LES K said:
Is the 18mm 135mm lens as good as the 70mm 300 or 10mm 24mm please advice is really helpfull
They're lenses with three competent different focal lengths so direct comparisons are inappropriate.
The 10-24mm would be a good lens for landscapes due to the wide (low focal length) angle of view.
The 70-300mm is a good longer zoom lens for the money. If you're serious about wildlife photography you may want a longer lens (such as the Sigma 150-500mm) or a faster one (Nikon 70-200 f2.8). However, these aren't cheap - probably about £700 for the Sigma and £1500 for the Nikon!
You seem a bit confused about what you want - I would caution against spending a lot of money in those circumstances and would recommend that if you DO decide to splurge that buy 2nd hand so that you don't lose too much if you decide to sell.
Personally, if I were you I'd do 2 things;
1. Do a bit more research into the technical aspects of lenses ( focal length, aperture range) so that you understand what certain lenses can and can't do - this will help you understand what you'd like/need.
2. Look at your existing photos and see what focal lengths and subject matter you take shots of the most - let that guide your initial choice of lenses and get others as you need/ want them later.
I'd recommend you either get a cheap 2nd hand superzoom (18-250+) or a 18-55 and 55-200. The two lens option is better, but more hassle to carry. Use these for a few months and see how you get on.