowing 4wd won't be needed just wasting fuel etc. Better to have intelligent 4wd where it comes in when 2wd can't cope.
Absolutely rubbish regarding the PCP for minor nicks. There are very clear rules about that which are very generous indeed, including scuffs on wheels etc. The rules are clearly available for all in that industry.If you have your fabia garaged and have a power socket get an intelligent charger leave the clips on the battery and when not in use connect your charger cost probably less than £100
Diesel Duster vs Petrol weigh up how many miles over your five year spell calculate cost for both fuels if the diesel will cost less for the fuel sounds like a winner
Would not touch PCP could cost you a mint for minor nicks etc when you turn it in
Just my 2cents
Sorry in the past I worked checking returned cars and many would be horrified how much some companies charged for nothing so in this case I think clear rules are absolute rubbishAbsolutely rubbish regarding the PCP for minor nicks. There are very clear rules about that which are very generous indeed, including scuffs on wheels etc. The rules are clearly available for all in that industry.
How long ago was the past? The BVRLA Fair Wear and Tear rules define it clearly and ambiguously. I think scratches up to 2.5cm or wheel scuff unto 2.5cm for example is pretty generous. Chips are acceptable. Dents unto 1cm unless paint has been broken. Just to name a few examples out of the guidelines. If you got bigger issues than that, then I think it is fair enough to get charged if you haven't fixed it yourself.Sorry in the past I worked checking returned cars and many would be horrified how much some companies charged for nothing so in this case I think clear rules are absolute rubbish
But maybe all would not agree with youHow long ago was the past? The BVRLA Fair Wear and Tear rules define it clearly and ambiguously. I think scratches up to 2.5cm or wheel scuff unto 2.5cm for example is pretty generous. Chips are acceptable. Dents unto 1cm unless paint has been broken. Just to name a few examples out of the guidelines. If you got bigger issues than that, then I think it is fair enough to get charged if you haven't fixed it yourself.
I'm glad you wanted to clarify as that is not what I said. I merely responded to your comment;But maybe all would not agree with you
Let's clarify I said I would not touch PCP you want a PCP go for it its your money not worth the chance for me and let's remember the company who does your PCP will charge interest on the final balloon payment do the calculations from start to end PCP carries cost
As said you do what you fancy but my choice not wanting PCP is not absolutely rubbish as you claimed
Indeed just your two cents. However as I've demonstrated and quantified it doesn't cost you a mint for minor nicks. In fact the minor nicks are rather generous I would say as highlighted above.Would not touch PCP could cost you a mint for minor nicks etc when you turn it in
Just my 2cents
Your points are worth what in relation to the ops post zero you appear to enjoy argument for the point of arguingI'm glad you wanted to clarify as that is not what I said. I merely responded to your comment;
Indeed just your two cents. However as I've demonstrated and quantified it doesn't cost you a mint for minor nicks. In fact the minor nicks are rather generous I would say as highlighted above.
If you don't want PCP then absolutely fine I won't loose any sleep over it, but please don't spread urban myths that just aren't true. I only get an PCP if it is cheaper than leasing, or if it is cheaper than buying. I always do my sums and are not fussed about the financial construct buy/lease/contract purchase whatever...Whichever is the best deal....
Ahem the BVRLA is not just an opinion @border_all, that is a well established body to which the leasing and finance providers signup to.Your points are worth what in relation to the ops post zero you appear to enjoy argument for the point of arguing
I offered a cheap method for op and suggested a method of deciding diesel or petrol. Other responders had suggested PCP I pointed out I would not use PCP
What you consider urban myths are still only your opinion I am not in court defending a point on oath maybe you consider yourself more informed or perhaps presently sell promote PCP that's fine by me and I will not continue defending my own position that I will not take a PCP I own my car outright that is the way I shall continue purchasing in the future
The BVRLA is just a view that is in use today are you really saying that no corporations or national bodies ever get it wrong has VW found a way to circumnavigate emissions have MOT standards never had modification is food never demonised then found better than what other people select as an alternativeAhem the BVRLA is not just an opinion @border_all, that is a well established body to which the leasing and finance providers signup to.
As I said I'm merely correcting some misinformation that you are broadcasting, where you want a PCP or not that is totally your choice, which false reasons you want to argue to yourself that is also totally your reason. I'm merely bringing some balance in it by saying that it just is not true that a PCP could cost you a mint for minor nicks. That was an unfounded statement.
Naturally each person should do what they are most comfortable with. Me, being the product from Yorkshire/Scotland, I like to spend the least of my hard earned money and will do the sums and until such time not exclude any option.