Hi
Previously with the nikon d300 I was fairly happy with the ufraw and gimp processing (sometimes looked a little weird on colour merges, but overall ok - as I has lost the cd/software that came with the camera or it was sluggish).
However when I upgraded to the leica, I was teased into using lightroom ( ufraw and gimp didn't do too well - well gimp was ok, but the raw processing sucked for ufraw) the online version as the solid download/classic wasn't to be found (adobe wanting you pay and keep on paying).
When someone mentioned the photo stacking, I went for a browse and affinity was one of the options, paid. I'm trying picolay at the moment, but I don't feel it does well with the photos (lots of soft glowy parts).
Just seen a post about Affinity and conversion, so I am curious.
Is it the Affinity Photo (as they have a few affinity products) ?
Is it a one off payment and worth it?
Would I use it more than lightroom (ie - halt that payment) or is it more of an after raw processing step?
Regards
Vince
Previously with the nikon d300 I was fairly happy with the ufraw and gimp processing (sometimes looked a little weird on colour merges, but overall ok - as I has lost the cd/software that came with the camera or it was sluggish).
However when I upgraded to the leica, I was teased into using lightroom ( ufraw and gimp didn't do too well - well gimp was ok, but the raw processing sucked for ufraw) the online version as the solid download/classic wasn't to be found (adobe wanting you pay and keep on paying).
When someone mentioned the photo stacking, I went for a browse and affinity was one of the options, paid. I'm trying picolay at the moment, but I don't feel it does well with the photos (lots of soft glowy parts).
Just seen a post about Affinity and conversion, so I am curious.
Is it the Affinity Photo (as they have a few affinity products) ?
Is it a one off payment and worth it?
Would I use it more than lightroom (ie - halt that payment) or is it more of an after raw processing step?
Regards
Vince