Advice Needed on new lens

zeameth

Suspended / Banned
Messages
353
Edit My Images
Yes
I am looking for new lens for my D7000 and i can't quite make up my mind on what to go for. Off to Cuba for 3 weeks later in the year and i would like a lens to take with me.

i already own:

Nikon 35mm 1.8
Tamron 90mm Macro
Nikon 18-55 Kit lens (non vr and quite old)
Nikon 55-200 (again non vr and quite old)

The new lens will ideally replace the 18-55 and be my standard walk about lens. While the 18-55 gives me good results in sharpness and contract its a PITA to use as the barrel tends to collapse when used with a CPL. Size and weight are not really an issue.

The Main Contenders are:

Nikon 16-85mm VR
I am thinking that the extra 2mm will come in particularly handy, Most reviews i could find state the lens is sharp throughout the zoom range and has good contrast. Lens speed and bokeh seem to be the only drawbacks

sigma 17-70 f2.8-4

Faster than the Nikon and with much nicer bokeh by most accounts but from what i could find it gets mixed reviews, Some samples are stated as being sharp across the frame and zoom range while others report a big fall off in sharpness and a lot of softening towards to edges (some say up to 40% of the image) I suppose it varies lens to lens how prevalent these issues are.

Nikon 18-200 VR/VR2

Ive used a 18-200 VR on a d80 before whilst in South Africa and the lens performed magnificently, but the same lens on my d7000 never performed as well. Saying that the appeal of such a range in walkabout lens is hard to ignore

I am leaning towards the 16-85mm Nikon as it seems to get the best results overall, I suppose i am asking if there is anything else to consider lens wise and whether i have missed anything with the lenses above. I am particularly interested to hear from owners of the lenses to see what they think of them.


Many thanks in advance

Zeameth
 
I think you're right with the 16-85 as you're going to have some beautiful vistas in Cuba and use the 35mm for the evenings.

I have the 18-200 VRII and it's a useful '1 fits all', but I just don't feel it's a great lens at the end of the day...
 
I had the 18-200VR on my D7000 (when I had it) and also currently use it as a walk about lens on my D7100.

Never had any problems with it - what problems are you having?

Another lens might be worth considering is the 18-105mm VR as a walkabout.
 
I think you're right with the 16-85 as you're going to have some beautiful vistas in Cuba and use the 35mm for the evenings.

I have the 18-200 VRII and it's a useful '1 fits all', but I just don't feel it's a great lens at the end of the day...

Thats the exact thing i was having, whilst perfectly 'fine' my images just left me wanting a little more in sharpness and contrast with the d7000. I had a look at the 18-105 and 18-140 as well and in general the reviews for the 16-85 seems better across the board. Going to pick one up shortly
 
I brought the Sigma 18-270mm lens and for your trip it would be a good all round lens, it has a lock at 18mm and also VR which is a great help. I use it with my D7000 and also most of the lens you have.
 
I have the 16-85 on my D300 and hardly take it off. I find the results really nice and it's well balanced on the camera. I would recommend it but have no experience of any others so can't compare it to those.
 
When I had the 18-200mm,it didn't leave my camera.

Focuses to 1:3, great range and sharp throughout. Excellent walkabout and you will end up with it costing £150 after you sell the now obsolete 18-55 and 55-200.

Anyone that can't get good shots either has a duff copy or more likely, needs more practice!
 
So i went for a 16-85 which is currently on its way back, Having heard good things about MPB i figured i would give them a try and took a chance on a lens listed as mint...

Arrived showing lots of wear and tear, chip the outer element frame and load of marks on the internal elements... so i'm still on the hunt
 
Last edited:
Back
Top