- Messages
- 20,926
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Other law enforcement officers abroad carry guns, I find it out ours do not. It would help them deal with unrest so much more easily. Our cities are bear pits, they need these guns.
, I find it out ours do not. It would help them deal with unrest so much more easily. Our cities are bear pits, they need these guns
And, as a member of the public who has followed news stories of (often) totally innocent members of the public being shot by the so-called highly trained police marksmen, I wouldn't be happy to see police officers routinely armed
Steve, do you actually become nervous at dusk and hide quivering behind firmly locked doors and twitching curtains until the sun re-appears?
Or are you, in fact, posting from Beirut?
If you have to take public transport late at night (after 9pm) up here, you contend with drunks, rowdy blokes, neds, all of which have the real potential to pose you danger. It's not uncommon for violence to happen in the cities/trains/buses.
Its why I welcome these armed policemen with open arms to our streets, they will give a real obvious deterent. I'd love to see them ride the trains too, one per carriage. It would stop the rowdiness and unpleasantness. I'd love with if you could post without satire and sarcasm, but I will not hold my breath
If you have to take public transport late at night (after 9pm) up here, you contend with drunks, rowdy blokes, neds, all of which have the real potential to pose you danger. It's not uncommon for violence to happen in the cities/trains/buses.
Its why I welcome these armed policemen with open arms to our streets, they will give a real obvious deterent. I'd love to see them ride the trains too, one per carriage. It would stop the rowdiness and unpleasantness. I'd love with if you could post without satire and sarcasm, but I will not hold my breath
and live in some post-apocalyptic lawless hellhole.
If you have to take public transport late at night (after 9pm) up here, you contend with drunks, rowdy blokes, neds, all of which have the real potential to pose you danger. It's not uncommon for violence to happen in the cities/trains/buses.
Its why I welcome these armed policemen with open arms to our streets, they will give a real obvious deterent. I'd love to see them ride the trains too, one per carriage. It would stop the rowdiness and unpleasantness. I'd love with if you could post without satire and sarcasm, but I will not hold my breath
It's only a deterrent if there is a possibility of use. No one would consider it reasonable to shoot rowdy drunks, blokes and neds (whatever they are).
Personally, I do not want to see our police armed. Once you arm the police, the criminals will start going out armed.
Steve.
Some knife yield and kick peoples faces in. Armed police will help instil a sense of public order. I think it's great.
I'm off to poke red hot knitting needles in my eyes and cut me genitals off with a rusty junior hacksaw
Some knife yield and kick peoples faces in. Armed police will help instil a sense of public order. I think it's great.
snipers on motorway bridges shooting speeders and general moron drivers, that'd get my vote
maybe just drop a few grenades randomly off the bridges?Snipers? No, they are for one off precision.....an area weapon is much more appropriate for places where so many people fit into the category. Whats the biggest Nuc you can get?
Seen both happen and witnessed two stabbings in one night on my drunken sprawl around Glasgow a few years back. I don't visit there often but when I have it has been lively to say the least lol. Totally different place in the day but maybe I was just hanging around a dodgy part.
Number plate recognition gun turrets and instead of spike strips use cheese wiremaybe just drop a few grenades randomly off the bridges?
Our cities are not bear pits. That's ridiculous.
Also, I suppose you would have no issue with the police shooting dead rowdy drunks?
seriously, they're not going to adopt a judge dredd approach and pop an unarmed civvy even if they are kicking off.They are. Leeds, Newcastle, Glasgow I've sampled on Saturday nights. The rowdiness and drunkeness which trims violent is appalling. Armed police will set the tone and give people a second thought when they attack police officers arresting their mate. Can't wait to see more of this armed police
seriously, they're not going to adopt a judge dredd approach and pop an unarmed civvy even if they are kicking off.
more suited to tazer IMO, which more officers appear to have anyway.Bottle yeilding, syringe yielding, knife yielding. It happens all the time
The choice of a 'junior' hacksaw is interesting, surely a whopping great big saw would have been betterI actually agree with you here.
I'm off to poke red hot knitting needles in my eyes and cut me genitals off with a rusty junior hacksaw.![]()
more suited to tazer IMO, which more officers appear to have anyway.
Bottle yeilding, syringe yielding, knife yielding
The choice of a 'junior' hacksaw is interesting, surely a whopping great big saw would have been better![]()
the police get enough (unwarranted mostly) grief as it is, let alone dropping every drunkard that points something sharp at them.Guns work for me.
With the greatest possible respect, the law in this country protects the police (or anyone else) from prosecution as long as the person using the force believed, at the time, that it was reasonable and necessary. Therefore, when a police officer shoots an innocent member of the public (or a criminal who doesn't in fact present a real danger) the police officer is still acting lawfully as long as s/he can come up with a good explanation of his/her actions, whether true or not.The article is misleading, if you don't read all of it.
This isn't anything new. DPG officers in London deal with non DPG incidents and are armed, same with armed officers at Heathrow.
Whats happening in Scotland does therefore make sense. It's simply the ARV crews having the gun strapped to them, rather than having them locked away in the boot, which was the case when armed response first started.
They are still Police and still have a responsibility for dealing with anything a Policeman should. Gone are they days when armed officers used to peddle the line they were armed so could not deal with run of the mill stuff.
No, it wouldn't, in fact in some ways it makes it harder. If you have to get all tangled up in a fight, then the officers has to keep much of his mind on the security of the weapon. Unarmed you don't have that concern.
If you aren't fighting with the yobs, it makes no real difference, they know they aren't in play to get shot.
I think you'll find it's far fewer than the number of members of the public shot by...members of the public! In fact the number is 33 people killed by Police since 1995. The vast majority of those there is no argument that they were shot perfectly lawfully. In the small number that remain, one is now sub judice, and the only others where there were proceedings resulted a finding of not guilty.
So please do tell what you base this 'unhappiness' on?
If you have to take public transport late at night (after 9pm) up here, you contend with drunks, rowdy blokes, neds, all of which have the real potential to pose you danger. It's not uncommon for violence to happen in the cities/trains/buses.
were do you live in Glasgow - I travel through some not so nice areas on public transport and have never in 20 years had an issue. you must be seriously paranoid. maybe time to move
what exactly is an armed response police-person going to achieve against some drunk idiots that an unarmed police-person could not?
Have his gun nicked in the scuffle?
To be fair he did say it was Glasgow...You post like you are in constant fear for your life, and live in some post-apocalyptic lawless hellhole.