and help to keep the site free for all
Advice on dealing with boring sky
- Thread starter DrPips
- Start date
Sangoma
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,951
- Name
- Steve, Coventry, England
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I like that one better, but to me it looks natural for a damp English morning, not for a bright crisp African morning/evening
Russell Johnson
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 186
- Name
- Russell
- Edit My Images
- No
That's not an African sky for that vegetation or time of year. Those cloud formations are indicative of the end of the rainy season and would be seen in the middle of the day.
The blue would also be crisp, not hazy, as there would be minimal atmospheric pollution.
It's why dropping skies beyond sunsets rarely works.
Last edited:
sk66
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 9,557
- Name
- Steven
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Yeah, I have no idea what a typical african sky might look like (other than clear blue)...
OP
DrPips
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 310
- Name
- Dom
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Like the one in the original photo at the time of year we went!
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
Yes, elephants somewhere between Redcar and Middlesbrough on just about any day of the year. Actually that'd be a good day. Today there's no sky at all.
Sangoma
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,951
- Name
- Steve, Coventry, England
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Had another go slightly less rushed.
Basically created several layers, put the elephants in the sun, changed the sky from a smoggy London morning to a slightly hazy African morning (though the original is how it sometimes looks ), slightly blurred the vegetation in the foreground, and tried to get a bit more detail on the bird.
Don't say it is more accurate, just more how I would like to remember it had I have taken it
Basically created several layers, put the elephants in the sun, changed the sky from a smoggy London morning to a slightly hazy African morning (though the original is how it sometimes looks ), slightly blurred the vegetation in the foreground, and tried to get a bit more detail on the bird.
Don't say it is more accurate, just more how I would like to remember it had I have taken it
For me, I'm not fussed about the sky, it's not what the photo is about. If I were processing this as if it were my own, I'd try masking the bird and try to recover some detail, otherwise I'd be tempt to see wht it was like without the bird.
But that's just me.
But that's just me.
Sangoma
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,951
- Name
- Steve, Coventry, England
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Two people have mentioned the bird, easy to get rid of, but so much part of the scene that it almost seems incomplete without it
Last edited:
OP
DrPips
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 310
- Name
- Dom
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I like the bird. It make it not a ‘perfect’ photo, but my memory of the scene was the family of elephants being accompanied by the bird, so I agree. I like the sky you’ve done thoughTwo people have mentioned the bird, easy to get rid of, but so much part of the scene that it almost seems incomplete without it
View attachment 433175
droj
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 5,069
- Name
- droj
- Edit My Images
- No
This is a photographic forum, not Fookbook or Instawink (substitute vowels & even consonants of choice), in which context it may be suitable to consider the ethos & aims of what we do. Are we decorators, entertainers, or what? What's the purpose of an image? Of course there's quite a range of answers.
Consider the following: trivialisation; fun; dignity; truth; aesthetic; meaning.
Dom, I sympathise with your aim & plight, but why is this image so important? Are there others from your trip that are more satisfying & easier to deal with?
Not suggesting that you chuck this particular one out, I can see its attractions, but in general sometimes that's what's best to do.
It's a good image of a family group, but a bit challenged aesthetically. Your initial adjustments were a bit wild. I suggest that you keep trying yourself, rather than asking for others' input, & that might be a better learning input, because there's been some pretty crazy stuff posted here!
:-(
;-)
Consider the following: trivialisation; fun; dignity; truth; aesthetic; meaning.
Dom, I sympathise with your aim & plight, but why is this image so important? Are there others from your trip that are more satisfying & easier to deal with?
Not suggesting that you chuck this particular one out, I can see its attractions, but in general sometimes that's what's best to do.
It's a good image of a family group, but a bit challenged aesthetically. Your initial adjustments were a bit wild. I suggest that you keep trying yourself, rather than asking for others' input, & that might be a better learning input, because there's been some pretty crazy stuff posted here!
:-(
;-)
Annet
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 125
- Name
- Annet
- Edit My Images
- No
Sky replacement maybe? Ngl, I really liked the sunset version of your picture, OP! But also yeah, re-taking the picture when the surroundings look better would be thу key answer here imo.
SsSsSsSsSnake
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 9,886
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Yes but the bird has flown awayA few tweaks with the levels, a touch of saturation, slight contrast adjust and voilà!
View attachment 433356
Don Fischer
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 540
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Probably won't work for you. But, I have an abandon ranch I like to shoot. Been trying for years to get it with cloud cover and never could get it, always a sky like that. Finally on a trip to it, 40 miles, I got some clouds and took a bunch of photos. It was really blah with the empty sky. I think the reason for that is the sky usually takes up to much room so you end up with lots of nothing.
