All the gear - no idea?

Have we met? :lol:
I've just looked at your "first pics" thread, Gary, and was incredibly impressed by those photos. By your own admission you spent hours experimenting with the camera, so you're hardly my target.

With respect to my mate & the Saab, I am / was neither angry nor jealous of him - I was just absolutely surprised at his "ignorance". I came to cars late, having ridden bikes (on & off) for about a decade, and I admit that I wasn't terribly knowledgeable about bikes throughout much of the time I rode them. But I just always figured blokes who were "into" cars had grown up being into cars, read all about them as teenagers & all that kind of thing. I guess I have this expectation of teenage boys knowing all the specifications, the difference between the mark 2 & the mark 3, and all that sort of thing. As someone who wasn't into cars, I knew what ABS was by the age of 14.

Matey's Saab was a 4-door hatchback thing, so it provoked no emotion for me - it's basically mid-engines that I lust after, and it's those that I do get wound up about if they're "wasted". Seems funny that you'd drive an Elise on L-plates, but again you took it on the track a week after you passed your test, and IIRC you describe it as "fun to drive", so you're not the target of my ire there, either. It's mid-engined sports cars driven as if they were a minivan... I can't say I'm entirely rational about this, maybe I do suffer from the green-eyed monster, but I think owning a sports car just to "look cool"... well, it's somehow symptomatic of consumer culture. I'm not immune to consumerism myself, but I want a mid-engined car so I can better enjoy driving fast down twisty roads, and frankly can't imagine ever being able to afford one (but would be tracking it on a regular basis if I did, better to learn it & avoid killing myself).

Ironically, when I rode bikes I was a reverse-snob about it. I never cared for or about super-bikes when I was a crap rider, but once I became good (following 10 months of dispatch riding) I would turn up my nose if I saw a bike with loads of plastic fairing and no scrapes on the footpegs. It really didn't bother me, I just felt smug to myself & self-satisfied at seeing it - I guess this is because I knew my worn old BMW was just absolutely perfect for me, and I loved riding it.

I wonder if it's sports cars that wind me up because they're exactly the sort of thing that people buy to "prove" they're successful. Nice car, nice house, keeping up with the Joneses. I hate all that, and I guess I do find it hard to comprehend people spending the price of a small house (some places) on something that'll be rusting on the scrapheap in a few years. I would probably develop quite a different perspective if I were wealthier!

Stroller.
 
I've just looked at your "first pics" thread, Gary, and was incredibly impressed by those photos. By your own admission you spent hours experimenting with the camera, so you're hardly my target.

With respect to my mate & the Saab, I am / was neither angry nor jealous of him - I was just absolutely surprised at his "ignorance". I came to cars late, having ridden bikes (on & off) for about a decade, and I admit that I wasn't terribly knowledgeable about bikes throughout much of the time I rode them. But I just always figured blokes who were "into" cars had grown up being into cars, read all about them as teenagers & all that kind of thing. I guess I have this expectation of teenage boys knowing all the specifications, the difference between the mark 2 & the mark 3, and all that sort of thing. As someone who wasn't into cars, I knew what ABS was by the age of 14.

Matey's Saab was a 4-door hatchback thing, so it provoked no emotion for me - it's basically mid-engines that I lust after, and it's those that I do get wound up about if they're "wasted". Seems funny that you'd drive an Elise on L-plates, but again you took it on the track a week after you passed your test, and IIRC you describe it as "fun to drive", so you're not the target of my ire there, either. It's mid-engined sports cars driven as if they were a minivan... I can't say I'm entirely rational about this, maybe I do suffer from the green-eyed monster, but I think owning a sports car just to "look cool"... well, it's somehow symptomatic of consumer culture. I'm not immune to consumerism myself, but I want a mid-engined car so I can better enjoy driving fast down twisty roads, and frankly can't imagine ever being able to afford one (but would be tracking it on a regular basis if I did, better to learn it & avoid killing myself).

Ironically, when I rode bikes I was a reverse-snob about it. I never cared for or about super-bikes when I was a crap rider, but once I became good (following 10 months of dispatch riding) I would turn up my nose if I saw a bike with loads of plastic fairing and no scrapes on the footpegs. It really didn't bother me, I just felt smug to myself & self-satisfied at seeing it - I guess this is because I knew my worn old BMW was just absolutely perfect for me, and I loved riding it.

I wonder if it's sports cars that wind me up because they're exactly the sort of thing that people buy to "prove" they're successful. Nice car, nice house, keeping up with the Joneses. I hate all that, and I guess I do find it hard to comprehend people spending the price of a small house (some places) on something that'll be rusting on the scrapheap in a few years. I would probably develop quite a different perspective if I were wealthier!

Stroller.

I never took the original post too seriously, it made me chuckle more than anything :D The car was an insane and somewhat silly purchase. The camera, well I think less silly. I certainly get a lot more enjoyment from photography than I do from driving like a complete knob :D

Anyway! Off to my pit for some sleep! :D

Gary.
 
Many people buy a expensive camra these days and then think they are the mutts nuts and better than you.

I know friends who have bought better and expensive cameras than my d40x (they bought d700 and d90`s) and they cant take photo for ***t, not only that i think i`ve seen them using them once or twice in the last 8 months!!!! and the result are just normal snapshots.
 
Many people buy a expensive camra these days and then think they are the mutts nuts and better than you.

I know friends who have bought better and expensive cameras than my d40x (they bought d700 and d90`s) and they cant take photo for ***t, not only that i think i`ve seen them using them once or twice in the last 8 months!!!! and the result are just normal snapshots.

Works the other way too. People who say, "wow, nice. You must have an amazing camera!!!"...I just tell them I bought it from the same place Gordon Ramsay bought his pots and pans!!!

Gary.
 
In terms of the people buying equipment and wasting money I have no problem, it's their choice.

But when I see a brand new 5D II, or Nikon D700, being used in green box mode for its whole life time it saddens me.

I'm bloomin' daft
 
In terms of the people buying equipment and wasting money I have no problem, it's their choice.

But when I see a brand new 5D II, or Nikon D700, being used in green box mode for its whole life time it saddens me.

I'm bloomin' daft
If they buy a 1 series canon they have no green box and have to learn how to use them lol.
 
its great - they sell em on ebay cheap to us, when they want the latest fad
 
A mate of mine bought a brand new Saab a while back (he ended up having to sell it about 6 or 9 months later at a tremendous loss, but that's another story!) and it subsequently transpired he didn't have a clue what ABS is. I was just thinking to myself WTF!?!? You spend £23 grand on a car, and you don't know what ABS is?.

Different scenario really imo.

You don't need to know what abs is to enjoy the car, unless he's a professional driver?. In fact the majority of owners don't know what abs is, they just know it helps them. I've also known people spend twice that and also be abs ignorant.
Obviously the same can't be necessarily said with cameras - you'd need to know what it does to exploit the function.

From reading the thread, it sounds like you judged him by your standards, which unfortunately we none of us can do.
 
Maybe not an xD, but I bought a 50D and L glass to start off with. I know that poor results are entirely down to me, and no fault of the gear.

See it? Like it? Afford it?
Then buy it.
 
But if you had £1000 and wanted a new camera wouldn't you want to spend it all on the best one you could afford. You've still got to learn how to use the camera whether it costs you £300 or £3000.

Come on guys be honest - if you had that cash to spare would you really only spend half thinking you can get something better later? I don't think so.

And what are these forums for if not for sharing knowledge?

However, I must say I am surprised some don't spend a little time reading about their kit before they ask the questions - even when they bought an entry level DSLR. One is sometimes tempted to say go and read the manual :)

here here :clap:
 
One of my favourite photographers ever (takes the best low light pictures I've ever seen) uses a D40, albeit with some very nice glass on the front, and is a whizz at PP. He uses the D40 to it's full potential (or very close to it) and is very inventive with composition etc.

His results are sometimes incredible, and prove to me that my Sony a200 is more than enough for what I want/need at the moment, and probably for a very long time to come!!

Me owning an a900 would be purely for the badge factor, and I'd rarther have the £1500+ price difference in my pocket than in my camera bag!!
 
Maybe not an xD, but I bought a 50D and L glass to start off with. I know that poor results are entirely down to me, and no fault of the gear.

See it? Like it? Afford it?
Then buy it.

well said that man, get what suits your price then learn, don't get hung up on what you 'should' be using
 
While I agree that reading the manual would help, I'm not annoyed when someone with a basic camera asks a basic question - that seems fairly reasonable to me. Its the guys who spend a fortune on kit that they have no idea how to use that annoy me. Even then I don't mind helping out by replying to well thought out questions - the really irksome ones are those who think that good camera = good photos...

You have to remember that one persons fortune may well be pocket money to another.
Very wealthy people don't have a problem blowing 3-4k on a camera
It's nothing.......to them and good luck to em.
 
Question:
Is it just me that gets annoyed when people turn up with a 5D, D3 etc and start asking what flash will work and will so and so lens fit? Oh and what mode to use for weddings... :bang:

Answers on the back of a CF card please. :wave:

It doesn't annoy me either. Ok maybe a little bit.
Them buying the expensive stuff help to fund R&D, brings the price down for everybody else and makes them look a bit dim because we know the truth.

Also they can give you a felling of immense smugness knowing that you'll always be happier than they are. Because you brought a camera not a ego extension.
 
You have to remember that one persons fortune may well be pocket money to another.
Very wealthy people don't have a problem blowing 3-4k on a camera
It's nothing.......to them and good luck to em.


but they do look stupid when they produce low quality work
 
oh i see because i came out with that statement im jealous :coat:


If I drive a mini up a one way street would I look more stupid if I did it in a Ferrari ???

and I would be less stupid if I took a bad picture with my Iphone than I would If I took a bad picture with my 5D

Originally I thought the OP meant that he hated people who rush out and buy all the gear and then think that they are qualified to be a wedding, portrait, etc photographer but this thread has turned out to a lot more than this, it seems to be turning into more of an attack on people who can afford to go out and buy 'better' equipment.

If I have spent a lot of money on equipment and I look stupid, who is it hurting as long as i'm not charging for my 'poor quality' work ??
 
Only knowledge and experience can produce good shots, no amount of money cant buy the skill needed to make someone a good photographer.

Once you have the wisdom, the expensive bits of kit can work wonders!

:)
 
Only knowledge and experience can produce good shots, no amount of money cant buy the skill needed to make someone a good photographer.

:)

Agreed 100% so why does it make a difference if someone gains that experience with an £25 old film camera or a £3.5k Leica :shrug:
 
If I drive a mini up a one way street would I look more stupid if I did it in a Ferrari ???

and I would be less stupid if I took a bad picture with my Iphone than I would If I took a bad picture with my 5D

Originally I thought the OP meant that he hated people who rush out and buy all the gear and then think that they are qualified to be a wedding, portrait, etc photographer but this thread has turned out to a lot more than this, it seems to be turning into more of an attack on people who can afford to go out and buy 'better' equipment.

If I have spent a lot of money on equipment and I look stupid, who is it hurting as long as i'm not charging for my 'poor quality' work ??

but why do they ( i ) need top of the range stuff if we dont know what we are doing? is it just to keep up with the joneses, or some sort of statment or one day get the full benefit out of it. by that time it'll be out of date anyway and we'll be on to the next best thing.

If I drive a mini up a one way street would I look more stupid if I did it in a Ferrari ???

irrelevant question you need a licence which entitles you to drive what ever car you want
 
Jealousy is a terrible thing - and generally leaves you unhappy and the other person no worse off in my experience :nono:

The cost of the equipment doesn't bother me at all - what does bug me is lazyness. A lot of people seem to make no effort to find things out for themselves before posting a message. With the search function here, whole internet, books and magazines etc at our disposal then really basic questions can come across as "I can't be bothered to find this out for myself - could you do it for me?" which does irritate me. I suppose if you have spent more it does seem less understandable that you wouldn't put dome effort behind what has been a significant purchase - but then define "significant purchase". £500 is a significant amount to me whereas splashing £2000 is nothing to some lucky people!

I don't disagree with you but this is a another internet resource and it's not necessarily a case of "I can't be bothered to find this out for myself, can you do it for me?" but more "I don't know about this so maybe someone here knows?". Otherwise, surely any questions asked on this forum can be considered "I can't be bothered to find this out myself" type questions?!
 
If expensive cameras were only purchased by people that really know how to use them, very few would be sold.

And if very few were sold, there is no way we would have the fantastic cameras that we now do, especially at the prices.

Amazing kit, incredible prices. Long may rich plonkers prosper :clap: Good luck and well done to them.

Compare this: my Minolta SRT101, 35mm film SLR, manual focus, manual metering, 50mm f/1.7 lens. £183 in 1969, and it took me two years of evening work after school to buy it. According to price-adjuster website, that is a bit over 4 grand in today's money :eek:
 
If I drive a mini up a one way street would I look more stupid if I did it in a Ferrari ???

irrelevant question you need a licence which entitles you to drive what ever car you want

I think you missed the point of the analogy, the license is irrelevant.
 
but why do they ( i ) need top of the range stuff if we dont know what we are doing?

Because they can afford it. Simple really :lol:

If you can afford to blow £4K without a second thought, and you fancy a camera, who are we to call them fools?

Live and let live! I can guarantee, the people who do spend the kind of money being discussed here, don't sit and bitch about those people less fortunate!!!

I will never understand where the "need" to belittle those with a little cash in their pocket comes from. You may laugh, and you may think "so what", but trust me - it can and does hurt people. Just because someone has a few bob in their pocket, does not mean they are immune to bullying and constant **** taking.

Case in point. I bought a bright orange Elise, and I enjoy to drive it with the top down. I never fail to get called a ****** or a poof when up town in it. People seem to enjoy abusing me as a result of the car I drive. Do you think I enjoy that kind of attention? Who in reality, are the real scumbags?

Think about it. Having a bit of cash does not make you a knob. It just makes you a target of many other knobs.

Gary.
 
If I could afford to buy myself a Hasselblad H3D and a collection of lens, build a big ass studio in my garden get lights, backdrops, props etc. I would but I can't so I cant moan about anyone who can!

Yes I am jealous, I think its only natural, but I'm big enough to keep that to myself.

If you could, wouldn't you ???
 
Because they can afford it. Simple really :lol:

If you can afford to blow £4K without a second thought, and you fancy a camera, who are we to call them fools?

Live and let live! I can guarantee, the people who do spend the kind of money being discussed here, don't sit and bitch about those people less fortunate!!!

I will never understand where the "need" to belittle those with a little cash in their pocket comes from. You may laugh, and you may think "so what", but trust me - it can and does hurt people. Just because someone has a few bob in their pocket, does not mean they are immune to bullying and constant **** taking.

Case in point. I bought a bright orange Elise, and I enjoy to drive it with the top down. I never fail to get called a ****** or a poof when up town in it. People seem to enjoy abusing me as a result of the car I drive. Do you think I enjoy that kind of attention? Who in reality, are the real scumbags?

Think about it. Having a bit of cash does not make you a knob. It just makes you a target of many other knobs.

Gary.

Spot on imo. :thumbs:

On the car front, my business partner has been spat several times, and even egged whilst driving his TVR with the roof off! :cuckoo::thumbsdown: I just don't understand some people.:(

Live and let live imo - and if you've earned the money, you have also fully earned the right to enjoy it and spend it however you wish.
 
Agreed 100% so why does it make a difference if someone gains that experience with an £25 old film camera or a £3.5k Leica :shrug:

Im guessing they would never get to own any cheaper models which would have presented them with different & difficult challenges to face - so missing out on the learning experience and enabling them to grow.


They would also have nothing else to compare with and be able to really appreciate how good or bad they or the £3.5k camera might be.


If we start at the bottom we can see room to grow, we gain experience over time.
Starting at the top leaves us no room to grow into better equipment. This could make some people arrogant believing they are the very best because they bought the very best, or it could also make some people very frustrated and angry forcing them to give it up just because they don't have any experience.


I think this is true in all walks of life, not just photography.

Anyway, this is just my opinion :lol::D
 
Spot on imo. :thumbs:

On the car front, my business partner has been spat several times, and even egged whilst driving his TVR with the roof off! :cuckoo::thumbsdown: I just don't understand some people.:(

Live and let live imo - and if you've earned the money, you have also fully earned the right to enjoy it and spend it however you wish.

Have come back to my parked car to 3 or 4 eggs smashed over the dash, and another time, some of a McDonald's milk shake emptied into one of the seats.

I don't think its all down to jealousy. I think its complete malice, and a disregard for how others feel. Ignorant idiots, and nothing else. You can be assured, if you were to stand up to the fools carrying out these acts, you might end up with a knife in the back. This country is full of those *******s.

Gary.
 
Im guessing they would never get to own any cheaper models which would have presented them with different & difficult challenges to face - so missing out on the learning experience and enabling them to grow.


They would also have nothing else to compare with and be able to really appreciate how good or bad they or the £3.5k camera might be.


If we start at the bottom we can see room to grow, we gain experience over time.
Starting at the top leaves us no room to grow into better equipment. This could make some people arrogant believing they are the very best because they bought the very best, or it could also make some people very frustrated and angry forcing them to give it up just because they don't have any experience.


I think this is true in all walks of life, not just photography.

Anyway, this is just my opinion :lol::D

I think the opposite is true. A higher end camera will have more options, more settings, and be geared towards a more professional understanding of the hobby. Surely such a system has the most room for growing into? You are not going to hit a ceiling and need to upgrade to keep that growth going, you can simply fall into the camera, and try and master it, knowing that it will, if you learn the ropes, produce the goods.

Gary.
 
Have come back to my parked car to a 3 or 4 eggs smashed over the dash, and another time, a some of a McDonald's milk shake emptied into one of the seats.

I don't think its all down to jealousy. I think its complete malice, and a disregard for how others feel. Ignorant idiots, and nothing else. You can be assured, if you were to stand up to the fools carrying out these acts, you might end up with a knife in the back. This country is full of those *******s.

Gary.

Yes mate, I totally agree. A recent 3 panel-long key scratch to Russ's TVR whilst parked-up in a private car-park confirms what you say. :shake: I would like to think that the kind of people behave like this will oneday feel ashamed of their actions - sadly, I really don't think that is very likely.
 
Yes mate, I totally agree. A recent 3 panel-long key scratch to Russ's TVR whilst parked-up in a private car-park confirms what you say. :shake: I would like to think that the kind of people behave like this will oneday feel ashamed of their actions - sadly, I really don't think that is very likely.

:thumbsdown:

God help me if I ever see anyone attacking my property like that. I would end up dead, or in jail.

Gary.
 
Have come back to my parked car to 3 or 4 eggs smashed over the dash, and another time, some of a McDonald's milk shake emptied into one of the seats.

I don't think its all down to jealousy. I think its complete malice, and a disregard for how others feel. Ignorant idiots, and nothing else. You can be assured, if you were to stand up to the fools carrying out these acts, you might end up with a knife in the back. This country is full of those *******s.

Gary.

Unfortunately true :(

I think the opposite is true. A higher end camera will have more options, more settings, and be geared towards a more professional understanding of the hobby. Surely such a system has the most room for growing into? You are not going to hit a ceiling and need to upgrade to keep that growth going, you can simply fall into the camera, and try and master it, knowing that it will, if you learn the ropes, produce the goods.

Gary.

Got to agree with that too Gary. I don't see how something like a Sony A200 is going to teach anybody better than a D700 or 5D2, and I certainly know which one is better for an experienced photogrpaher.
 
Different scenario really imo.

You don't need to know what abs is to enjoy the car, unless he's a professional driver?. In fact the majority of owners don't know what abs is, they just know it helps them. I've also known people spend twice that and also be abs ignorant. ...

From reading the thread, it sounds like you judged him by your standards, which unfortunately we none of us can do.
Read my second post on the matter, and reread the original you quoted.

Matey, his Saab & ABS was really an off-topic aside on this "jealousy" thread - I was merely surprised by his lack of knowledge (just as you might be surprised if someone you knew as a "photographer" didn't shoot in RAW or didn't understand the effect of aperture upon depth-of-field or whatever). I already stated that I can completely understand spending that kind of money and not knowing what ABS is if you just want a comfortable car to go from A-to-B. But I had mistaken matey for a "driver", for a "car enthusiast", and that's why I was surprised he didn't hadn't even heard of ABS.

My feelings about granny-drivers in sportscars, on the other hand, is far more akin to this comment:

But when I see a brand new 5D II, or Nikon D700, being used in green box mode for its whole life time it saddens me.

You're welcome to criticise me for my jealousy of people who own mid-engined cars, but I'm sorry for confusing the matter with my other anecdote. The Saab was a 4-door hatchback type of affair, and therefore it's not exciting enough (to me) that I regard it as a waste if it's never driven hard.

Stroller.
 
This thread is actually making me cringe. Why do people think they have a right to criticize people on their spending habits? If rich people kept their money in the bank we'd loose a **** load more jobs than we are at the moment. I'd rather see a plastic surgeon walk into a Bentley garage and spunk £200,000 on a nice car to help keep some people in a job than to have it sitting in a bank where the interest rates ain't even that good.

If people want a product they'll buy it. I'm not going to not buy a camera just because it might annoy some angsty person on the internet. Money is there to be spend, buy the best you can afford and enjoy it.
 
Case in point. I bought a bright orange Elise, and I enjoy to drive it with the top down. I never fail to get called a ****** or a poof when up town in it. People seem to enjoy abusing me as a result of the car I drive. Do you think I enjoy that kind of attention? Who in reality, are the real scumbags?

You're making a statement with a car like that, one that says LOOK at ME, ME, ME!!

If you're going to wave your wallet in people's faces then you have to expect a reaction.....;)
 
You never know where that money came from either.

My gear was paid for because I was left money when my hubby died.....then my dad.

Do you really think I would not throw all my camera gear in the bin if I could have them back?

Sure, be jealous if you like but behind your jealousy lies a lot of heartache on my part. Care to trade those emotions?
 
You're making a statement with a car like that, one that says LOOK at ME, ME, ME!!

If you're going to wave your wallet in people's faces then you have to expect a reaction.....;)

I do expect the reaction, and it just proves how small minded and idiotic some people really are. I might have a flash car, does not mean I should be called names. The car was bought for one reason only, it is a LOT of fun.

Gary.
 
Back
Top